In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled unanimously that hate crime laws are not “constitutionally and morally unsound” 1 .
Specifically, in the case of Wisconsin v. Mitchell , the Court upheld a Wisconsin hate crime statute that allowed for longer prison sentences if a criminal intentionally selected their victim based on factors such as race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry 2 .
This landmark decision clarified that enhanced penalties for bias-motivated crimes do not violate a defendant’s First Amendment rights 1 .
The case involved Todd Mitchell, who encouraged a group to attack a white teenager based on his race 1 .
The Court’s ruling affirmed the constitutionality of such laws, recognizing the importance of addressing hate crimes and protecting vulnerable communities 1 .
For the reasons listed in wiki, the Court reversed the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision, and remanded the case to a lower court for final proceedings.[1]
Source: BingAI
Post navigation
politics,pollution,petitions,pop culture & purses
You must be logged in to post a comment.