Conclusion

All nine Supreme Court justices are constitutionally obligated to prioritize the Constitution over any individual, including Trump. Their oath and the Court’s role as a check on executive power, as affirmed in Marbury v. Madison and Cooper v. Aaron, underscore this duty. While recent rulings, like Trump v. United States and Trump v. CASA, have enabled Trump’s agenda by expanding executive power or limiting judicial checks, these reflect a conservative judicial philosophy, not direct loyalty to Trump. Unanimous decisions like Kilmar Abrego Garcia show the Court can still act impartially. Citizens can influence the Court indirectly through elections, litigation, public pressure, and congressional reform, leveraging the democratic system to reinforce the justices’ constitutional duty.

If you want specific strategies to engage (e.g., advocacy groups or contacting officials), let me know!

Source: Grok