On May Day, at marches and rallies all over the country, more than half a million people stood up for immigration reform.
Your activism is making a difference – last week, the Democratic leadership stood up and introduced an outline for a bi-partisan bill that will pave the road for real reform. There’s a lot in this outline that we support, like family unification and protection for workers. There are also some provisions that we’re going to work to reform. But none of that can happen until they introduce the bill and start the debate in Congress. That’s why we’ve started an emergency action to Congress – to continue the momentum from this weekend and show our elected leaders that the need for reform is real. Click here to send a fax with this message:
Time and time again, our leaders in Congress and in the White House have told us that they understand how important immigration reform is for families and communities across the country. But they still haven’t turned their words of support into action. We don’t need another statement, or another reassurance. We need a bill on the Senate floor. National comprehensive immigration reform is more than a political catchphrase. It’s standing up for what’s right. And it’s the only way to ensure that more states don’t follow Arizona’s lead in legalizing racial profiling and the politics of fear. Send a fax to your elected leaders now. Thank you, p.s. There’s more coverage of this weekend’s marches on our blog – check it out after you send a fax! |
Category Archives: ~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture
ThinkProgess …
MILITARY — GATES URGES CONGRESS TO DELAY ‘DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL’ REPEAL: In a strongly-worded letter to House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO), Defense Secretary Robert Gates wrote he doesn’t want Congress to take any action on repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) until the Pentagon’s “working group” on the issue has completed its work to determine the impact a repeal would have on the U.S. Armed Forces. Citing the need for a “a thorough, objective, and systematic assessment of the impact of such a policy change,” Gates wrote, “I strongly oppose any legislation that seeks to change this policy prior to the completion of this vital assessment process.” According to Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, Gates’ stance “delivered a devastating blow to getting repeal done this year,” which Obama has asked Congress to do. Sarvis called the letter a “joint political decision” by Obama and Gates and and said that it “showed a lack of respect for our LGBT service members who are on the frontlines every day risking their lives for our safety.” There is momentum for a DADT repeal this year as 13 Democratic senators have signed onto an effort to enact a repeal after the Pentagon’s review has completed. One of the bill’s co-sponsors, Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO), responded to the letter by saying, “There is no reason why Congress shouldn’t pass legislation this year that would time the repeal to follow the conclusion of the study.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has also signaled her support for repeal, saying that Congress should “immediately place a moratorium on dismissals under this policy until the review has been completed and Congress has acted.” Democrats in Congress will have a tougher time attracting moderate and Republican co-sponsors in light of Gates’ letter, and if Congress waits until next year — after the Pentagon review is completed — to move forward on legislation, the make-up of the legislature will be different and could again delay repeal. White House Spokesman Tommy Vietor said Friday, “The President’s commitment to repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is unequivocal. This is not a question of if, but how. That’s why we’ve said that the implementation of any congressional repeal will be delayed until the DOD study of how best to implement that repeal is completed. The President is committed to getting this done both soon and right.”
Congress at Work …
Resume consideration of S.3217, Wall Street Reform.
Votes:
There will be no roll call votes on Monday, May 3.
***************************************************
CURRENT HOUSE FLOOR PROCEEDINGS
LEGISLATIVE DAY OF MAY 3, 2010
111TH CONGRESS – SECOND SESSION
- 10:06 A.M. –
- The Speaker announced that the House do now adjourn. The next meeting is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. on May 4, 2010.
- 10:05 A.M. –
- The House received a message from the Clerk. Pursuant to the permission granted in Clause 2(h)of Rule II of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Clerk notified the house that she had received a message from the Secretary of the Senate on April 30, 2010 at 11:20 a.m. stating that that body had passed H.R. 3714 and had agreed to S.Con.Res. 61, S.Con.Res. 62, and H.Con.Res. 264.
Kendrick Meek … for US Senate
Volunteer for Kendrick
ThinkProgress.org …
HEALTH CARE — SCHWARZENEGGER BECOMES THE FIRST REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR TO SUPPORT HEALTH CARE REFORM: California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R), who had previously described national health care reform as “health care to nowhere” infected with “bribes, deals and loopholes,” announced Thursday that California will fully comply with the new law. In a news conference at the University of California at Davis Medical Center, Schwarzenegger broke with the host of Republican governors and attorneys general attempting to sue the federal government over the law, saying, “California is not part of this fight, and I’ll tell you why. When you don’t have health insurance and you go to the hospital, you are forcing other people to pay for your healthcare.” While saying the plan is “not without flaws,” the governor nonetheless called it “a good law,” adding that “it is the time for California to move ahead with it, thoughtfully and responsibly.” Schwarzenegger’s endorsement makes him the first Republican governor to publicly support health reform, delivering a major victory for Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who been trying to make clear how the law is beneficial to the states. In fact, Schwarzenegger attempted a similar reform of California’s health care system in 2007. His plan would have required Californians — even undocumented immigrants — to purchase health insurance coverage, mandated businesses with 10 or more employees to offer insurance or pay a fee, and expanded public health programs. Schwarzenegger’s proposal would also have prohibited insurers from denying coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions and required companies to spend at least 85 percent of their premium proceeds on patient care.










