Tag Archives: Congress

Set the so-called “Climategate” record straight


Alliance for Climate Protection

Last week, a third independent investigation exonerated the climate scientists whose emails were hacked last fall — finding the attacks lacked foundation. That’s right: Three full, independent reviews have found no wrongdoing on the part of the scientists — and most importantly, affirmed the scientific evidence of climate change.

So you might think that any reputable media outlet would feel compelled to set the record straight. But you’d be wrong.

In particular, the Wall Street Journal has published more than 30 editorials and op-eds on climate change since November of 2009. All took the stance that climate science was unreliable, dishonest or questionable — or minimally unimportant. And unbelievably, just today, the Journal published another op-ed about the reviews, calling them a “whitewash” by “global warming alarmists.”

Send a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page demanding that they set the record straight on climate change science.

It’s vital that we receive balanced coverage from all of the media, and the Journal‘s actions matter. As Congress works to craft comprehensive policies to address our energy and climate crises, public understanding of this issue is more important than ever before.

A news outlet like the Wall Street Journal relies on its reputation as a balanced, unbiased news source. With your help, we can convince the Journal editorial page to give equal space to the fact that climate scientists have been exonerated and their findings remain affirmed.

Demand that the Wall Street Journal cover the facts about climate science.

Few news outlets in the U.S. are as well regarded and widely read among opinion makers and politicians as the Wall Street Journal. It has a responsibility to its readers and the American public to be fair and accurate on one of the most important issues of our time.

Balanced media coverage today won’t give back the precious time we’ve lost defending scientific facts that should not have been in question. But perhaps it will remind our media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, of their responsibility to the American people.

Thank you,

Maggie L. Fox
President and CEO
Alliance for Climate Protection

Stop the Big Oil Bailout


Big Oil companies are ripping you off — and I don’t just mean at the pump. BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and other oil companies are raking in some of the biggest corporate profits in history while taking $35 billion in government subsidies and tax breaks every year.

That’s $35 billion of your money being used to pad the bottom line of oil companies like ExxonMobil, which posted over $45 billion in profits last year alone.

Oil companies don’t need a taxpayer bailout while making money hand over fist. That’s why we’re joining our friends at Credo Action and True Majority to end the Big Oil Bailout. Sign our petition today and we’ll make sure every member of Congress and candidate for office sees that we stand with clean, renewable energy, not Big Oil.

STOP THE BIG OIL BAILOUT — SIGN THE PETITION TODAY

President Obama campaigned on an energy plan that promised to break America’s addiction to oil and invest in clean, renewable energy sources. But the Big Oil Bailout that costs taxpayers billions of dollars every year is only feeding our addiction to dirty fuels.

With oil still gushing into the Gulf of Mexico, now is the time to break that addiction once and for all. We need to stop sending taxpayer money to some of the richest corporations on the planet. We need to end all taxpayer subsidies and tax breaks to oil companies and invest in clean energy companies to create new green jobs. Sign the petition today and let Congress know where you stand.

SIGN THE PETITION TO END TAXPAYER GIVEAWAYS BIG OIL

With your help, we can put an end to the Big Oil Bailout and finally break our oil addiction.

Thank you for everything you do,

-Charles

Charles Chamberlain, Political Director
Democracy for America

BP Republicans


The Democratic Party
For weeks, Republicans have been tripping over each other as they rush to defend BP. They’ve apologized to the oil giant, accused the President of a shakedown, and called for deregulation of the oil and gas industry. It’s as if they’ve forgotten that they have a responsibility to the people of the Gulf who’ve seen their lives and livelihoods upended by this tragedy.

We’ve put together a site to help get the story out and show in a very pointed way exactly how Republicans are standing with BP. Will you check it out and share it with five friends?

Check it out

While the site we’ve created is a parody, this isn’t a laughing matter. We need to make sure voters know who was standing with BP throughout this crisis, and we need your help to do it. We’ve built the site to make it easy to share with friends, email to family, or post to Facebook and Twitter.

We want folks to know this wasn’t just a gaffe or slip of the tongue — this is how the Republicans would govern. Rep. Joe Barton apologized to BP and called the victim relief fund a “tragedy.” Rep. Steve King agreed, and went on talk radio to say “I think Joe Barton was spot on.” Rep. Michelle Bachman said that BP shouldn’t agree to be “fleeced.” Rand Paul — the GOP nominee for Senate in Kentucky — said that President Obama’s efforts to hold BP accountable were “un-American.” And Sharron Angle — the Republican Senate nominee in Nevada — even said her solution to the energy crisis was to “deregulate” big oil.

You might think that a company responsible for the worst environmental disaster in American history wouldn’t have many friends in Washington. But for BP, that’s just not the case.

We need to make sure that the American people know which side the GOP is on. Will you check out our new site and share it with five others?

http://www.bprepublicans.com/

Thanks,

Brad

Brad Woodhouse
Communications Director
Democratic National Committee

MILITARY: More Help For Veterans With PTSD


President Obama announced in his weekly address on Saturday that starting today, a new claims process for military veterans dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) will be established to make it easier to receive benefits and care. “We have a solemn responsibility to provide our veterans and wounded warriors with the care and benefits they’ve earned when they come home,” the President said. “In past wars, [PTSD] wasn’t something America always talked about. And as a result, our troops and their families often felt stigmatized or embarrassed when it came to seeking help,” Obama noted, adding that “we’ve made it clear up and down the chain of command that folks should seek help if they need it.” A senior administration official said the new process will make it “a lot easier” for veterans suffering from PTSD “because the threshold has been liberalized to the point where it’s much easier to verify.”

THE NEED FOR CHANGE: In 2008, the RAND Corp. found that among 300,000 servicemembers, nearly one in five veterans returning from Iraq or Afghanistan showed symptoms of PTSD or major depression, and only half of those sought treatment. The study found that lax PTSD diagnosis and treatment will cost the military as much as $6.2 billion in the two years following deployment and “[i]nvesting in more high-quality treatment could save close to $2 billion within two years by substantially reducing those indirect costs.” Indeed, Obama administration officials noted that while benefits will likely be granted to more veterans, it will be “quicker and easier and therefore less costly per case.” “There is a major health crisis facing those men and women who have served our nation in Iraq and Afghanistan,” said RAND’s Terri Tanielian at the time of the study’s release. “Unfortunately, we found there are many barriers preventing them from getting the high-quality treatment they need.” In another study last year, the San Francisco Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) “found that more than one-third of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans who enrolled in the veterans health system after 2001 were diagnosed with a mental health problem, the most common being post-traumatic stress disorder and depression.” Mental health issues are related to other problems veterans confront, such as drug addiction and homelessness. And as of last year, five U.S. soldiers try to commit suicide every day compared to one per day before the Iraq war began.

A NEW STREAMLINED PROCESS: Under the new guidelines — applicable not only to those who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also in previous conflicts — veterans will not have to document what caused their PTSD. Instead, they will now only be required “to show a diagnosis of PTSD and that it was related to service overall, not a specific event.” “I don’t think our troops on the battlefield should have to take notes to keep for a claims application,” Obama said. “And I’ve met enough veterans to know that you don’t have to engage in a firefight to endure the trauma of war.” Under the old guidelines, veterans advocates argued that it “could be impossible for veterans to find records of a firefight or bomb blast.” The old rules also “ignored other causes of PTSD, such as fearing a traumatic event even if it doesn’t occur,” which could “discriminate against female troops prohibited from serving on front lines and against those who don’t experience combat directly.” The new regulations acknowledge that the nature of military conflicts, past and present, include “guerrilla warfare, insurgent activities where stressors may include constant vigilance against unexpected attack, the absence of a defined frontline, the difficulty of distinguishing enemy combatants from civilians, and the ubiquity of improvised explosive devices.”

YEARS OF NEGLECT: As Center for American Progress analysts Lawrence Korb, Sean Duggan, Max Bergmann, and Peter Juul have noted, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are the first conflicts since WWII in which service members have been asked to undertake multiple deployments without adequate time at home between tours to rest and recuperate. During two terms in office, the Bush administration did not do nearly enough to safeguard the health and readiness of the U.S. armed forces. Bush officials regularly downplayed the scourge of PTSD, and often times, reports from the military and the Department of Veterans Affairs on the numbers of troops diagnosed with PTSD were “disturbingly low” — suggesting that the administration understated cases of mental disorder resulting from war. In the latter years of the Bush presidency, e-mails leaked from the VA revealed that agency employees were discouraged from diagnosing soldiers and veterans with PTSD. One e-mail complained of “compensation seeking veterans” and urged VA staff to rule out PTSD and “consider a diagnosis of ‘Adjustment Disorder'” instead. Moreover, in 2008, then-VA Secretary James Peake suggested that PTSD and traumatic brain injury have been “overblown.” While Peake said that brain injuries are serious, he downplayed what veterans experience “to what anyone who played football in their youth might have suffered.” Veterans with mental disorders were even being used to test new drugs. In 2008, the Washington Times reported that “mentally distressed veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan are being recruited for government tests on pharmaceutical drugs linked to suicide and other violent side effects.” During his confirmation hearing, current VA Secretary Gen. Eric Shinseki (ret.) promised to make the VA a “21st-century organization” that meets the needs of a growing population of wounded veterans. Indeed, Obama’s 2010 budget for the VA emphasizes a veteran-centric commitment by expanding services by 15.5 percent over 2009, the largest percentage increase for the VA requested by a president in more than 30 years.

Progress Report: from the ThinkProgress.org site

Under The Radar…BP contractor speaks out


UNDER THE RADAR

BUSINESS — BP CONTRACTOR: ‘WHAT THIS COMPANY IS DOING TO THIS COUNTRY RIGHT NOW IS JUST WRONG’: A former contractor has come forward to denounce oil giant BP and the “cutthroat individuals” running the oil disaster response. On Friday, contractor-turned-

whistleblower Adam Dillon told New Orleans television station WDSU that he was fired “after taking photos that he believes were related to the use of dispersants and to the cleanup of the oil.” As a BP liaison, he had rebuffed reporters’ attempts to observe cleanup operations in Grand Isle, LA, in June, before being promoted to the BP Command Center near Houma, LA. At the command center, BP manages the private contractors who are running practically every aspect of the spill response. Dillon, a former U.S. Army Special Operations soldier, “has lost faith in the company in charge,” stating that BP’s “bottom line is just about money.” “There are some very cutthroat individuals,” he said. “They’re not worried about cleaning up that spill as it is.” He decided to go public because “he placed his oath to his country over and above any loyalty to BP,” adding that “what this company is doing to this country right now is just wrong.” Before he was fired, Dillon was “confined and interrogated for almost an hour.” WDSU’s Scott Walker will air more of his interview with Dillon tonight. His troubling firsthand account joins other reports from the likes of wives of Gulf Coast fisherman and independent scientists who are breaking the media blackout on BP’s private army of contractors.

source: thinkprogress.org