Tag Archives: Ethnicity

Ensuring 2014 is a Year of Action to Grow the Economy


Watch: President Obama's Weekly AddressPromise Zones: The President announced on Thursday the first five “Promise Zone” locations, an initiative to partners with local communities and businesses to create jobs, expand access to educational opportunities and spur economic mobility.

President Obama was joined in the East Room by students from Harlem Children’s Zone, an educational undertaking that inspired the Promise Zones, where he spoke about the importance of making sure a child’s path isn’t determined by their zip code, but rather by their hard work and determination. In his speech, the President mentioned how he wasn’t so different from one of the students who has benefitted from the Harlem Children’s Zone.

“If you want to know why I care about this stuff so much, it’s because I’m not that different from Roger,” President Obama said.

There was a period of time in my life where I was goofing off. I was raised by a single mom. I didn’t know my dad. The only difference between me and Roger was my environment was more forgiving than his. That’s the only difference. If I screwed up, the consequences weren’t quite as great. So if Roger can make it, and if I can make it, if Kiara can make it, every kid in this country can make it.

The Promise Zones, located in San Antonio, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Southeastern Kentucky, and the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, are the first of 20 being launched over the next three years.

Extending Emergency Unemployment Insurance: On Tuesday, President Obama called on Congress to extend emergency unemployment insurance. Two weeks ago, Congress failed to renew the vital lifeline that temporarily extends insurance for 1.3 million Americans who are currently looking for work. “Now, I’ve heard the argument that says extending unemployment insurance will somehow hurt the unemployed because it zaps their motivation to get a new job,” the President said.

I really want to go at this for a second. That really sells the American people short…I can’t name a time where I met an American who would rather have an unemployment check than the pride of having a job. The long-term unemployed are not lazy. They’re not lacking in motivation. They’re coping with the aftermath of the worst economic crisis in generations.

The President noted that this insurance is not an abstraction but rather a way to provide a bit of extra security, so that losing your job doesn’t mean you lose everything you’ve worked to build.

Affordable Care Act: This week, a new report showed that the growth of health care spending is continuing to slow, and Dr. Biden shared her personal connection to the fight against breast cancer to help highlight a new announcement about no-cost chemoprevention medication for women at high risk of the disease.

Since January 1, Americans across the country who signed up for health coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplaces have new access to quality and affordable health coverage. Read one man’s story as well as stories from 10 others who have received coverage and what it means to them.

We the Geeks: It was a big week for “We the Geeks,” which hosted two Google+ hangouts, one on the future of computing and the other on the polar vortex. Scientists and tech experts answered your pressing questions on computing advancements and climate change. If you haven’t already, make sure to check out this video that explains the polar vortex in two minutes and why climate change means more extreme weather is likely in the future. Want to know about future “We the Geeks” hangouts? Make sure to sign up for email updates here.

Strengthening our Nation’s Energy Infrastructure: On Thursday, the President signed a memorandum that established the first federal government Quadrennial Energy Review (QER) process. Throughout the next four years, the QER will provide a review of federal energy policies and make sure they are keeping up with the changing energy landscape.

This amendment could kill food safety


U.S. Congress: Stop the King Amendment to the 2013 Farm Bill                  

  By Campaign for Safe Food
                                                Los Angeles, California

Right now, a House and Senate conference committee is hashing out the details of the 2013 Farm Bill.

Within the House version of the bill is an amendment offered by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) that has the potential to wipe out states’ rights to label genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

The amendment includes sweeping language about states’ rights to regulate food and farming, and could nullify a wide range of state and local measures regarding food safety, labeling, environmental requirements, humane treatment of farm animals, labor standards, and other important issues.

The amendment could also overturn current bans on dangerous agricultural chemicals like methyl iodide, and allow a flood of these pesticides into our food supply.

But there’s still time to keep this dangerous amendment out of the final version of the Farm Bill. Please sign and share our petition today!

To read more about this flawed and potentially disastrous amendment, click here.

VA punishing veterans in debt?


The Department of Veterans Affairs: Change Medical Debt Policies; Stop Punishing Veterans with Debt

By Bob Gardner

W. Warwick, Rhode Island

The way that the Department of Veterans Affairs collects medical debts from veterans is unacceptable. As a disabled veteran trying to pay my medical bills and get treatment, I struggle every day to navigate a backwards system that creates unnecessary stress for veterans, produces significant paper waste, and punishes veterans trying to pay off their debt.

Here’s how the current system works: When a veteran like me makes a payment, it is applied to the oldest invoice on record, instead of being applied to the most current invoice. The vast majority of healthcare companies in America do the opposite – they pay off new invoices first and use any remainder to pay down debt. Paying new invoices first allows patients to pay down debt without going into more. But the Department of Veteran’s Affairs’ backward system makes it really hard for vets to ever catch up on payments.

When  veterans have debt, they must submit a complete 3+ page paper financial statement every 90 days for every facility they go to, otherwise the Department of Veterans Affairs seizes the veteran’s total disability payment as well as 20% of any other federal income that the veteran is receiving, like Social Security Disability Insurance payments.

Filling out these forms every 90 days puts an unnecessary burden on our veterans, violates the intent of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and means that if a veteran misses getting his/her financial statements in on time just once, the government can seize that person’s income.

The VA needs to fix this broken system so that veterans can pay off their medical debt like other Americans and keep the income they need to live.

I propose that payments made on a veteran’s debt be applied to the newest invoices first, with the excess going to older debt, so that the new debt doesn’t age past the 90 day limit every 90 days. This is how most healthcare companies in America address debt. Also, a website should be set up so that the veteran can update just the information that has changed since his/her last financial statement once per year.

These changes would improve financial freedom, reduce stress for veterans who have served their country, comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act, reduce waste, and save filing space in the Department of Veterans Affairs offices. Join me in asking the Department of Veteran’s affairs to change their medical debt collection policies.

“Any nation that does not honor its heros will not long endure” – Abraham Lincoln

“A man who is good enough to shed his blood for his country is good enough to be given a square deal afterwards.”

– Theodore Roosevelt

A Traffic Study?


By 

10 Must-Read Stories On The Christie Bridge Scandal

Here are ten items on the developing controversy directly implicating New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s senior staff to a petty case of political retribution.

a message from Rep. Grayson …What Obamacare Really Is All About


HCHumanRight0108What We Should Have Been Talking About

One of the more frustrating elements of the debate about Obamacare is that the Right Wing has dictated the terms of that debate.

Resolved: Does American Want Socialized Medicine?

While the Obamacare legislation was being legislated, the debate was about “socialized medicine.”  As if.  Obamacare is no more a government takeover of healthcare than air traffic control is a government takeover of the skies.   Or traffic lights are a government takeover of the roads.  (Although the Post Office is, in fact, a government takeover of the mail.  Cue to Tea Partiers blowing up their own mailboxes.)

Resolved: Is Obamacare Unconstitional?

Then there was that interminable debate about whether Obamacare is constitutional.  Let me get this straight: are you telling me that it is constitutional for the Government to draft your rear-end and ship you to Vietnam to serve as cannon fodder, but somehow it isn’t constitutional for the Government to make you pay for your own emergency-room care?  Oh, come on!  If it’s constitutional for the Government to put you in prison if you fail to buy car insurance, then surely it’s constitutional for the Government to make you pay a fee if you fail to buy health insurance.

Resolved: Isn’t the Obamacare Website Absolutely Sucktastic?

And now the Tea Partiers are shedding crocodile tears over the Obamacare website.  The website that they tried to repeal, on 40+ different occasions.  The website that went live on the very day that they shut down the federal government.  Because, you know, they get really upset if there is any delay in people obtaining Obamacare coverage, since they don’t want anyone ever to have it.

Why?  Why did the Right Wing go to such lengths to dictate the Obamacare debate?  Because if you’re obsessing over government takeovers, and constitutionality, and a website, then you aren’t ever taking about:

  • closing the “donut hole” in prescription drug coverage for seniors;
  • extending coverage and care to 40 million people with preexisting conditions;
  • prohibiting insurance companies from literally pulling the plug on patients whose care becomes too expensive;
  • allowing young adults up to the age of 26 to remain on their parents’ health insurance policies;
  • eliminating deductibles and copayments for ordinary care for seniors;
  • mandating refunds for seniors who are overcharged under the Medicare Advantage program;
  • eliminating useless and predatory “junk” coverage;
  • prohibiting overcharging on the basis of gender;
  • preventing employers who don’t offer insurance coverage from making employers who do offer coverage feel like suckers and fools;
  • extending Medicaid to the working poor; and
  • paying over one-third of the cost of small businesses providing employee healthcare.

Funny, but I don’t remember the Republicans ever arguing for the repeal of any of those specific provisions, just the “Obamacare” bogeyman.

Regardless, the autumn Tea Party blitzkrieg to repeal Obamacare really came down to an element of Obamacare that has received little or no mention, except when I mentioned it:  the “affordability credits.”  The government-mandated discounts on health insurance, which generally see to it that you don’t have to pay more than 11 percent of your income for health insurance.  The discounts that the Kaiser Foundation says will save families who buy their own insurance an average of $2,700 each year.  (Actually, to be specific, Kaiser found that 48% who purchase their own insurance will qualify for the affordability credits, and for them, the discounts will save a stunning $5,500 each year.)

That’s what I’m talking about.

Tea Party Republicans were determined – no, engrossed – no, bent — no, obsessed – no, consumed – no, possessed by demons, with the urgent compulsion to prevent the affordability credits from ever going into effect.  Because then, you know, people could afford insurance, which means that they would get the healthcare that they need to stay healthy and alive.  As opposed to the Tea Party chant at one of the Republican Presidential debates – “Let them die!  Let them die!”

You don’t have to take my word for it.  A right-wing columnist in a right-wing newspaper (Byron York of the Washington Examiner) wrote this very revealing statement last July, just before the Tea Party repeal efforts went nuclear:

“The White House knows that once those payments begin, repealing Obamacare will no longer be an abstract question of removing legislation not yet in effect.  Instead, it will be a very real matter of taking money away from people.  It’s very, very hard to do that.

So if you were wondering why the Tea Party went so far as to shut down the Government, and threaten default on the national debt, just to prevent one single aspect of one single government program from being implemented, now you know why.

Look, if you ask people who don’t have health insurance why they don’t have it, 90% say that it’s because they can’t afford it.  Which leaves two options:

  1. Make it affordable.
  2. Tell them to go to hell.

Obamacare represents the first option.  Maniacal efforts to repeal Obamacare represent the second option.

And now, as of January 1, 2014, America is going with the first option.  That’s America’s New Year’s Resolution: “Heal the sick.”

I feel good about that.

Courage,

Rep. Alan Grayson