JUSTICE — MILITARY RECRUITING AND RETENTION ARE THRIVING IN THE MIDST OF DADT REPEAL EFFORTS: Following a White House statement supporting a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) — the military’s policy that bars openly gay members from serving — and Congressional support for ending the policy, it’s been clear for months that DADT repeal is just on the horizon. Opponents of the repeal have been vocal, claiming that lifting the ban could undermine military effectiveness or recruiting efforts. However, “troops are already forced to live in a whole host of disagreeable conditions and train, sleep, and eat with men and women of all races, religions, and values without detriment to unit cohesion or military effectiveness.” And yesterday, the military released its latest recruiting numbers showing that “despite clear Congressional intent to end [DADT], military retention and recruiting continues to thrive.” LGBT rights blog LezGetReal reports that in the month of June, “the Army National Guard met 94% of its recruiting goal and the Air National Guard met 99% of its recruiting goal. The eight other branches or components of the Defense Department met or exceeded their recruiting goals for the month of June 2010.” The Department of Defense also noted, “The services also are at or above their fiscal year-to-date retention goals for the first nine months of fiscal 2010.” The effect of a DADT repeal on recruiting and retention is a “hugely important question” for the Pentagon; its DADT survey, given to 400,000 servicemembers to “gauge their reaction to repealing the policy,” asks, “If Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is repealed, how, if at all, will it affect your willingness to recommend to a family member or close friend that he or she join the military?” The June numbers suggest that there has been no negative effect whatsoever on recruiting due to concerns over repealing DAD
Tag Archives: health care
Most countries fail to deliver on Haiti aid pledges (via Anderson Cooper 360)
Congress- debates/votes on Wall Street Reform …Today!
The Senate Convenes: 9:30amET July, 15 2010
Updates when needed today
Following any Leader remarks, the Senate will resume consideration of the conference report to accompany HR4173, Wall Street Reform. At approximately 11:00am, the Senate will proceed to vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the Wall Street Reform conference report. That will be the first vote of the day. Additional votes are expected during Today session of the Senate.
The vote for cloture 60-38 moves the Wall Street bill forward …i might be cynical but i will get excited about finally moving beyond Wall Street to get Every Street fixed with this somewhat watered down bill Wall Street has let the People down and needs to be reform repaired and reintroduced so that it functions correctly not corruptly. The official record is below…
Votes:
206: Cloture on the conference report to accompany HR4173, Wall Street Reform:
Invoked: 60-38
********************************************************************
The next meeting in the House is scheduled for 10amET July 15, 2010
Cutting Social Security
|
There’s a showdown coming in Washington.
On one side are conservatives and the Blue Dog Democrats. Most of them supported Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy and two unfunded wars.1 But now, they say, we have to focus on the deficit—even if it means cutting Social Security and leaving millions of Americans jobless for years.2
On the other side are progressives who agree we have to rein in our deficits, but think we should do it in a way that protects the middle class and makes Wall Street clean up its own mess.
Here’s the scary part: the conservatives are winning hands down. They’re spending millions of dollars to push their position and hoping that the president’s new deficit commission—which is stacked with conservatives—will strike a deal to cut Social Security before the end of the year.3
If we’re going to have a shot at stopping them, we need to start pushing back right now. So we’re spinning up a massive six-month campaign to make sure we deal with the deficit the right way—by getting the middle class back on their feet and making Wall Street pay its fair share—with polling, hard-hitting ads, and rallies all over the country.
But we need to raise $185,000 to kick it off—which means 64 donations from Seattle. Can you chip in $5?
https://pol.moveon.org/donate/deficit_commission0.html?bg_id=hpc5&id=21761-9640874-7OlEv0x&t=3
Social Security belongs to the American people, who pay into it every working day of our lives. But this election could determine whether conservative budget hawks finally have their way and make deep cuts to our benefits.
And there is a disturbing pattern of conservative fear-mongering on Social Security that is ramping up each day. Most recently it was Republican Leader, John Boehner followed by several other Republican congressmen. And before that former Senator Alan Simpson, the head of a commission that will make recommendations on Social Security this fall, called Americans who rely on Social Security “lesser people.”
That’s why we’re kicking off a major campaign to push back on the lies about Social Security, hold politicians who want to cut it accountable, and get progressive solutions to the deficit—like a bold job creation program or making sure corporations and the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes—on the table.
Here’s some of what we’re planning:
- Deep grassroots organizing: We’re going to organize MoveOn members in races to make sure those on the wrong side of the economy and Social Security hear about it everywhere they go. At the same time, MoveOn members across the country will be making sure that Democrats know that voters want an ambitious jobs program and they expect Wall Street and the super rich to pay their fair share of taxes.
- Polling: We’re planning to poll in critical swing states and districts to show that voters don’t support conservative answers on the economy. We know that voters are more interested in jobs than Social Security cuts but in an election year, the only language that politicians understand is polling. And that’s what we’ll do.
- Ads: We’re going to work on a cutting-edge media program to push out the voices of those who are hurting most in this economy so Washington hears from them directly. Their stories are powerful. And they’ll show politicians that cutting Social Security for the elderly or Medicaid from those who need it most is not the answer voters are looking for.
This is critical work—but the other side is well organized and we need to start right away if we’re going to make an impact. Can you chip in $5?
https://pol.moveon.org/donate/deficit_commission0.html?bg_id=hpc5&id=21761-9640874-7OlEv0x&t=4
Thanks for all you do.
–Nita, Daniel, Duncan, Amy, and the rest of the team
Stopping Monsanto
![]() |
The USDA can stop Monsanto
Although it was reported as a wholesale victory for Monsanto1, the recent Supreme Court decision on “Roundup Ready” alfalfa has actually put food activists in a good position to maintain the ban on Monsanto’s genetically engineered GMO seeds. The court ruled that the planting of GMO alfalfa is still illegal, but it assigned authority to the USDA to determine whether to allow some provisional planting to go forward as soon as next spring. The responsibility for maintaining a total ban on the GMO seeds — and protecting organic crops from likely contamination — falls squarely on the shoulders of USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack. Tell Secretary Vilsack to stand up to corporate agribusiness and protect organics for future generations. Click here to automatically sign the petition. The court supported farmers’ claims that the USDA illegally allowed Monsanto to sell its seeds before a full environmental review could be completed, but Monsanto knows that it can use its power within the USDA to speed up the review process. The company has already requested that the USDA permit a so-called “partial deregulation” that would allow some plantings of Roundup Ready alfalfa before we know the full risks. A landmark element of the recent Supreme Court ruling was its recognition that the USDA must take into account economic harms from genetic contamination of conventional seed by genetically engineered seed — things like the loss of export markets or loss of organic certification, as well as the risks to the environment of this “gene flow” effect. Monsanto wants the agency to ignore those risks and let them plant now. We can’t let them. Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman Peter DeFazio delivered a letter signed by over 50 lawmakers demanding that the USDA not legalize GE alfalfa.2 Over 83,000 Credo members added their voice by calling on their members of Congress to sign on to the letter. Click here to automatically sign the petition and tell Secretary Vilsack to maintain the planting ban on GMO alfalfa, now and in the future. Thank you for standing up for safe and healthy food. Adam Klaus, Campaign Manager |



You must be logged in to post a comment.