Tag Archives: political action

OFA in full effect …


Photos from around the country

From folks advocating reform on Wall Street in Manhattan, to those calling their neighbors in Ohio, to senators’ offices getting calls from across the country, thousands of OFA supporters in every state spoke out with one voice to demand change.

In Greenville, South Carolina, the headline yesterday was about the 50 OFA supporters who attended a “rally to demand Wall Street reforms.” And the Indiana News Center led with “Local Hoosiers ‘Call’ For Wall Street Reform.”

Even better? The stories we got from participants.

Trisha, in Columbus, Wisconsin, called an elderly neighbor. As she tells it, “I asked him if he’d ever contacted a member of Congress. He said ‘no’ he hadn’t. Then after a short pause he said, ‘Well, just what was that number? I guess there’s a first time for everything. I’ll make that call!'”

After meeting in front of the library in Branigan, New Mexico, Evelyn — an OFA Neighborhood Team Leader — said that she and other volunteers “talked to people passing by about the importance of standing up to the power brokers and the lobbyists and the big banks. What I love the most is when you really get to have a conversation and inform someone about what’s really going on — they are so appreciative of getting straight-forward information.”

And at an event on Wall Street itself, a volunteer named Erin said that “I am here today to stand up for the everyday people who work and raise families and don’t want to have their lives disrupted as a result of Wall Street’s reckless practices.”

Everything you did this week made a difference. That’s why Wall Street reform legislation is picking up steam — there could even be final votes as early as next week.

We’ll be in touch soon with more ways you can help push reform through the final stretch.

Thanks for all you do,

Jeremy

Jeremy Bird
Deputy Director
Organizing for America


2010 Highlighted Programs from Matter of Trust


GULF OIL SPILL – HOW EVERYONE CAN HELP

Anyone and Everyone: salons, groomers, individuals can sign up to donate hair and fur clippings and nylons for our Oil Spill Booms. Our Excess Access program sign up is FREE, fast and helps us to coordinate the masses of donations.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP TO DONATE HAIR / FUR / NYLONS and get a delivery address emailed. Warehouses are small, so we’re not posting on the web, we’re orchestrating how much goes where all along the Coast. We all get it. We shampoo because hair collects oil!

Thousands of pounds of hair and nylons are coming in by UPS and FED EX from every State in the US and from Canada, Brazil, France, UK… Booms are being made all along the Gulf Coast near beaches and marshes. What a community feeling! More Info

Natural Surplus Programs
Our Natural Surplus programs concentrate on materials that are found abundantly in nature.

OIL SPILL HAIRBOOMS AND HAIRMATS
Here we look at fibers (hair, wool, fur, feathers…). Thousands of salons and groomers mail us hair clippings, swept up off their floors. The fibers are stuffed into nylons to make booms or woven into hair mats. We all know about shampooing our oily hair, but it took Phill McCrory, a stylist from Alabama, to realize that hair was an efficient and abundant material for collecting and containing petroleum spills. More

cynthia…. bins
Byron Cleary holds up oil soaked hairmat at San Francisco, Cosco Busan Oil Spill.
Help us close the loop by creating green collar jobs and composting / remediating oily hairmats and booms after spills.


Manmade Surplus Programs

You can visit our many Manmade Surplus programs that focus on reuse of manufactured surplus items and materials. Our largest program is ROSA (Reuse Of Society’s Abundance) and its online database Excess Access for matching nonprofit wish lists with business and household donations of second hand furniture, clothes, toys…

Eco-Educational Programs
Kindly browse our many Eco-Educational programs that focus on spreading awareness about sustainable and environmental solutions such as

efaEARTH FROM ABOVE-USA
Matter of Trust is the fiscal sponsor for Earth From Above-USA. This breathtaking collection of large-scale aerial  photography by world-renowned French environmentalist, Yann Arthus-Bertrand. A visual record for future generations, this outdoor public art exhibition presents awe-inspiring portraits of our planet, and a new perspective on the need for sustainable living. Free-to-the-public, day and night, experiential, and green by design, the 8-week exhibition features 150 images from around the globe captioned by sustainable development experts.

GREEN ENERGY MILLIONS (GEMs) CAMPAIGN
You can join in our Green Energy Millions (GEMs) campaign to create the tipping point. Our goal is 100,000,000 commitments to incorporate easy, green lifestyle benefits. Yep, 100 Million, and it’s OK if we get more! It’s FREE, it’s FAST and it’s FUN!

Q&A: Facebook exec defends site’s privacy policies By Sharon Gaudin


Computerworld – Social networking giant Facebook has been taking it hard on the chin lately as critics contend that recent upgrades to the site and a bug that lets users view their friends’ chat sessions raise a bevy of privacy issues.

However, in an interview with Computerworld yesterday, one Facebook executive insisted that users are happy with recent changes to the site despite the hornet’s nest of controversy stirred up by online pundits and commentators. Ethan Beard, director of Facebook’s developer network, noted that the millions of users that have joined Facebook’s social network did so specifically to share information.

Beard also talked about the social network’s controversial privacy settings, why users’ information isn’t private by default, and reports that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that people shouldn’t expect online privacy.

What was the glitch this week that exposed private chats? I don’t know the specifics of it. We take privacy very, very seriously here. We try to give out users control over the privacy of their data. At times you’re going to have technical issues that we will work to address very, very quickly.

Were you surprised by the level of criticism of Facebook’s plan to allow user information to be shared with third-party Web sites? In some ways, yes. We think a lot about our users and privacy when we’re building products. Our goal is to make sure we’re delighting users. I think the response from users that we’ve seen from the products we launched at [Facebook’s F8 developer conference late last month] has been quite positive. People are actively opting-in to engage with the social Web. The response from users speaks very, very loudly that they love what we’re doing. I think there’s a lot of other talk that’s not coming from users necessarily. There’s been a lot of interest from the media, from organizations and officials. But to be honest, the user response has been overwhelmingly positive.

Are you saying the outrage has centered in the press? I can’t say where it’s coming from, but our users are very happy with it.

How do you respond to those who say Facebook’s privacy settings are complicated and confusing to navigate through? I think that privacy is a complicated matter and each individual’s view on privacy and how one thinks about it is quite nuanced. How I think about privacy and how I want to share my information is probably quite different from you. It requires us to create very sophisticated tools to deal with all these nuances and give people the control they want. It’s quite complicated, so you end up with sophisticated controls, which end up being fairly complicated to use. We try to walk a balance between the two.

Are you working on ways to make the privacy settings easier to use? We’re always looking to make our controls better and simpler to use. We don’t have any specific changes to talk about right now.

Wouldn’t switching from having users opt-out of strong privacy setting solve some of the issues? The reason that people use Facebook is to share information with their friends and to connect with things that are important to them. Sharing is not inherently a private activity. Frequently, we’ve found is that people want to share more and more broadly. You can’t start completely private. That doesn’t serve the purpose of helping people share information.

Do the concerns of U.S. Senators raise the stakes of the Facebook privacy debate? It’s a testament to the impact that we’re having on the world.

How can Facebook and social networks in general maintain today’s phenomenal growth and avoid becoming simply a fad like the pet rock? The social aspect of what’s going on in the Web is not new. Before the Internet, the first apps built … were to communicate. E-mail was one of the first. [Finding ways] to connect with people and share with people has been going on for thousands and thousands of years. The information we really care about is the information we share with each other. I don’t think that’s a fad. I think it’s part of a longer-term historical trend.

What new features are you working on now? We worked pretty hard to get everything ready for F8 two weeks ago. To be honest, we’re catching a bit of a breather.

Has the recent reports that Facebook CEO Zuckerberg said he doesn’t care about privacy caused much trouble for the company? I don’t think Mark Zuckerberg really said that. The amount of time, energy, effort and resources to make sure that our users have control is a testament to how importnt it is that our users have privacy. Anything to the contrary is not true.

Sharon Gaudin covers the Internet and Web 2.0, emerging technologies, and desktop and laptop chips for Computerworld. Follow Sharon on Twitter at Twitter@sgaudin, or subscribe to Sharon’s RSS feed Gaudin RSS. Her e-mail address is sgaudin@computerworld.com.

What is Fox afraid of? Veterans? Clean energy?


There’s an ad that Fox News doesn’t think you should see. The bigwigs at Fox just don’t get it, and they think you aren’t smart enough to get it either — so they’ve refused to run it.

Fox reportedly turned down as “too confusing” an ad from the progressive veterans’ group VoteVets.org — one that explained how passing clean energy legislation is good for our nation’s security. The VoteVets.org ad states that a clean-energy agenda reduces the power oil-producing dictatorships like Iran can exercise over the United States by reducing our dependence on oil.

Confused? Fox News is. It’s absolutely baffled.

Click here to tell Fox: Run VoteVets.org’s ad.

However, Fox hasn’t proved incapable of grasping the arguments of ads funded by right-wing groups, like an ad from the Employment Policies Institute featuring children pledging allegiance to “America’s debt.” And it has no problem running ads arguing that the only defense against “an economic meltdown” is a “Survival Seed Bank,” or offering convicted felon G. Gordon Liddy’s advice on buying gold.

So maybe “too confusing” is a laughably thin excuse for Fox to block a message that contradicts its own political activism. Maybe what it’s worried about is presenting a message that counters its outright political advocacy and the myths it sells every day on foreign policy and energy policy.

So it’s been decided: Fox News just won’t run the ad.

That’s not acceptable. If Fox wants to contend that it’s a news organization and not a political machine, it needs to treat all advertisers equally, not pick and choose based on transparently political motives.

Click here to tell Fox: Run VoteVets.org’s ad.

Thank you for your efforts to hold Fox News accountable.

Eric Burns
President, Media Matters for America

Primaries matter … 2010


How often do we all hear how the GOP will be picking up a significant amount of seats in Congress … we have a special election coming up for Hawaii.  And to make it even more complicated, in the Hawaii election not only is there a Republican on the ballot, but Republican voters will be voting too. That means, it’s two Democrats vs. one Republican but only one winner takes it all.

The  Democratic Party needs to get out in front of any election, plan for transportation and do whatever helps to GOTV, which goes without saying but then  …

This morning a Msnbc host stated that his party(Republican)…should do whatever it takes to win but do it quietly and behind closed doors… Dems need to give all the Community Organizers available the tools to win any and all elections …special or not.  My take is that most Democrats get involved in major elections but it’s a new day, now everyone should get involved at every level to keep Democrats in office on track to getting our broken down system back on track.  We all know what happened and who shoved us toward an enormous ditch; they bet and spent, spent, spent  money without enforcing regulations.  While it’s possible a lot of people saw the problem no one did a thing until it was too late and passed it on to the next Administration.

So, what’s my point to Primaries matter? This is not the time to move away from Democratic ideology, move away from getting things done unlike Republicans, it’s not the time to give up. We have to demand action from Congress.  We need to move into the 21st Century; while Republicans fight to keep us from progressing into a country that has health care for all, climate change because we care about our earth, our children.  We need to demand regulations and financial reform for a failed financial system that they took advantage of. Congress needs to make a good faith effort to reform the way people come into the US … immigration is not going away and the Arizona laws definitely are a catalyst