Tag Archives: Rhode Island

We’re no better than Ferguson; maybe worse


Seattle Times staff columnist

Mayor Ed Murray says “Seattle is not Ferguson.” In countless ways I’m sure he’s right, except for this very important one: It’s just as unlikely for cops to get charged for bad deeds here as it is in supposedly backward Missouri.

In fact we’re arguably worse than Ferguson.

No offense to the thousands of protesters marching on behalf of Michael Brown. But what has stood out to me is how the Ferguson case isn’t nearly as flagrant as recent police-brutality cases here in progressive Puget Sound.

In Ferguson, the police officer, Darren Wilson, had a good case to make that he was under some level of assault. If it’s true that Brown slugged the officer through the squad-car door and tried to wrestle away his gun — as the officer and some witnesses attest — then getting even a low-level manslaughter charge to stick against the officer would be next to impossible.

The Ferguson case is supercharged by that region’s racial history. But still — compare the facts of it to what happened in Seattle to John T. Williams in 2010. Ferguson isn’t on the same radar screen of outrageousness.

Unlike Brown, Williams didn’t assault anyone or do anything hostile, beyond toting his carving knife with a wood block and maybe looking menacingly in a police officer’s direction. The officer, Ian Birk, told him to drop the knife. When Williams didn’t — perhaps because he couldn’t hear — Birk shot five times and killed him.

Even the police department called that “egregious.” Yet no charges were filed. Our outgoing U.S. attorney, Jenny Durkan, this week compared that case to Ferguson in an article she wrote for The Washington Post, headlined: “As a federal prosecutor I know how hard it is to charge officers like Darren Wilson.”

An officer has to have malice or willfully bad intent to be convicted, she wrote. It’s an incredibly high bar. “Accident, mistake, fear, negligence or bad judgment is not sufficient,” Durkan wrote when declining to charge Birk.

You can see why the chances of Darren Wilson getting convicted by the state or the feds in Ferguson would be near zero.

We’ve had other baffling cases, such as Christopher Harris, a completely innocent man who mistakenly ran from police in Belltown in 2009 and then was shoved into a wall so hard it paralyzed him for life. The officer who did that not only wasn’t charged, but remained on the force.

But one case here was so extreme that prosecutors took the rare step of charging the officer. Troy Meade, of the Everett police, had shot an aggressive drunken driver, Niles Meservey, seven times from behind, killing him. The officer’s conduct was so questionable that a fellow officer did something unheard of: He crossed the blue line to testify against his mate, claiming the force Meade used was both excessive and vindictive.

Yet Meade was acquitted of second-degree murder by a jury in 2011. The officer argued the car was about to back up and hit him, and because the law puts such a premium on this state of mind defense, he walked.

My point isn’t to bash our local cops. These were isolated cases and don’t reflect on other officers.

But the narrative that’s developed out of Ferguson is that the officer there wasn’t charged because the system is inherently racist. Parts of it may be, but more so it’s just incredibly pro-cop. It lets them walk pretty much no matter what.

Durkan writes it’s this way for a legitimate reason: “We want police to be able to make split second decisions necessary to protect us.” That is crucial.

But in the Williams shooting in particular, it tilted too far. If there was nothing wrong legally with what happened to him, then it’s hard to imagine anything with the police ever being legally wrong.

Ferguson is bringing up an important debate about racial inequality.

But the case is too murky to support a national movement on police accountability.

We’ve had much starker ones right here. Seattle may be more Ferguson than Ferguson.

Danny Westneat’s column appears Wednesday and Sunday. Reach him at 206-464-2086 or dwestneat@seattletimes.com

Pregnant and pink-slipp​ed?


NWLCHands-Circle-180Emily J. Martin, National Women’s Law CenterWe get calls all the time.

 
Calls from pregnant workers whose employers have given them an impossible choice: They can either lose their jobs or endanger their pregnancies.
Why is this still happening? Well, when it comes to pregnant workers, employers and courts are misunderstanding the law.
Enough is enough. Tell the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to issue strong and clear guidance on reasonable job accommodations for the pregnant workers who need them.
Without clear guidance, pregnant workers who need a temporary change on the job are often treated worse than employees with similar limitations arising out of disability or injury. For example, many workplaces give a worker with a back injury a temporary reprieve from having to lift heavy objects — but if a pregnant worker asks for the same accommodation, she could be fired.
The consequences for pregnant workers can be devastating. Here are just three examples of women featured in a new report issued today by NWLC and A Better Balance:

  • A pregnant fast-food worker in Washington, D.C., was fired after her employer refused to let her drink water on the job.
  • A pregnant cashier at a Dollar Tree store wasn’t allowed to sit on a stool, even though workers in other Dollar Tree stores did. Instead, she was required to stand for 8 to 10 hours at a stretch — which landed her in the emergency room.
  • When a pregnant truck driver in Maryland asked for help with occasional heavy lifting, she was forced onto unpaid leave — and she lost her health insurance.

These stories didn’t have to have a bad ending. These women just needed temporary adjustments to their jobs to continue working — the same sorts of adjustments their employers routinely provided to co-workers with disabilities or injuries.
Pregnant workers can’t wait. It’s time for the EEOC to issue strong and clear guidance on employers’ legal obligation to accommodate pregnant workers.
Send your message now.
Thanks again for all of your support.
Sincerely,

Emily J. Martin Emily J. Martin Vice President and General Counsel National Women’s Law Center    

P.S. Want to read more? Check out NWLC and A Better Balance’s new report featuring personal accounts of women who lost their jobs, health insurance and more — and women who had no choice but to keep working and risk their health.

No More Waiting


By

President Obama Is Moving Forward On Executive Action That Could Halt 5 Million Deportations

President Obama will disregard Republican complaints and sign an executive action that could shield up to five million immigrants from deportation, the New York Times reports. The official announcement would “significantly refocus the activities of the government’s 12,000 immigration agents,” and could be made as early as next week.

The first piece of the order, according to White House officials, will be to protect the parents of children who are American citizens or legal residents from deportation by allowing them to obtain legal work permits. Depending on whether the order is limited to parents who have been undocumented and living in the United States for five years or for ten years, it could affect between 2.5 million and 3.3 million people. The President is reported to be considering a second piece to extend protections to immigrants who came here as children, and to their parents. This could affect up to one million or more additional undocumented immigrants.

The action will also clarify who should be high priority and low priority for deportation, in order to focus enforcement on violent criminals instead of breaking up families. Finally, it will also enhance border security and expand opportunities for immigrants with high-tech skills.

It’s not the comprehensive immigration reform that the Senate passed and the American people support, but it’s a very important step. And it upholds President Obama’s promise last week after the midterms that he won’t “just wait” for Republicans to stop stalling on the issue.

BOTTOM LINE: President Obama’s commitment to move forward with an executive action to halt deportations is an important step toward helping to fix our broken immigration system. But it does not remove the pressure from Congressional Republicans to do what the American people want and pass comprehensive immigration reform.

Your Update from the White House Business Team


 The White House

As we move into the fall, we have been quite busy here at the White House. President Obama is traveling in Asia this week. On Tuesday, he and President Xi Jinping of China jointly announced a plan to cooperate on climate change and clean energy. Combined, the U.S. and China account for more than one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions. Going forward, both countries agreed to set aggressive targets to reduce emissions, marking the first time China has agreed to cap its CO2 emissions. Read the fact sheet and joint announcement on climate change.

Earlier this week, the U.S. and China also agreed to increase the validity of short-term tourist and business visas issued to each other’s citizens. With 1.8 million Chinese travelers visiting the United States annually, China is the fastest-growing outbound tourism market in the world. Tourist activity from China contributes roughly $21.1 billion to the U.S. economy and supports more than 109,000 American jobs. This week’s agreement will provide a significant boost to these numbers and the travel and tourism industry overall.

Finally, on Monday, the President made an important announcement regarding net neutrality, urging the FCC to implement the strongest possible rules to safeguard the Internet.

You can read more about these issues below. As always, please don’t hesitate to be in touch with any questions or concerns at Business@who.eop.gov.

The White House Business Team,

Ari, Nate, Sam, and Quinn

U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change and Clean Energy Cooperation

Building on strong progress during the first six years of the Administration, President Obama announced a new target on Tuesday to cut net greenhouse gas emissions 26-28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. At the same time, President Xi Jinping of China announced targets to peak CO2 emissions around 2030, with the intention to try to peak early, and to increase the non-fossil fuel share of all energy to around 20 percent by 2030.

Together, the U.S. and China account for more than one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions. Tuesday’s joint announcement, the culmination of months of bilateral dialogue, highlights the critical role the two countries must play in addressing climate change. The actions they announced are part of the longer-range effort to achieve the deep decarbonization of the global economy over time. These actions will also inject momentum into the global climate negotiations on the road to reaching a successful new climate agreement next year in Paris.

See the fact sheet, and read the joint announcement from President Obama and President Xi.

President Obama holds a press conference with President Xi.

President Barack Obama and President Xi Jinping of China hold a press conference at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, Nov. 12, 2014. (Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy)

President Obama Urges the FCC to Implement Stronger Net Neutrality Rules

On Monday, President Obama asked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to take up the strongest possible rules to protect net neutrality, the principle that says Internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all Internet traffic equally.

The President has been a strong and consistent advocate of net neutrality throughout his Presidency. His plan would reclassify consumer broadband services under what’s known as Title II of the Telecommunications Act. It would serve as a “basic acknowledgement of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone — not just one or two companies.”

Read the full plan, and watch President Obama explain why these steps are so important.

President Obama talks about net neutrality.

Supporting American Job Growth and Strengthening Ties by Extending U.S.-China Visa Validity for Tourists, Business Travelers, and Students

On Monday, President Obama announced that the U.S. and China are concluding a reciprocal visa validity arrangement during his visit that will strengthen our ever-broadening economic and people-to-people ties. Both countries have agreed to increase the validity of short-term tourist and business visas issued to each other’s citizens from one to ten years — the longest validity possible under U.S. law — and increase the validity of student and exchange visas from one to five years. The United States began issuing visas in accordance with the new reciprocal agreement yesterday.

This arrangement will improve trade, investment, and business ties by facilitating travel and offering easier access to both economies. Extended validity visas for students and exchange visitors will boost the bonds between our two peoples and facilitate travel for outstanding students from around the world who attend U.S. institutions of higher education. As a result of this arrangement, the United States hopes to welcome a growing share of eligible Chinese travelers, inject billions in the U.S. economy and create enough demand to support hundreds of thousands of additional U.S. jobs. Travelers will continue to be subject to all the same legal and security reviews that currently apply to visa applicants.

See the fact sheet here.

President Obama speaks at the APEC CEO Summit.

President Barack Obama delivers remarks during the APEC CEO Summit at the Chinese National Convention Center in Beijing, China, Nov. 10, 2014. Seated on stage is Andrew Liveris, President, Chairman & CEO of The Dow Chemical Company. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Supporting Economic Growth at Home and Abroad by Eliminating Trade Barriers on Information Technology Products

At the APEC leaders meeting on Monday, President Obama announced that the U.S. and China had reached an understanding on a bilateral agreement on expanding the scope of goods covered by the Information Technology Agreement (ITA). This agreement paves the way for the resumption and swift conclusion of the first major tariff-cutting deal at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 17 years, and promises a major boost to U.S. technology exports and the jobs that support them.

In remarks at the APEC plenary session, President Obama praised the agreement as an important step in completing the final ITA agreement:

It was APEC’s work that led to the Information Technology Agreement, which we are now negotiating to expand. So, it is fitting that we are here with our APEC colleagues to share the news that the United States and China have reached an understanding that we hope will contribute to a rapid conclusion of the broader negotiations in Geneva.

See the fact sheet here.

President Obama speaks at a TPP meeting.

President Barack Obama, with U.S. Trade Representative Mike Froman, delivers remarks during a TPP meeting at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, China, Nov. 10, 2014. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Accelerating Advanced Manufacturing in America

The President recently participated in a meeting with his American Manufacturing Partnership (AMP) Steering Committee. AMP — led by its co-chairs, Dow’s Andrew Liveris and MIT’s Rafael Reif — presented its final report with a set of new recommendations. In addition to discussing the recommendations, the meeting was an opportunity for the President and AMP Steering Committee members to discuss the additional policy steps the President is taking to respond to them. Read the fact sheet on new actions taken to further strengthen manufacturing here.

The President created AMP — a working group of 19 leaders in industry, academia, and labor — in June 2011 as part of his continuing effort to maintain the competitive edge on emerging technologies and invest in the future of our manufacturing sector. We’ve come a long way since then, and the policies fueled by AMP’s recommendations have been a big contributor to that progress.

Read the rest of the article by Secretary Pritzker to see the progress we’ve made.

 

The U.S. and China #ActOnClim​ate


The U.S. and China #ActOnClimate

Last night in Beijing, President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping made a historic joint announcement on the United States’ and China’s new targets to reduce carbon pollution.

As the world’s two largest economies — and the world’s two biggest carbon emitters — the announcement is a unique development in the U.S.-China relationship. Both countries have joined together to demonstrate leadership on an issue that touches the entire world.

“There’s one issue that will define the contours of this century more dramatically than any other,” President Obama said earlier this year. “And that is the urgent and growing threat of a changing climate.”

Find out more about the historic new actions to reduce carbon pollution here.

Find out more here.

 

 

You Can Check Out Health Care Plans and Prices for 2015 Right Now

The season approaches. Not just the holiday season — it’s time to get ready for open enrollment season, too! What is open enrollment? Beginning on November 15, you will have 92 days to shop for health care insurance and find the coverage that best suits your needs.

READ MORE

President Obama Heads to Beijing, Kicking Off Trip to Asia and Australia

Over the weekend, President Obama headed to Beijing to kick off his sixth trip to Asia as President — and his second trip to Asia this year.

READ MORE

A Free and Open Internet: What You Need to Know About Net Neutrality

Here are some answers to key questions about net neutrality and what the President is doing to ensure a free and open Internet.

READ MORE