What We Should Have Been Talking About

One of the more frustrating elements of the debate about Obamacare is that the Right Wing has dictated the terms of that debate.

Resolved: Does American Want Socialized Medicine?

While the Obamacare legislation was being legislated, the debate was about “socialized medicine.”  As if.  Obamacare is no more a government takeover of healthcare than air traffic control is a government takeover of the skies.   Or traffic lights are a government takeover of the roads.  (Although the Post Office is, in fact, a government takeover of the mail.  Cue to Tea Partiers blowing up their own mailboxes.)

Resolved: Is Obamacare Unconstitional?

Then there was that interminable debate about whether Obamacare is constitutional.  Let me get this straight: are you telling me that it is constitutional for the Government to draft your rear-end and ship you to Vietnam to serve as cannon fodder, but somehow it isn’t constitutional for the Government to make you pay for your own emergency-room care?  Oh, come on!  If it’s constitutional for the Government to put you in prison if you fail to buy car insurance, then surely it’s constitutional for the Government to make you pay a fee if you fail to buy health insurance.

Resolved: Isn’t the Obamacare Website Absolutely Sucktastic?

And now the Tea Partiers are shedding crocodile tears over the Obamacare website.  The website that they tried to repeal, on 40+ different occasions.  The website that went live on the very day that they shut down the federal government.  Because, you know, they get really upset if there is any delay in people obtaining Obamacare coverage, since they don’t want anyone ever to have it.

Why?  Why did the Right Wing go to such lengths to dictate the Obamacare debate?  Because if you’re obsessing over government takeovers, and constitutionality, and a website, then you aren’t ever taking about:

• closing the “donut hole” in prescription drug coverage for seniors;
• extending coverage and care to 40 million people with preexisting conditions;
• prohibiting insurance companies from literally pulling the plug on patients whose care becomes too expensive;
• allowing young adults up to the age of 26 to remain on their parents’ health insurance policies;
• eliminating deductibles and copayments for ordinary care for seniors;
• mandating refunds for seniors who are overcharged under the Medicare Advantage program;
• eliminating useless and predatory “junk” coverage;
• prohibiting overcharging on the basis of gender;
• preventing employers who don’t offer insurance coverage from making employers who do offer coverage feel like suckers and fools;
• extending Medicaid to the working poor; and
• paying over one-third of the cost of small businesses providing employee healthcare.

Funny, but I don’t remember the Republicans ever arguing for the repeal of any of those specific provisions, just the “Obamacare” bogeyman.

Regardless, the autumn Tea Party blitzkrieg to repeal Obamacare really came down to an element of Obamacare that has received little or no mention, except when I mentioned it:  the “affordability credits.”  The government-mandated discounts on health insurance, which generally see to it that you don’t have to pay more than 11 percent of your income for health insurance.  The discounts that the Kaiser Foundation says will save families who buy their own insurance an average of $2,700 each year.  (Actually, to be specific, Kaiser found that 48% who purchase their own insurance will qualify for the affordability credits, and for them, the discounts will save a stunning $5,500 each year.)

That’s what I’m talking about.

Tea Party Republicans were determined – no, engrossed – no, bent — no, obsessed – no, consumed – no, possessed by demons, with the urgent compulsion to prevent the affordability credits from ever going into effect.  Because then, you know, people could afford insurance, which means that they would get the healthcare that they need to stay healthy and alive.  As opposed to the Tea Party chant at one of the Republican Presidential debates – “Let them die!  Let them die!”

You don’t have to take my word for it.  A right-wing columnist in a right-wing newspaper (Byron York of the Washington Examiner) wrote this very revealing statement last July, just before the Tea Party repeal efforts went nuclear:

“The White House knows that once those payments begin, repealing Obamacare will no longer be an abstract question of removing legislation not yet in effect.  Instead, it will be a very real matter of taking money away from people.  It’s very, very hard to do that.“

So if you were wondering why the Tea Party went so far as to shut down the Government, and threaten default on the national debt, just to prevent one single aspect of one single government program from being implemented, now you know why.

Look, if you ask people who don’t have health insurance why they don’t have it, 90% say that it’s because they can’t afford it.  Which leaves two options:

1. Make it affordable.
2. Tell them to go to hell.

Obamacare represents the first option.  Maniacal efforts to repeal Obamacare represent the second option.

And now, as of January 1, 2014, America is going with the first option.  That’s America’s New Year’s Resolution: “Heal the sick.”

I feel good about that.

Courage,

Rep. Alan Grayson

Português | Español | Deutsch | More

Wow! We’re just thrilled to enter the New Year knowing that we have your support – we so appreciate your interest in our work and commitment to our leading campaigns for justice, indigenous rights and defending the Amazon. Your partnership with Amazon Watch is a clear indication that the global movement to protect the Amazon is growing. Thank YOU! As we kick off 2014, Amazon Watch is right where we need to be – on the ground and on the job. Because of your support of our mi­­ssion, and with our partners, we’re bounding into this exciting year with campaigns already in full stride, a brilliant new initiative, and strengthened capacity to fuel the forces. If you haven’t yet made an investment in the future of the Amazon and our global climate, all we can say is please do. There is no better way to start the new year than to invest in a greener, healthier and more just planet than by joining Amazon Watch as we work together to defend the rainforest and advance the rights of its indigenous guardians. Your contribution makes a powerful difference to: Stop dams that threaten Brazil’s Amazon and to promote clean renewable energy. Protect Ecuador’s Amazon and Yasuní National Park from the government’s continued attempts to strip indigenous communities’ rights. Hold Chevron to the high court judgment against it and demand that it clean up the toxic mess it’s responsible for in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Increase capacity and collaboration among Peru’s indigenous peoples to claim their rights and halt attempts at dirty projects that would destroy the Peruvian Amazon. Embark on a bold new cross-border effort with indigenous peoples throughout Peru and Ecuador to protect the Sacred Headwaters of the Amazon. We can’t wait to share more with you as this courageous campaign takes shape and gathers momentum! Your partnership means the world to us. Thank you. For the Amazon, The team at Amazon Watch

So, I am a person of colour my family’s coffee table always had jet, essence and all the usual magazines made for us and purchased delivered by mail… now they online.. ha. I definitely loved reading them,  absorbed the information and admit that there have been times in my life when I put  some ( poc ) magazines in time out or just stopped reading them for a long while.

However, in 2009 a great couple was being featured by other magazines, but Essence seemed to have the best and entertaining write-up on Obama’s family, and have been reading it ever since. I even went out of my way to score a free 1yr subscription by racking up some reward points but today … ah. Today, I received the Feb issue which is devoted to Black History Month with a tribute to Mandela and the cover was given to Steve Harvey … great! love him and his family.

Yet, as I thumbed through the magazine, an article in the hot topics section popped out at me.  The Forgotten: Black, Female, and Uninsured with a heartbreaking graphic of a woman and a little girl looking worried. I had to read more, but something was missing as I read the intro. It stated as many as 8 million Americans; Single working Black women have discovered they are ineligible to participate in the ACA program. If that wasn’t bad enough, retirees and Nursing Assistants were not only struggling to survive but might not get the health care they need. Ok, I started to get mad at the issue mad that these women were turned away …but stopped. I know women can get ACA , we are what I call the demographic for the ACA program, what the heck is missing from this, then there it was. Apparently, all of these women live in the south where 25 states refused Medicaid lest we talk about Obamacare, while many other states are discouraging and making it tough for their constituents to talk to navigators to get Affordable Care …or Obamacare.

The ACA specifically, among other things, eliminates discrimination and labeling a woman as a pre-existing condition… which women are considered because we can have children.  Anyway, suffice it to say I felt slightly peeved the article seemed somewhat misleading, though it had stories about what obstacles women were facing and was reported in great detail as some readers could relate and learn what they might need to do. Yet, for someone who actually knows about the ACA, it was tough reading how their so-called Public Servants have stood in the way of women who need health care now.  The powers that be have done a great job at putting these women and 8 million other lives at risk from diseases and illnesses  …. Why?

The article left me with a sick feeling because it gave the reader a great idea as to how the ACA is being treated in the South. It takes us inside the lives of these women who are in need, it also left me feeling like by the end of the article they still didn’t know how ACA worked or have answers they needed about how and where to sign up for ACA or if they were eventually nudged into the right direction by some helpful soul.  The article even had comments from a health care official who said the govt marketplace is available and that seems to be ignored.  Ultimately, I was somewhat disappointed in the article; it was an opportunity to find the resources for the women who probably could tell their friends and so on …