Our Gilded Age


Americans’ Views On Income Inequality

oxfamCREDIT: OXFAM

Add this stunning figure to the long list of evidence detailing the extent of the yawning economic gap between the wealthy and everyone else: Oxfam calculates that the 85 richest people have as much as wealth as the bottom 50 percent of the world’s population — 3.5 billion people.

Thanks in part to incredible numbers like these, Americans have become more aware of income inequality and want an economy that works for everyone, not the just richest few, since we know the economy doesn’t actually work when it’s only working for the wealthy. A new poll from USA Today/Pew Research Center released today confirmed this — and demonstrated that a wide majority of Americans believe that government can and should play an important role to reduce the gap.

Here are some of the key takeaways:

1. Americans broadly agree that the income gap has increased. Among those polled, 65 percent think that gap between the rich and everyone else has increased over the last 10 years. And factually, they would be correct. Take a look at the chart below showing how the rich keep getting richer through the economic recovery:

incomegap

2. A vast majority want government to do something about it. Americans disagree with the Republicans in Congress who continue to insist that government can’t help alleviate income inequality. In fact, seven in ten respondents believe the government should play a role in helping reduce this gap — 43 percent saying “a lot.” Meanwhile, a similar 38 percent think government programs and policies can do “a lot” to reduce the income gap.

govtrole2CREDIT: USA TODAY

3. The government can and should reduce poverty. In the survey, 82 percent of respondents said that the government should do “a lot” or “some” to reduce poverty. Almost the same number (77 percent) said that government policies and programs can do “a lot” or “some” to reduce poverty.

4. A majority doesn’t buy the argument that being poor has to do with lack of effort. In fact, when it comes to what gets the blame if a person is poor, there is a 15-point edge for “circumstances beyond his or her control”  over “lack of effort.” A strikingly similar margin exists on Americans opinion when it comes to more to do with a person being rich: 51 percent cite “more advantages in life than most other people,” while just 38 percent say “worked harder than most other people.”

richpoorCREDIT: USA TODAY

5. Policies that will lift people out of poverty and reduce income inequality have strong support. An overwhelming 73 percent of respondents favor raising the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 — including a majority (53 percent) of Republicans. Americans disagree with Republicans in Congress who recently refused to extend emergency unemployment insurance to millions of Americans — 63 percent would like to see that program extended for another year. And finally, 54 percent overall would raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations to expand programs for the poor.

This new poll confirms the findings of other research, including a recent poll and report from our colleagues at the Half in Ten project.

BOTTOM LINE: Income inequality is as bad as it’s ever been in this country. But Americans do believe that there are things we can and should do to help reduce the gap between the rich and everyone else in order to create an economy that works for everyone, not just the wealthy few. And economy that works for everyone will benefit everyone: it’s as simple as that.

U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)


01/16/2014 09:00 AM EST
FDA has learned that some wart removal products for use at home have caught fire during use.
Learn how to use cryogenic (removal by freezing) wart removal products safely and other options for removing warts.
Read the Consumer Update to learn more.

Panasonic’s … Solar Project


http://cotd.panasonic.net/about/ 

Design Lampshades for Solar Lanterns to Help People in Need

During Panasonic’s Cut Out the Darkness project, visitors to the company’s website can design lampshades for solar lanterns that will be donated to regions without electricity. Photo: Panasonic
Want to light up the life of someone who needs it? Now you can. Panasonic’s Cut Out the Darkness project allows visitors to the company’s website to design lampshades that could be sent along with solar lanterns to those who live in areas without access to electricity.

READ MORE »

“by the way, we have to fix that.”


By 

How to Improve Access to Voting, Everywhere

On election night in 2012, a newly re-elected President Barack Obama uttered an important aside in his speech: “I want to thank every American who participated in this election. Whether you voted for the very first time — or waited in line for a very long time — by the way, we have to fix that.” Sticking to his word, Obama went on to issue an executive order forming a nonpartisan Presidential Commission on Election Administration to, in his words, “improve the voting experience in America.”

Almost a year later, that commission — chaired by the top attorneys from both the Obama and Romney campaigns — has issued a series of recommendations based on six months of study. Overall, the report calls for the creation of a new national standard: “no citizen should have to wait more than 30 minutes to vote.” The recommendations focus primarily on two categories of improving voter access: expanding access to the ballot box in an effort to reduce lines, and modernizing voting procedures and equipment.

Here are some of the more noteworthy specific recommendations offered by the commission, via the Huffington Post:

  • An expansion of online voter registration by the states to enhance both accuracy of the voter rolls and efficiency;
  • The expansion of voting before Election Day, recognizing that the majority of states now provide either mail balloting or in-person early voting and that voters are increasingly seeking these options;
  • The increased use of schools as polling places, since they are the best-equipped facilities in most jurisdictions, with security concerns met by scheduling an in-service training day for students and teachers on Election Day;
  • Recognizing and addressing the impending crisis in voting technology as machines bought 10 years ago with post-2000 federal funds wear out and require replacement with no federal appropriations on the horizon;
  • To usher in this needed next generation of equipment, reforming the standards and certification process to allow innovation and the adoption of widely available and significantly less expensive off-the-shelf technologies and “software-only” solutions;
  • Assuring that polling places are accessible to all voters, are located close to where voters live and are designed to function smoothly;
  • Increasing and enhancing training and recruitment of poll workers, in the recognition that volunteer poll workers are voters’ primary source of contact during the actual voting process.

The commission also called for improving the data collected about election administration and voting machine performance so policymakers can better assess actual election administration performance against ideals.

The bipartisan commission stayed away from the most controversial issue surrounding voting: voter ID law. But many of these recommendations are an important validation of the work of many voting rights advocates. They are also an explicit rebuke to some conservative state governments that have taken steps to reduce voting access by decreasing early voting days and restricting the absentee ballot process.

The Commission’s findings complement a report that CAP Action released last week on voting access. Our report analyzes county-level data in seventeen 2012 swing states and ranks each county in those states on voter access. It highlights how there are wide discrepancies in a voter’s access to the polls not just based on which state he or she lives in, but also which county within the state.

If you live in a swing state and want to see how your county stacks up, check out the full CAP Action report HERE.

Norman Goldman Progressive Radio event a great succes!


radioThere was standing room only at the Impact Hub in Downtown Seattle on January 18th, as emcee David (Goldy) Goldstein introduced Andrew Villeneuve of Northwest Progressive Institute, and Geov Parrish, someone with a long history with radio, and then the star attraction of the evening, Norman Goldman.  Over 225 people were there, and when Norman finished his talk, they spontaneously jumped up and gave him a standing ovation.

Mark Taylor-Canfield, an independent journalist who contributes to many liberal publications, did an excellent review of the evening and Norman’s talk, “Seattle Hosts Progressive Media Gathering – Is Radio Dead?”  .  Here is the link to read his story:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Seattle-Hosts-Progressive-by-Mark-Taylor-Canfie-Alternative_Conservative_Corporate_Corporations-140119-860.html

If you go to the Facebook Page for MoveOn Whidbey, you can read Norman’s responses to 15 questions submitted that evening: https://www.facebook.com/MoveOnWhidbey?ref=ts&fref=ts

For continuing information about what’s happening with the efforts to bring progressive radio back to the Seattle area, please go to the website for Progressive Radio Northwest, www.progressiveradionorthwest.org