Jennifer McClellan will win special election and become Virginia’s first Black congresswoman


check out the story by the writer below

Story by Chandelis Duster

Virginia state Sen. Jennifer McClellan will win the special election for Virginia’s 4th Congressional District and will become the first Black woman to represent the commonwealth in Congress, CNN projected Tuesday.

McClellan will defeat Republican Leon Benjamin, a pastor and Navy veteran, to succeed the late Democratic Rep. Donald McEachin, who died in November.

For the enitre article, go to CNN news

Source: CNN

ADVISORY: COASTAL FLOOD ADVISORY REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 10 AM PST THIS MORNING


What

Minor coastal flooding is expected.

Where

Portions of northwest and west central Washington.

When

From 4 AM to 10 AM PST Tuesday.

Impacts

Minor coastal flooding due to tidal overflow is expected around high tide. This may lead to flooding of parking lots, parks, and roads, with only isolated road closures expected.

Additional Details

Inundation of up to 0.5 feet above ground level is possible along shorelines and low-lying coastal areas.

Tips

If travel is required, allow extra time as some roads may be closed. Do not drive around barricades or through water of unknown depth. Take the necessary actions to protect flood-prone property. Inundation above ground level refers to the height above the Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) level.

Issued By

NWS Seattle

1948 – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that covenants prohibiting the sale of real estate to blacks and other minorities were legally unenforceable ~ African Americans & Shelley v. Kraemer


Shelley v. Kraemer was a landmark Supreme Court case which stated that courts could not enforce racial covenants on real estate properties.
In 1945, an African-American family (the Shelley family) purchased a home in St. Louis, Missouri. During the time of purchase, the Shelley family was unaware that a restrictive covenant had been placed on the property since 1911. This covenant barred African Americans and Mongolians from owning the property. Louis Kraemer, an individual who lived ten blocks from the purchased piece of real estate, sued the Shelley family for purchasing the property.
The Supreme Court of Missouri stated that the covenant was enforceable against the Shelly family because the covenant was a private agreement between the original owners and was enforceable on any party who purchased the land in the future.
Shelley v. Kraemer Trial:
When the Shelley v. Kraemer trial was appealed, the court considered two primary questions: are racially-based restrictive covenants legal in regards to the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and can they be enforced by the court of law?
The United States Supreme Court in Shelley v. Kraemer ruled that racially-based restrictive covenants are invalid under the Fourteenth Amendment. The court stated that private parties may voluntarily abide by the terms of the covenant, but they may not seek enforcement of such a covenant, because the courts would constitute state action. Since a state action would by nature be discriminatory, the enforcement of a racially-based covenant in a state court would violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Case Profile of Shelley v. Kraemer:
The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘Shelley v. Kraemer’:
Date of the Trial: Shelley v. Kraemer was argued on January 15, 1948
Legal Classification: Administrative Law; this legal field associated with events and circumstances in which the Federal Government of the United States engages its citizens, including the administration of government programs, the creation of agencies, and the establishment of a legal, regulatory federal standard
United States Reports Case Number: 334 U.S.
**Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: Shelley v. Kraemer was decided on May 3, 1948 **
Legal Venue of Shelley v. Kraemer: The United States Supreme Court
Judicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Fred Vinson
Involved Parties: The following are the parties named with regard to their involvement in the Shelley v. Kraemer case:
Plaintiff: Shelley Family, Defendant: The state of Missouri and property owner Louis Kraemer
Verdict Delivered: The United States Supreme Court in Shelley v. Kraemer ruled in favor of the plaintiff b stating that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state from enforcing restricting covenants on the basis of race or color.
Associated Legislation with regard to Shelley v. Kraemer: The following statutory regulations were employed with regard to the Shelley v. Kraemer trial:
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Feb 20 – Wind Advisory


From Mon, Feb 20, 6:00 PM PST To Tue, Feb 21, 6:00 AM PST

What

Southwest winds 20 to 35 mph with gusts up to 55 mph expected.

Where

Southwest Interior, Tacoma Area, Hood Canal Area, Lower Chehalis Valley Area, East Puget Sound Lowlands, Bellevue and Vicinity, Seattle and Vicinity and Bremerton and Vicinity.

When

From 6 PM this evening to 6 AM PST Tuesday.

Impacts

Gusty winds could blow around unsecured objects. Tree limbs could be blown down and a few power outages may result.

Tips

Use extra caution when driving, especially if operating a high profile vehicle. Secure outdoor objects.

Issued By

NWS Seattle

1970 – Chicago Seven sentenced


February 19

READ MORE: 7 Reasons Why the Chicago 8 Trial Mattered

The Chicago Seven (formerly the Chicago Eight—one defendant, Bobby Seale, was being tried separately) are acquitted of riot conspiracy charges, but found guilty of inciting riot.

The eight antiwar activists were charged with the responsibility for the violent demonstrations at the August 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. The defendants included David Dellinger of the National Mobilization Committee (NMC); Rennie Davis and Thomas Hayden of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS); Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, founders of the Youth International Party (“Yippies”); Bobby Seale of the Black Panthers; and two lesser known activists, Lee Weiner and John Froines.

The defendants were charged with conspiracy to cross state lines with intent to incite a riot. Attorneys William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass represented all but Seale. The trial, presided over by Judge Julius Hoffman, turned into a circus as the defendants and their attorneys used the court as a platform to attack Nixon, the Vietnam War, racism and oppression. Their tactics were so disruptive that at one point, Judge Hoffman ordered Seale gagged and strapped to his chair; eventually Seale was tried separately.

Citation Information

Article Title

Chicago Seven sentenced

AuthorHistory.com Editors

Website Name

HISTORY

URL

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/chicago-seven-sentenced

Access Date

February 19, 2023

Publisher

A&E Television Networks

Last Updated

February 16, 2022

Original Published Date

November 16, 2009

FACT CHECK: We strive for accuracy and fairness. But if you see something that doesn’t look right, click here to contact us! HISTORY reviews and updates its content regularly to ensure it is complete and accurate.

© 2023 A&E Television Networks, LLC. All Rights Reserved.