1967 TUCSON RACE RIOT – a repost
July 23rd to 25th
BY CONTRIBUTED BY: MARITZA FERNANDEZ

Arizona’s counties Image courtesy WaterproofPaper.com
Few people are aware of the race riot that occurred in Tucson, Arizona in 1967. The riot was caused by the arrest of an unidentified black 14-year-old a few days before.
On July 23rd to 25th in the North side of the city within a four-mile area between 4th Avenue and Seneca Street, 200 young black people gathered to protest against the Tucson police force.
Rocks were thrown at police cars and buildings with the worst damage to a Crown Liquors store by approximately 60 rioters. Nothing was stolen, but 25 Tucson patrol officers, members of the Arizona National Guard, and firefighters were called to the scene. There was, according to the Los Angeles Times, “minor violence” on the 25th of July and at least one fire bomb was thrown at a paint store, but no other major violence or injuries were reported.
Two injured people were reported injured on July 24: Kurt Jackson, a white man who had driven through the area, and an unidentified woman were both struck by unidentified objects, likely rocks, and suffered minor injuries. Two arrests were made: James Brooks and Eugene Jones, two 19-year-old black men were charged with malicious mischief and unlawful assembly. Brooks pled guilty and was sentenced to 150 days in jail. Eugene Jones pled innocent, and was tried and acquitted in September, 1967. Two other juveniles, 13 and 16, were detained by police for throwing rocks at police cars and storefronts.
For the complete article: blackpast.org
Conclusion ~ Grok
Is the Republican Party the most fiscally sound

Based on available evidence, the Republican Party cannot be considered the most fiscally sound. While it advocates for lower taxes and reduced government size, its policies—particularly tax cuts like the 2017 TCJA and the 2025 “megabill”—have significantly increased the national debt and deficits, often more than Democratic policies. Democratic administrations have historically reduced deficits relative to GDP and achieved surpluses in some cases, though they also contribute to debt through spending. External factors like wars and recessions complicate the picture, but the Republican Party’s recent track record, especially under Trump, shows a departure from fiscal conservatism, prioritizing tax cuts and selective spending over balanced budgets. Factions within the GOP push for fiscal discipline, but they have struggled to shape party policy.
Thus, the claim of Republican fiscal soundness is not supported by recent
Source: Grok X
Trump says he never ‘wrote a picture.’ These images may show otherwise
Source: MSNBC
Separation of Church and State …
United States
Main article: Separation of church and state in the United States
John Locke, English political philosopher argued for individual conscience, free from state control
The concept of separating church and state is often credited to the writings of English John Locke.[1] philosopher According to his principle of the social contract, Locke argued that the government lacked authority in the realm of individual conscience, as this was something rational people could not cede to the government for it or others to control. For Locke, this created a natural right in the liberty of conscience, which he argued must therefore remain protected from any government authority. These views on religious tolerance and the importance of individual conscience, along with his social contract, became particularly influential in the American colonies and the drafting of the United States Constitution.[21] Thomas Jefferson stated: “Bacon, Locke and Newton..I consider them as the three greatest men that have ever lived, without any exception, and as having laid the foundation of those superstructures which have been raised in the physical and moral sciences”[22][23] Indeed such was Locke’s influence,
The concept was implicit in the flight of Roger Williams from religious oppression in Massachusetts to found what became Rhode Island on the principle of state neutrality in matters of faith.[24][25]
Reflecting a concept often credited in its original form to the English political philosopher John Locke,[1] the phrase separation of church and state is generally traced to the letter written by Thomas Jefferson in 1802 to the Danbury Baptists, in which he referred to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as creating a “wall of separation” between church and state.[2]United States Supreme Court first in 1878, and then in a series of cases starting in 1947. This led to increased popular and political discussion of the concept. The phrase was quoted by the
The concept has since been adopted in a number of countries, to varying degrees, depending on the applicable legal structures and prevalent views toward the proper role of religion in society. A similar principle of laïcité has been applied in France and Turkey, while some socially secularized countries such as Norway have maintained constitutional recognition of an official state religion. The concept parallels various other international social and political ideas, including secularism, disestablishment, religious liberty, and religious pluralism.
source: internet

You must be logged in to post a comment.