Deductions Eliminated Under Trump’s Tax Reform Proposal


Deductions Eliminated Under Trump's Tax Reform Proposal

Article Highlights:

  • Deductions The Proposal Retains
  • Itemized Deductions The Proposal Eliminates
  • Other Deductions The Proposal Eliminates
This is the second in a series of articles related to President Trump’s tax reform outline. Click here to read the first summary of the Trump Tax Reform.

One of President Trump’s key tax reforms is to eliminate all individual tax deductions except for those that incentivize home ownership, charitable contributions and retirement contributions. Although the administration’s one-page outline of the proposed tax reforms provides little detail, if all of the deductions except those noted are eliminated, the reform will impact both itemized deductions and income adjustments. This article will explore the deductions that the president’s proposal retains and those that it would eliminate, so you will be able to see how these changes could play out for your particular circumstances.

Deductions the Proposal Retains ~

Incentives for Home Ownership – Although Trump’s proposal provides no details about what “incentives for home ownership” means, this category would presumably include deductions for home-mortgage interest and property taxes. However, it is unknown if the plan will include the existing restrictions that limit the home-mortgage interest deduction to $1 million of home-acquisition debt and $100,000 of equity debt. It is also unclear if the incentives for home ownership would include second homes.

Charitable Contributions – Presumably, the plan would continue to be subject the 50%, 30% and 20% adjusted gross income (AGI) limits. The proposal does not address one of the most complicated areas (and one that is significantly abused) –contributions of overly valued property.

Retirement Contributions – Retirement contributions are deducted as an adjustment to income; this is frequently referred to as an above-the-line-deduction. Presumably, in the new plan, this still would include traditional IRAs and self-employed retirement plan contributions.

** Itemized Deductions the Proposal Eliminates **

Medical Itemized Deductions – Currently, medical deductions are already limited to those that exceed 10% of a taxpayer’s AGI. The Trump plan eliminates the medical deduction altogether, which would significantly impact senior citizens, especially those requiring significant elder care, and taxpayers who have incurred extraordinary medical expenses. What is curious about the elimination of the medical deduction is that, just a couple of months ago, as part of the failed ACA repeal, the administration wanted to reduce the medical AGI limitation and allow larger medical deductions. Now, it wants to eliminate them altogether.

Deduction for State And Local Taxes – Currently, deductions are allowed for state income tax, city and other income taxes, real and personal property taxes and (under certain circumstances) sales taxes.

Eliminating this deduction would have the most significant impact on taxpayers living in states that have income taxes. Taxpayers residing in those states would no longer be able to deduct their state and local income taxes and thus would be double-taxed on the same income. All but seven states have income tax, with California, New York and New Jersey imposing the highest rates. Support for this change is questionable, even among Republican senators, as representatives from states with income taxes will certainly want to retain the state income-tax deduction for their constituents.

Investment Interest Deduction – Currently, a deduction is allowed for investment interest in the amount of net investment income (investment income minus investment expenses). This means that the interest taxpayers pay on money that they borrow to purchase investments would no longer be deductible.

Casualty & Theft Losses – Every year, Americans deal with casualty losses from accidents, fires, floods, tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters. Currently, those taxpayers can deduct casualty losses – generally to the extent that they exceed $100 per event and 10% of their AGI. Under Trump’s plan, this deduction would be eliminated, which penalizes taxpayers who are in the greatest need – those who are recovering from a disaster.

Employee Business Expenses – Currently, employee business expenses, including the home-office deduction for employees who work out of their own homes, are deductible as miscellaneous itemized deductions, but these deductions are limited to those expenses that exceed 2% of AGI. Under the Trump plan, this deduction would be eliminated. This could pose a serious handicap for telecommuting employees, who would then have the bear the cost of their own offices, office equipment and supplies. Another example are mechanics who must pay for their own (expensive) tools.

Legal Fees – Currently, legal fees are deductible when they are incurred for the protection or production of taxable income. This includes taxable awards as a result of winning or settling a lawsuit. Typically, legal fees are contingent upon the taxpayer winning the suit; they often represent a large percentage of the award. Without this deduction, the taxpayer would have to pay taxes on the entire award even though a significant portion went toward attorneys’ fees.

Gambling Losses – Currently, gambling losses are only deductible in an amount equal to gambling winnings. Under Trump’s plan, these losses would no longer be deductible, meaning that taxpayers would have to pay taxes on all their winnings – even if they have net losses. Senior citizens and others who gamble recreationally could be hit with significant taxes even when they actually lose money.

** Other Deductions the Proposal Eliminates **

The following deductions are not itemized deductions but are considered adjustments to income. This includes retirement-plan deductions (such as those for IRAs and self-employed retirement plans, including SEPs, SIMPLE and other qualified plans); all of these deductions would be retained. However, if all other deductions are eliminated, the eliminated deductions would include:

Teacher’s Expenses – This is the educator’s deduction for classroom supplies (up to $250 per year). The 2015 PATH Act recently made this deduction permanent.

Health Savings Account (HSA) Deduction – Individuals with high-deductible health insurance can currently deduct contributions to HSA plans when the funds are used to pay qualified medical expenses. It is doubtful that this deduction will actually be eliminated, as HSAs are a key element of the administration’s plan to replace Obamacare.

Moving Expenses – Individuals who move over 50 miles as a result of a change in work location and who work at the new location for a minimum period of time can deduct the cost of the move.

Self-Employed Health-Insurance Deduction – Self-employed individuals, including partners and those who hold more than 2% of an S corporation’s shares, can deduct the cost of their own medical insurance as well as that of their spouse and dependents, subject to certain conditions.

Penalty for Early Withdrawal of Savings – When taxpayers withdraw from term savings accounts, they may incur interest penalties, which are deductible. This deduction was implemented to avoid having taxpayers pay taxes on interest income that they did not receive.

Alimony Paid – When a taxpayer pays alimony to a former spouse, that alimony is taxable for the recipient. To avoid taxing both parties on the same income, the one who makes the payments is allowed to deduct the alimony paid. Eliminating this deduction would have a significant impact on taxpayers who pay alimony.

Student-Loan Interest Deduction – This rules allows for a deduction of up to $2,500 for interest paid on student loans.

Domestic-Production Activities Deduction – Tax law includes a special tax deduction that encourages domestic production (as opposed to foreign production). C-corporations take this deduction on their corporate tax returns; self-employed individuals, partners and S-corporation shareholders must take this deduction on their 1040. It is doubtful that Congress would continue to allow this deduction for corporations while also discriminating against self-employed taxpayers by not allowing them to take the deduction.

We can only wonder if the president expects all of these deductions to be eliminated; perhaps he only proposed the eliminations as a tool to start negotiations with Congress. Details are not promised to arrive until June, so we will have to wait and see how this plays out.

article from nmcpa.com blog

Republican tax plan …


Organizing for Action

Friend —

A few minutes ago, Congressional leaders finally showed the American people their tax bill — the one they were supposed to show us yesterday, and have been talking about behind closed doors for months.

So why the delay?

They’ve been afraid to show us what’s inside … and now, we know why.

We already knew this plan would cut taxes for rich people and corporations, and that’s still true. But to pay for these unnecessary cuts, the money has to come from somewhere — and Congress and the White House want it to come from hardworking middle-class families.

We can’t let that happen. It’s on all of us to call our representatives, right now, and demand a better tax plan.

Here’s how this plan could affect you:

    1. If you’re one of the millions of Americans who count on Medicaid, Medicare, and other middle-class programs … this plan sets the stage for draconian cuts down the road, by adding $1.5 trillion to our deficit over the next decade.
    2. If you claim certain deductions on your federal taxes because you are paying off student loans, or because you’ve incurred medical expenses,alimony, or because you pay your fair share in state income taxes … this plan will take away your right to claim them
    3. If you’re looking to buy a house … a new cap would be placed on how much mortgage interest you’d be able to deduct
    4. If you get a tax credit because you’re retired on disability, or because you have adopted children … those vanish under this bill.

These moves aren’t “closing loopholes,” as Congressional leaders have claimed.

They’re hurting millions of Americans, all so they can give tax breaks to huge corporations that don’t need them. And, allow families worth more than $5 million to not pay a dollar of taxes on their estates.

This is what a bad process leads to: an equally bad bill. We shouldn’t be surprised — but it’s up to us to make sure this doesn’t go a step further.

Call your representative now to demand a better tax plan:

Thanks,

Saumya

Saumya Narechania
National Issues Campaign Manager
Organizing for Action

Fighting for Justice and Fairness for Working Families – Dina and Sherry


A Better Balance
Fighting for Justice and Fairness for Working Families
Twitter Facebook Instagram YouTube
Dear Friends,
When Katie, a cashier in Pennsylvania, suffered a miscarriage and experienced heavy bleeding, she tried to use doctors’ notes and hospitalization records to excuse her missed shifts, but her manager wouldn’t accept them. Instead, Katie was disciplined and forced to return to work, still in pain, and fearful of losing her job.
Stories like Katie’s are all too common, but A Better Balance is fighting for people like her every day.
During these difficult times, our efforts to use the power of the law to protect and defend the rights of workers, women, and LGBTQ families is essential.
With a federal government that has pulled back from its critical role enforcing our nation’s civil rights laws, we have doubled down to provide free legal support to vulnerable workers through direct representation and litigation to bring about wider change.
And in the absence of federal progress, we are working even harder to secure new protections for workers at the state and local levels.
Donate Now
Despite these challenges, with your support, A Better Balance has led the way and helped achieve major victories in 2017:
  • With this year’s victory in Rhode Island, we have helped to pass 40 paid sick time laws, including eight statewide laws, around the country.
  • Nashville, Tennessee implemented a path-breaking paid family leave policy—a model for municipalities across the nation.
  • And four new states (Vermont, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington) passed laws to ensure that pregnant workers are afforded accommodations to stay healthy and on the job.
  • We are implementing the strongest paid family leave law in the nation to ensure that millions of New Yorkers are able to access paid family leave when this groundbreaking law goes into effect. 
  • In New York City, we helped lead the fight for equal pay and strong laws protecting retail and fast food workers from abusive scheduling practices.  And most recently, we championed the expansion of the city’s paid sick time law to cover victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, or trafficking.
  • We assisted more than 450 workers and their families through our free legal helpline in 2017 and launched a national legal effort to combat Walmart’s punitive “absence control” policy featured in The New York Times. We also filed a nationwide class action discrimination lawsuit on behalf of thousands of pregnant Walmart workers.
None of these victories would be possible without your support.
With your support, we will not only preserve the progress we’ve made, but can move forward. We know the opposition will be trying every tactic in the book in 2018—support us now as we stand ready to fight back!
Best regards,
Dina & Sherry

BossFeed Briefing from Working Washington


We are Working Washington

BossFeed Briefing for December 11, 2017. Last Sunday, demonstrators held a satirical Buddhist-themed protest against proposals by the Taiwanese government to erode labor protections. Last Thursday, the Seattle Times published an extensive report on sexual harassment allegations against anti-worker State Representative Matt Manweller (R – Ellensburg), who said he would remain in office, but in the future might decline to hold meetings with women. Today is Day 7 of Working Washington’s 12 Days of Giving online auction, which now includes lunch with Lt. Governor Cyrus Habib. Yesterday was International Human Rights Day, and Friday is the 226th anniversary of the US Bill of Rights becoming law.


The bill 

Ty Messiah with Bill of Rights

Three things to know this week:

scroll Nannies and house cleaners launched the Seattle Domestic Workers Alliance on Thursday, sharing their stories and calling for change. With the support of key city councilmembers and a representative of the mayor’s office, domestic workers unveiled a proposal for a bill of rights to improve working conditions, raise standards in the industry, and build power for workers.

knife The US Department of Labor is considering a new rule which would allow employers to pocket tips for themselves. Court decisions and administrative rules around tip pooling can get complicated, but the current proposal could very well be the worst possible approach for workers.

giraffe A bankruptcy court judge has approved a plan by Toys R Us to pay top executives $16 million in bonuses if some goals are met, in addition to $8 million in retention bonuses previously awarded to the same top executives, despite the company having lost more than $300 million in just six months. Front line workers are not in line for any bonuses, regardless of company performance, level of service, hours of work, or anything else.

Two things to ask:

web And what if workers worked together? Based on their numbers and appetites, it appears that the spiders of the world could eat every human on earth in just a year, if they would just work together. There are believed to be an average of more than 100 spiders per square yard of the planet.

scales Will he notch another win? A federal judge has ruled that the lawsuit by Attorney General Bob Ferguson against Geo Group, the private prison company, may proceed. Ferguson has charged that Geo Group’s for-profit immigrant detention facility in Tacoma violates state law by paying prisoners less than minimum wage for their work.

 

And one thing that’s worth a closer look:

star More and more of our lives as workers & consumers are affected by crowdsourced ratings which are then aggregated online, but as anyone working in the gig economy can tell you, there’s often little correspondence between how many stars you get and anything that happened in the real world. Even knowing all that though, Oobah Butler’s story in Vice is still startling: he submitted his London shed as a restaurant to TripAdvisor, posted some curious pictures, and said the place was by appointment only. With disturbing speed and no verification by any actual customers, the restaurant ascended the ranks and became officially listed as the top-ranked joint in London — even though it didn’t even exist & had never served a meal. By the end of the experiment, hundreds of people had called in desperate to make reservations at this apparently uber-exclusive venue; companies had sent free promos in hopes of a marketing boost; and a nearby municipality even offered tax incentives if the “restaurant” would move there.

politics,pollution,petitions,pop culture & purses