![]() |
I just got word that the so-called “Americans for Prosperity” swift boat group is up on the air with new ads attacking Democrats that stood up for health insurance reform.
We can’t let these attacks go unanswered. We’ve got rapid response TV ads ready to go, but we must raise $121,772 more before our August FEC deadline at midnight Tuesday to get them on the air. Can you chip in?
Thanks.
Jon Vogel
![]() |
For the second time in a week, the ultra-conservative Boston Herald ran a giant, front-page headline attempting to tie me to recent ethics investigations in Washington. (Not surprisingly, the actual story, deep inside the paper and in much smaller type, asserted no impropriety.)
I take attacks from the far-right as a badge of honor. The meaner the attacks and the larger the headlines, the more evidence that they know — and fear — that I am effective, and that I have earned the support you have given me.
But now the attacks are accelerating and it is time to fight back.
Three weeks ago, President Obama signed into law the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the most sweeping financial reform since the Great Depression. I am proud to have played a leading role in passing that legislation despite the opposition of some of the most powerful financial institutions in the country, a legion of well-paid lobbyists, and almost every Republican in Congress.
The Right is determined that I pay a price.
As November approaches, I predict we will see even more malicious headlines. Then, the next wave of attack will arrive — nasty television ads fueled by big money from right-wing organizations. And now, because of the recent Supreme Court decision defining corporate spending on elections as free speech, the threat is far greater.
Let us not underestimate the power of lies. Inherent implausibility is not self-refuting. We must fight back — now.
I will need substantial resources to fight effectively and we cannot afford to wait until the fall. So I am asking you to help me raise over $100,000 by Monday, August 23rd. Your strongest support will make that possible.
The tabloids and other right-wing institutions are counting on us to cower in fear. Let’s stand up to the GOP attack machine — fighting every false, malicious attack by raising our voices and pooling our resources. Their assaults will only make us stronger.
Let’s send them a message today.
Thank you for your help,

P.S. You can multiply your efforts by forwarding this email to others who share our values and determination. The larger our numbers, the more powerful we become. 
ECONOMY — ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF THE BUSH TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH COSTS $36 BILLION, BENEFITS 2 PERCENT OF AMERICANS: This week, the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) released an analysis of what would happen to the tax code if the conservative proposal to extend all of the Bush tax cuts were to be adopted. The tax cuts are currently scheduled to expire at the end of the year, and the Obama administration has proposed renewing only those for the lower- and middle-class. “You will find Republicans resisting very strongly any bill that allows taxes to be raised on any segment of Americans today,” said Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), while Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) has said the House GOP will throw “everything we’ve got” into preserving the tax cuts for the wealthy. And too many Democrats — like Sens. Evan Bayh (D-IN) and Kent Conrad (D-ND) — have been cowed into expressing a willingness to extend the tax cuts temporarily for a year or two. According to the JCT analysis, extending the cuts for the wealthy — which affects only two percent of the population — for just one year will cost $36 billion. Obama’s plan, meanwhile, focuses the tax increase on the very top of the income scale. The 608,000 taxpayers who make between $500,000 and $1 million “would pay $6.5 billion more, or an average of almost $10,000″ and the 315,000 taxpayers who earn more than $1 million would “owe $31 billion more, or almost $100,000 on average.” Even under Obama’s plan, the very rich will be paying less in taxes than they did in 2001, since they would be paying a lower marginal rate on their first $250,000 in income. As the Wonk Room’s Pat Garofalo writes, “It’s worth remembering that income inequality is currently the worst it has been since the 1920s. The richest one percent of households now receive nearly 25 percent of the country’s income, after earning less than 10 percent in the 1970s.”
|
You must be logged in to post a comment.