Tag Archives: Sheila Jackson Lee

~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

Islamaphobia: The Lyin’King

1 Comment

Yesterday, Rep. Peter King (R-NY), the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, held a four-and-a-half hour hearing titled, “The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community and that Community’s Response,” which targeted the entire Muslim American community for supposedly aiding and abetting domestic radicalization. Many in the civil rights community urged King to not focus exclusively on American Muslims, noting that doing so would not only serve to shore up animosity against America’s law-abiding Islamic community and empower extremists, but that it would also ignore the deep threat to America from non-Muslim terrorists. But King ignored these criticisms and continued with his hearing anyway, using it as a platform to claim that Muslims are failing to cooperate with law enforcement and homeland security officials. Yet Democrats on the committee, as well as several of the witnesses testifying, turned the tables on King, debunking his smears and demonstrating the fact that the Muslim American community is an ally in the fight against terrorism, not an enemy.

THE BACKGROUND: King, who became the chairman of the House Homeland Security committee in January, announced the hearings months ago. Since then, a broad coalition of civil rights advocates, national security experts, and other Americans who want an America that is both secure, free and tolerant have come together to condemn the hearings and the singling out of the Muslim American community. As time went along, panelists chosen by King began to drop like flies, as Americans realized the extremism that these figures represented. Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who asserted that “we are at war with Islam,” was the first to go. Next, Walid Phares was dropped from the witness list following an investigation of his past as a member of a violent Lebanese Christian militia that was implicated in atrocities. And of course, King himself was a vocal supporter in the past of the Irish Republican Army, which engaged in terrorism that led to the deaths of countless people, including one American. Throughout the process of putting together his panel, King claimed that his goal was to single out the Muslim American community because “it makes no sense to talk about other types of extremism, when the main threat to the United States today is talking about al Qaida.” Yet a January 2011 terrorism statistics report from the Muslim Public Affairs Council compiled using publicly available data from the FBI and other crime agencies — finds that terrorism by Muslim Americans has only accounted for a minority of terror plots since 9/11. Since the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, Muslims have been involved in 45 domestic terror plots. Meanwhile, non-Muslims have been involved in 80 terrorist plots. King’s hearing failed to look at some of the root causes of Muslim radicalization, like the exploitation of Muslim grievances about U.S. foreign policy by extremists, the social marginalization of extremists, and ways to prevent radicalization — which involve close cooperation and introspection within and between Muslim American communities and law enforcement. By excluding such issues, King’s hearing exposed itself as nothing more than a witch hunt before it had even begun.

KING’S FALSE CLAIMS: King’s own words at the hearing were full of misstatements and outright lies. In his opening statement to the committee, King claimed that the reason he decided to single out Muslim Americans is because the threat from them was particularly unique. He explained, “Indeed, by the Justice Department’s own record, not one terror-related case in the last two years involved neo-Nazis, environmental extremists, or anti-war groups.” King’s statement would be surprising to residents of Fall River, MA. This past December, white racist and neo-Nazi sympathizer Justin Vieira “broke a natural gas line and threatened to blow up a three-decker” house and was arrested shortly after by police. Additionally, there have been at least four other neo-Nazi or neo-Nazi sympathizer terror plots since September 2009. Throughout the hearing, King’s Democratic colleagues — including Reps. Bennie Thompson (MS), Sheila Jackson Lee (TX), and Laura Richardson (CA) — brought up the fact that the congressman said in 2007 that there are “too many mosques in this country,” prompting him to say that he “never said” such a thing, a clear lie as ThinkProgress documents in a video fact check.

TOLERANCE FIGHTS BACK: Throughout the hearings, King’s Democratic colleagues and the witnesses called before the committee spoke eloquently on behalf of the American Muslim community and its contributions to battling radicalism. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), the first Muslim ever elected to Congress, made headlines when he gave his emotional testimony in which he recounted the story of Muhammad Hamdani, a Muslim first responder who gave his life saving people trapped in the Twin Towers on 9/11. “Muhammad Salman Hamdani was a fellow American who gave his life for other Americans. His life should not be defined as a member of an ethnic group or a member of a religion, but as an American who gave everything for his fellow citizens,” said Ellison. Hamdani’s mother, Talat Hamdani, told Politico last week that she along with two other family members of 9/11 victims had been promised a meeting with King — where she planned to urge him to cancel the hearings — but that he failed to show up at the meeting. In addition to pointing out that King himself has expressed extreme anti-Islamic sentiments before, many of King’s Democratic colleagues expressed solidarity with American Muslims. Jackson Lee said the effort was nothing more than “an effort to demonize” Muslims. Rep. Richardson said the hearings were “discriminatory” and “questioned why other House committees weren’t holding hearings on threats to American children involving other religions, a veiled but some say clear reference to the sex abuse scandal in the Catholic Church.” One of King’s own handpicked witnesses, Abdirizak Bihi, who was an uncle of a radicalized Muslim son, essentially debunked the chairman’s assertion that Muslim Americans are not cooperating with law enforcement, recounting one story of how the Somali Muslim community stepped forward to report its own radicalization, saying, “We the Somali community should get the credit!”

~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

RADICAL RIGHT: The Voter Fraud Fraud


Employing baseless fear mongering about the (no longer existent) ACORN and other liberal groups that are supposedly trying to steal next week’s elections, conservative “anti-voter-fraud campaigns are popping up across the country, but their biggest rollouts have tended to be in lower-income areas with large minority populations.” From the Illinois Republican Party and Tea Party groups to the right-wing astro-turfing group American Majority Action, a startling number of right-wing groups have rolled out aggressive campaigns to “block Democrats…err, voter fraud, at the polls,” as Mother Jones’ Suzy Khimm sarcastically noted. While campaigns and political parties have long dispatched trained poll watchers and election judges to the polls to look for irregularities, this year, conservative groups are turning to grassroots activists with little or no training in thinly-veiled efforts to suppress liberal voter participation. Right-wing blogger Michelle Malkin announced on Fox News that “we are all voter-fraud police now,” while American Majority Action lets anyone with an iPhone become a poll watcher with their Voter Fraud app. While combating fraud is of course important, these supposedly well-meaning efforts have a “chilling effect” on voter participation, notes Gerry Hebert, executive director of the non-partisan Campaign Legal Center. Conservative groups tend to target their efforts at communities with large minority or Democratic populations, claiming that fraud is more prevalent in these neighborhoods, with the effect of suppressing Democratic voters and disenfranchising minorities. Other times, groundless allegations of voter fraud are simply used to rile up the base before Election Day and undermine the credibility of opponents, but have the dangerous effect of also undermining voters’ faith in the electoral process.

SUPPRESSION: This year’s election has been riven with conservative voter suppression efforts. This spring, the progressive group One Wisconsin Now uncovered collusion between the Wisconsin Republican Party and state’s Republican attorney general to engage in “voter caging,” a tactic in which groups attempt to disenfranchise voters by sending mail to addressees on the voter rolls — often targeting minority communities — and then compile lists of addressees from which the mail is returned undelivered, using that information to purge voter rolls. In Houston, the non-partisan Texans for Public Justice has filed a formal complaint with the Texas Ethics Commission against the right-wing group King Street Patriots for engaging in voter suppression efforts. The Patriots have been targeting voters in Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee‘s (D-TX) district, who said in a statement, “I was very concerned when I was informed of multiple incidents in which voters in predominately minority neighborhoods of my congressional district were intimidated and harassed. These incidents were documented by both the electronic and print media.” In Indiana, a “shoving match” broke out Saturday at a polling station after a GOP official was caught — illegally — photographing voters “in an intimidating manner.” The conservative Heritage foundation also puts out a “candidate book” every year which encourages Republican candidates to push for more suppressive voting rules, such as requiring voters to have photo IDs at the polls. Voter fraud hysteria is “happening to a degree we haven’t seen in years,” said Wendy Weiser, a voting rights expert at the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law. “They can be highly confrontational. That can cross the line into intimidation and voter suppression.” Some conservative groups even acknowledge that their tactics may flout election laws, “but they suggest that such a violation is worth the risk if there’s the potential of rooting out acts of electoral skulduggery.” Right-wing organizers ResistNet candidly admit that their activities could be illegal, but slyly suggest how activists might be able to skirt the rules: “It is illegal to video the polling place, but you can video the birds on top of the polling place or the dog sitting in front of it. If your video of birds or dogs happens to include voter vans, well… ”

THE WRONG ANGLE: No where in the country have voter fraud allegations played a more significant role in the election than in the heated Nevada Senate race, where Republican challenger Sharron Angle has — without evidence — accused Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) of trying to “steal this election.” In a fundraising plea to supporters, Angle’s attorney Cleta Mitchell wrote, “As Sharron Angle’s campaign attorney, I am sorry to report that the Democrats and their cronies are up to their same old tricks of trying to manipulate the election in hopes of skewing the results in their favor.” The only evidence Mitchell offered is that the Angle campaign had “received reports that some teachers union representatives were offering Starbucks cards to people to get them to vote for Harry Reid.” “Coffee and doughnuts was the entirety of the substance of the Angle allegations,” the Las Vegas Sun reports, but Mitchell confidently concluded that “what Harry Reid is doing is clearly illegal.” Meanwhile, an outside group called the Nevada Action Coalition has charged Reid with unsubstantiated accusations of election impropriety, telling supporters “the dark side has secret plans for this election.” They’ve alleged that voting machines have been sabotaged to change people’s votes to Reid, and have been holding seminars to train “lots of watchers” while encouraging voters to call their “Poll Watcher Hot Line.” But as the Sun reported, while the group bills itself as an independent “group of ordinary American citizens,” a non-profit group run by Angle donated almost $100,000 to the Nevada Action Coalition in 2008. Moreover, far beyond unsubstantiated voter fraud allegations, the Coalition claims that the federal government wants to merge the U.S. with “the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada” and designate a section of Kansas City as sovereign Mexican territory, according to its website. Election officials have squarely dismissed these fraud allegations, saying they had “not received any credible complaints of any fraud taking place.” Larry Lomax, the election official in Clark County, Nevada’s largest, said it is “technically impossible to pre-program” voting machines. “We have not had a single complaint filed,” said Secretary of State Ross Miller, who oversees elections and set up a robust Election Integrity Task Force in 2008. “[U]unfortunate and frankly,” Miller said the allegations are “irresponsible, because they undermine the public’s faith in the electoral process.” Unsurprisingly, Fox News host Glenn Beck jumped to Angle’s defense, confidently asserting — without any evidence — that Miller was merely doing the bidding of right-wing bogeyman billionaire George Soros and the Service Employees International Union. Surveying the baseless voter fraud allegations, veteran Nevada political journalist John Ralston wrote, “I am exhausted at the ignorance and repulsed by the vitriol.”

NONEXISTENT FRAUD: Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the right-wing voter fraud hysteria is how rare voter fraud actually is. In 2002, the Bush administration made cracking down on voter fraud a top priority and after five years of investigations across the entire country, they brought only 86 convictions — hardly enough to sway even a single election, let alone a existential threat to American democracy. Moreover, most of the cases were “misunderstandings about voter eligibility, such as felons who voted without knowing it was illegal.” The administration found “virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections.” A 2007 study by the Brennan Center reached a similar conclusion, reporting that “the vast majority of ‘fraud’ cases, it found, were due to typographical errors.” Slate’s Chris Beam has also detailed how exceedingly difficult it would be to actually commit voter fraud on any scale that would actually sway elections, considering that every person involved risks five years in jail and and a $10,000 fine. Meanwhile, in the 2008 Supreme Court Case Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, which upheld Indiana’s law requiring voters to provide photographic identification, only a single case of fraud was deemed worthy of citation. Of course, the right has a long long history of fomenting conspiracy theories about voter fraud in efforts to actually suppress participation.