Tag Archives: Terrorism

Culture:The Political Meaning Behind Summer Blockbusters


This summer’s blockbuster movies may be escapism, but they’re powerful expressions of major trends in American politics. Movies as diverse as Sam Raimi’s foreclosure horror flick DragMetoHell and Adam McKay’s financial melt down cop comedy The Other Guys have explored the rage and helplessness of an economy that may be altered forever. James Cameron’s science-fiction epic Avatar sparked as many, if not more, environmental debates than Al Gore‘s An Inconvenient Truth. And, Hollywood director Michael Bay sought out the Defense Department’s cooperation when he started making his Transformers movies, the third of which arrives in theaters on June 29, and switches American troops from fighting Afghans and Iraqis to fighting giant robots, symbolically referencing the human cost of our ongoing wars. Rather than trying to escape politics in our entertainment, it’s time to embrace them. In the next few months, a trio of superhero movies is poised to exploit post-bin Laden American triumphalism. In the midst of our sluggish economic recovery, a new crop of comedies are poised to help audiences adjust their economic expectations. And the most controversial education reform movie since Waiting for Superman stars Cameron Diaz. We may think we’re seeking mindless entertainment when we buy tickets to an action movie or a romantic comedy, but those films are both the product of our politics and an expression of them. Welcome to The Progress Report’s progressive guide to summer movie season.

OLD ENEMIES AND NEW ONES: In future summers, we’ll see an explosion of action movies based on Osama bin Laden‘s death. Kathryn Bigelow, director of the Oscar-winning movie The Hurt Locker, was already working on a movie about an attempt on Bin Laden’s life when President Obama announced that the terrorist had been killed. Universal green litan adaptation of Marcus Luttrell’s memoir about his service as a Navy SEAL in Afghanistan. And Disney’s moved to trade mark the term “Seal Team 6,” locking up the name of the squad that got Bin Laden, now a valuable bit of intellectual property. But this year, superhero movies are turning back to old enemies, and to conflicts where the exercise of American power was decidedly less complicated than it is now. Captain America: The First Avenger, due out on July 22, is an origin story, but it’s also very much a period piece, a high-gloss flashback to World War II. Captain America will fight terrorists in that movie, but terrorists who are acting as agents of the Nazistate under the command of the Red Skull, a super villain who, according to some origin stories, was recruited by Hitler himself. Unlike Tony Stark, who has to destroy a terrorist cell who kidnapped him while avoiding civilian casualties so he can keep the allegiance of Afghan citizens, Captain America won’t be required to show much restraint. Similarly, X-Men: FirstClass goes back to the ’60s to bring its titular mutant heroes together for the first time. The X-Men aren’t agents of the government — in fact, they’re precisely the opposite, a group of people whose extraordinary abilities make them despised rather than prized, and whose struggle to figure out if they should assimilate into society or withdraw in it is a major metaphor for gay rights. But in this origin story, the characters have a chance to earn their spurs as heroes and a place in mainstream America by acting as a fail-safe for President Kennedy when his brinksmanship on the Cuban Missile Crisis goes awry. By contrast, Michael Bay’s Transformer: Dark of the Moon, is dipping into more contemporary politics. The movie is relying on American distaste for Julian Assange and Wikileaks — as well on the rather contradictory pleasure of watching our major cities get destroyed on-screen — to power a script in which giant robots try to bring down the United States government by revealing state secrets.

ON ECONOMY, LAUGH OR CRY: While our foreign policy plays out on a super heroic scale this summer, a new spate of comedies suggests that we’d better buck up about the economy, because we’re stuck with its hardships. The people who get hit by hard times in these movies range up and down the economic spectrum. In a subplot of the ensemble wedding comedy Jumping the Broom, economic issues create strain for a couple rushing to the altar. In Bridesmaids, comedian Kristin Wiig’s Annie is a failed entrepreneur, working in a jewelry store after her bakery became a victim of the downturn, taking with it her boyfriend and business partner. And at the lower end of the scale, Tom Hanks is a big-box store veteran who loses not just his chance for a promotion but his job because he doesn’t have a college degree in LarryCrowne, which opens on July 1. All of these movies mine the indignities of economic disasters for laughs, sometimes uncomfortable ones. The pretensions of the wealthy family in Jumping the Broom often make them look ridiculous. Losing her life savings propels Annie into sharing a house with two deeply strange roommates and into a job at a jewelry store where she subtly undermines her love bird customers. And the pursuit of his degree places Larry in a community college that makes Community’sGreendale look almost legitimate by comparison. That humor aims to make the recession bearable. But these movies also take a hopeful tack, recasting hardship as an opportunity to revitalize your soured relationship with your husband, win back your shattered personal and professional confidence, or build the life you always wanted on a foundation of a used motorbike, clothes out of the back of a truck, and a romance with a burned-out speech professor. It’s the comedy of resignation, using humor to acclimate us to changes in our economic expectations that on some days seem worrisomely permanent. The exception is Seth Gordon’s Horrible Bosses, due out on July 8, which suggests that if you’re stuck in a job where your employer forces you to drink so he can cast you as an alcoholic, makes you discriminate against your coworkers, or you’re being sexually harassed by Jennifer Aniston, offing your supervisor may be your only option, but though the solution’s less uplifting, the desperation is the same. Desperate times call for desperate measures.

THE BIG ISSUES: And while studios normally save their big, pointed issue movies for the winter Oscar-bait season, sometimes a few sneak into the summer lineup — however unintentionally. Bad Teacher, in theaters on June 24, may be the first dark sex comedy built around standardized testing. Cameron Diaz, a burned-out teacher, seizes on the idea that breast implants are her ticket to marriage to Justin Timberlake, a wealthy man who has chosen to teach rather than go into his family’s business. Her plan to get the money? Winning a bonus awarded to the teacher whose students do best on a state achievement test. Whether Bad Teacher ends up being ammunition against testing, an argument against merit pay, or just another step forward for the burgeoning women’s raunch-comedy movement remains an open question. And coming out on the same day, and in loose sync with President Obama’s renewed call for immigration reform, is Chris Weitz‘s ABetterLife, which follows a man trying to build a landscaping business in Los Angeles while avoiding the constant risk of deportation. Weitz’s last project was vampire phenomenon Twilight: New Moon, and he’s never been involved in an explicitly political project before. But his grandmother is a Mexican immigrant, and if Weitz can sell an immigration reform drama to the Twilight fan base, it could be the summer’s best piece of pop activism.

Buy nukes or feed the hungry?


Change.org
Tell the Senate: Reduce spending for the nuclear weapons complex.

Sign the Petition

$55 billion.

That’s how much the U.S. spends each year maintaining its nuclear arsenal. That’s also what it would cost to provide 350 million people worldwide with clean drinking water. Or help 30 million children survive past their 5th birthday.

But instead of relieving the suffering of millions around the world, the U.S. continues to spend billions on nuclear weapons and systems. Even though the Cold War era is over, leaders in Washington keep asking for more funding for new nuclear weapons every year, and taxpayers foot the bill every time.

We need to reassess our priorities.

There is a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) that calls for the U.S. and Russia to agree upon reductions in the size of their respective nuclear arsenals. But before that happens, START must be ratified by 67 votes in the U.S. Senate.

Tell your Senators to phase out our nuclear arsenal and pass START now >

The issue isn’t just the exorbitant expense of nuclear weapons – it’s their inherent instability. With the U.S. and Russia maintaining thousands of nuclear weapons on hair-trigger alert and nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan, the elimination of nuclear weapons is more urgent than ever.

With the continued development of a nuclear arsenal, the U.S. is helping make sure nuclear weapons continue to threaten the people of the world with catastrophic possibilities. Building and maintaining nuclear weapons means there are production sites all over the world that are vulnerable to terrorist attack or to theft of weapons or weapons-grade materials.

Getting New START through the Senate is not going to be easy. Some senators still want to continue to invest billions of dollars in new nuclear weapons production facilities in exchange for a “Yes” vote on ratification.

Tell your Senators to ratify the new START agreement without preconditions or billions in new funding for the nuclear weapons complex >

If we don’t speak out and take action for a world free of nuclear weapons, who will?

Thank you for taking action,

The Change.org Team