Could You Survive?


Brave New FilmsFACT: In January 2014, 13 states raised their minimum wage; since then these states added more jobs and have lower unemployment rates than the 36 states that did not raise the minimum wage.

FACT: The U.S. Government could save $7 billion dollars if companies just paid employees a higher minimum wage.*

FACT: Federal minimum wage is $7.25 – and some states actually have a lower state wage of $6.25 an hour.

How can anyone, alone or with a family, survive on minimum wage?

FACT: They can’t.

But together we are fighting to change this. In two weeks, states like Arkansas, Alaska, South Dakota, Nebraska and cities like Eureka and Oakland are casting their votes to raise the wage. And Brave New Films is continuing to expose the Koch brothers’ fight against increasing the minimum wage.

SL_MinimumWageThumb.jpeg

Join the fight today by sharing these videos in solidarity with all who agree that working people should not live in poverty.

Share this because you believe that hard working families deserve to thrive, not barely survive.
Thank you for your action.
Robert Greenwald, President
Brave New Films

P.S. Check out our new OverCriminalized video on Upworthy! Let them know you like them posting our work!

* “Raising the Federal Minimum Wage to $10.10 Would Save Safety Net Programs Billions and Help Ensure Businesses Are Doing Their Fair Share” by David Cooper. Economic Policy Institute. 10.16.2014.

Cory’s Colorado


By

Colorado’s Women Deserve Better Than What Cory Gardner Has To Offer

A new report released today by CAP Action shows the ways U.S. Senate candidate and Colorado Congressman Cory Gardner’s actions have consequences for Colorado women, despite what he would have you believe. Ever since he decided to run for Senate, Gardner has been attempting to remake the conservative image he has cultivated during his time in the House. But his record stands as a testament to his true convictions and showcases the types of harmful policies he would execute if elected to the Senate — and a new CAP Action poll released by Public Policy Polling shows that women aren’t buying his change of heart.

Squashing economic equality: Gardner has voted against the Paycheck Fairness Act even though women lead nearly three times as many households as men in Colorado, yet earn just 80 cents for every dollar a man earns. He opposes (and has voted against) a minimum wage increase even though 61% of Colorado women support raising the minimum wage.

Repealing the Affordable Care Act: Rep. Gardner has voted dozens of times to repeal the ACA, meaning he opposes more than 145,000 Colorado women having access to affordable health care. Health insurance offers financial protection even if serious health issues arise, making this an economic concern for women and families.

Rolling back reproductive rights: As a Senate candidate, Rep. Gardner has tried to muddy the waters on his position on women’s reproductive rights, releasing an ad in which he states his support for over-the-counter contraception and saying he “can’t support personhood going forward.” 60 percent of women say they “don’t trust Gardner when he says he no longer supports a personhood amendment,” perhaps because he remains a co-sponsor of federal personhood legislation, the Life at Conception Act, which would ban abortions completely and could outlaw some methods of birth control.

Overall, women in Colorado support Sen. Mark Udall over Rep. Gardner 51 percent to 40 percent.

BOTTOM LINE: Colorado women don’t trust Gardner, and they don’t support his policies that would hurt women and families. He has opposed expansion of health rights and protections gained by women at every turn and refuses to acknowledge the economic realities that they face. He may try to convince the people of Colorado that he’s changed, but actions speak louder than campaign promises.

Florida: Vote for Charlie Crist


I really want you to see our newest ad:

Watch our new ad

Government should be of the people, by the people, and for the people.

But under Rick Scott, it’s been government of the special interests, by the big corporations, and for the powerful.

Time for a change.

a message from Sherrod Brow ~~ Petition: Protect Social Security


sherrodbrown.com


Social Security was intended to provide certainty to seniors. People call it a safety net because that’s part of what it does — Social Security’s guaranteed benefits act as an income floor below which we, as a nation, have chosen not to let anyone fall.

Well, the Republicans don’t necessarily see it that way. They’ll hedge their bets and say that they only want to cut Social Security later — not for today’s seniors, just for the younger generations who are currently paying into Social Security.

A broken promise is a broken promise no matter how you spin it. Republicans’ plans to cut, privatize, or otherwise mess with Social Security for seniors and disabled workers are fundamentally wrong — if you agree, please sign our petition.

The only real threat to Social Security is Republicans’ election-year political games. They’ve been after Social Security for a long, long time.

Show your support for Social Security. Sign the petition.

Thank you,

Sherrod