1776 Formal signing of the US Declaration of Independence by 56 people (date most accepted by modern historians)


The Declaration of Independence, Authentic Full Size Replica Printed on Antiqued Genuine Parchment. 23 x 29

Fate of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence

The following is often published and cited concerning the fate of the Signers, but its accuracy is doubtful, and should only be taken as “traditional” rather than historical. See the end for links to other sources on the subject.

Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.

They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. What kind of men were they?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton.

At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife’s bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks later he died from exhaustion and a broken heart.

Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates. Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more. Standing tall, straight, and unwavering, they pledged: “For the support of this declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”

They gave you and me a free and independent America. The history books never told you a lot about what happened in the Revolutionary War. We didn’t fight just the British.

We were British subjects at that time and we fought our own government!

Some of us take these liberties so much for granted, but we shouldn’t. So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of July holiday and silently thank these patriots. It’s not much to ask for the price they paid. Remember: freedom is never free!

I hope you will show your support by please sending this to as many people as you can. It’s time we get the word out that patriotism is NOT a sin, and the Fourth of July has more to it than beer, picnics, and baseball games.

constitution.org

On July 31, 2026 ~ House Passes Cuts to the Farm Bill


On July 31, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the 2026 Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 (H.R. 7567), a sweeping five‑year farm bill covering FY2026 through FY2031. While the bill included some provisions Democrats supported — such as allowing SNAP recipients to buy hot prepared foods and upgrading EBT cybersecurity — it locked in historic cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Key Cuts and Impact

  • The bill does not reverse the $187 billion in SNAP funding cuts already enacted in April 2026 via the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1) snapbenefitcalculator.com.
  • The new SNAP baseline is $101.2 billion$6.2 billion below FY2026 levels, meaning the cuts are made permanent under federal law
  • This reduction threatens the ability of SNAP to meet the needs of 42 million Americans — about 1 in 8 — including working families, children, older adults, veterans, and people with disabilities
  • Since H.R. 1 passed, three million Americans have already lost food assistance and will not be restored under the farm bill .
  • Stricter eligibility rules and expanded work requirements in H.R. 1 could push 2.4 million more people out of SNAP each month between now and 2034 

Political Context

  • The cuts were part of a broader GOP strategy to reduce federal spending and limit federal aid, with some provisions framed as reducing fraud and waste snapbenefitcalculator.com.
  • Democrats, including top appropriators like Rep. Rosa DeLauro, criticized the move, warning it would disproportionately harm vulnerable populations and give the administration more leeway to fund agencies like Border Patrol without reforms 
  • The bill passed 224–200, with bipartisan support for some provisions but strong opposition from Democrats over the SNAP cuts

In short: On July 31, 2026, the House passed a farm bill that made permanent $187 billion in SNAP cuts, locking in a $6.2 billion funding gap and expanding eligibility restrictions, which critics say will harm millions of low‑income Americans.

Source: snapbenefitscalculator.com, Politico

July 2026 — House Passes Cuts and Major Defense Funding Measures.


In July 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives took several significant steps on spending and defense policy, with some measures advancing cuts or reductions while others pushed massive increases.

  1. Funding extension passed to avoid shutdown
    On July 21, the House approved a short-term funding extension (continuing resolution) to head off a partial government shutdown in the fall. The 220–205 vote extended current funding through Dec. 4, giving about two extra months to finalize full appropriations. The bill was mostly party-line, with only one Republican joining Democrats in opposition. Senate Republicans objected to missing some “anomalies” in spending, and the measure is expected to be rewritten before final passage
  2. NDAA defense bill passed with pay raise for service members
    On July 21–22, the House passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal 2027, a $1.15 trillion defense bill, by 216–212. It includes a 5–7% pay raise for all service members but no civilian raise, drawing Democratic criticism for leaving DoD civilian pay unchanged  The bill also allocates roughly $40 billion to the Department of Energy for nuclear oversight and over $10 billion for other military-related programs. Democrats opposed it largely over the ongoing Iran war and the bill’s $28% budget increase 
  3. Budget framework for $95B package
    On July 22, House Republicans adopted a budget framework for a $95 billion party-line spending package, aiming to skirt the Senate filibuster. The framework funds the military, intelligence, farm aid, and $10 billion for election security grants to incentivize voter-ID laws. It lacks new spending offsets, prompting fiscal hawks to demand them before final passage. Civilian workforce cuts rejected
    The House also rejected an amendment to examine reducing the Pentagon’s civilian workforce by 200,000 employees, citing concerns about understaffing and operational impacts 
  4. Key takeaway
    While the July 2026 House actions did not broadly cut federal spending, they did advance a major defense funding bill, a stopgap funding extension, and a budget framework for a large spending package — all with partisan divisions and unresolved debates over offsets, pay parity, and political priorities

Sources: Federal News Network, Politico, Roll Call,

The House of Representatives Passes Bill with Major Cuts to Food Assistance and Rural Programs ~ For Fiscal Year 2027


In June of 2026, the House passed a Republican-led fiscal year 2027 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies funding bill that includes significant cuts to food assistance and rural aid programs 

Key Cuts and Changes

  • $200 million reduction in USDA fruit and vegetable vouchers for women, infants, and children (WIC), threatening access to healthy food for 5 million eligible recipients 
  • Hundreds of millions in rural aid cuts, including slashing water and waste grants for poor communities and cutting the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) loans in half
  • Reduction in Food for Peace funding, which supports U.S. farmers and global food aid
  • Discretionary funding of $26.3 billion — $1.1 billion (4%) less than FY2026 — with steep increases in costs for farmers and rural communities 
  • Rural broadband investments and development grants for rural businesses are also targeted 

Impact on Vulnerable Populations
Critics, including Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee Ranking Member Sanford Bishop Jr., warn the cuts will decimate rural assistance grants, harm farmers by reducing access to USDA resources, and endanger food security for working families and children.

They also note that USDA offices are already understaffed, making it harder for farmers to access benefits 

Political Context
The bill was advanced by Republicans and passed along party lines, with no Democratic support. Supporters frame it as necessary to control costs amid rising food prices and rural infrastructure challenges, while opponents call it a devastating blow to nutrition programs and rural economies 

If the Senate also passes a similar version, the bill would become law, potentially reshaping federal support for food assistance and rural development for years to come. 

Sources: House Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Appropriations

politics,pollution,petitions,pop culture & purses