1812 – “Old Ironsides” (the USS Constitution) won a battle against the British frigate Guerriere east of Nova Scotia.

1848 – The discovery of gold in California was reported by the New York Herald.

1856 – Gail Borden received a patent for his process of condensing milk by vacuum.

1919 – Afghanistan gained independence from Britain.

1929 – “Amos and Andy,” the radio comedy program, made its debut on NBC starring Freeman Gosden and Charles Correll.

1934 – Adolf Hitler was approved for sole executive power in Germany as Fuehrer.

1940 – The new Civil Aeronautics Administration awarded honorary license #1 to Orville Wright.

1942 – About 6,000 Canadian and British soldiers launched a raid against the Germans at Dieppe, France. They suffered about 50 percent casualties.

1960 – Francis Gary Powers, an American U-2 pilot, was convicted of espionage in Moscow.

1960 – Two dogs were launched in a satellite into Earth’s orbit by the Soviet Union.

1962 – Homero Blancas shot a 55 at the Premier Invitational Golf Tournament held in Longview, TX. It was the lowest score in U.S. competitive golf history.

1974 – During an anti-American protest in Nicosia, Cyprus, U.S. Ambassador Rodger P. Davies was fatally wounded by a bullet while in the American embassy.

1981 – Two Libyan SU-22s were shot down by two U.S. Navy F-14 fighters in the Gulf of Sidra.

1991 – Soviet hard-liners announced that President Mikhail Gorbachev had been removed from power. Gorbachev returned to power two days later.

1998 – The first piece of the 351 foot bronze statue of Christopher Columbus arrived in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

1999 – In Belgrade, thousands of Serbs attended a rally to demand the resignation of Yugoslavia’s President Slobodan Milosevic.

2004 – Google Inc. stock began selling on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The initial price was set at $85 and ended the day at $100.34 with more than 22 million shares traded.

~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

2018

08/19/2025 Nativegrl77

As a young man, I marched to end Jim Crow segregation.

Spilled my blood on that bridge in Selma.

Spent months in jail.

All for my basic rights.

Our beloved John Lewis and Representative in Congress watched trump roll back the rights he shed blood for.

— Friends …

I’ve had enough of Republicans making it harder for Black people to vote.

Enough vilifying of Black athletes for peaceful protests.

Enough killing of unarmed Black Americans in our streets.

I’m asking for your urgent help. We desperately need to elect a Democratic Majority to stop this trump’s bigoted agenda.

I can’t do it alone — I know better than anyone it takes a movement of people taking a stand. That’s why I’m asking you to join the fight!

I was beaten by angry mobs, just because I was Black and wanted my basic rights.

I’m devastated to watch as my brothers and sisters face the same injustice I faced all those years ago — it’s heartbreaking to see us slide backward.

But hear me when I say this: We need to stand together against the rising tide of hatred and injustice — that’s directly promoted by trump

That’s why I’m asking you to join my fight to elect a Democratic Majority to put a check on this dangerous Administration.

So, I need you to take decisive action with me and donate $5 to elect a Democratic Majority. Every dollar we raise now will help us secure victory in November.

Thank you,

Congressman John Lewis

~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

Is it illegal to lock a member of Congress in the Chambers?

08/19/2025 Nativegrl77

~ Grok, answers

Locking a member of Congress in the chambers would likely be considered illegal under several U.S. laws, depending on the context and intent. While there’s no specific statute explicitly addressing “locking a member of Congress in the chambers,” such an act could fall under broader laws related to kidnapping, false imprisonment, or interfering with official duties. Here’s a breakdown of potential legal implications:

False Imprisonment: This is the unlawful restraint of a person’s freedom of movement without their consent. Locking someone in a room against their will could meet this definition under state or federal law. For example, in the District of Columbia (where Congress is located), false imprisonment is a crime under common law and could lead to civil or criminal penalties.
Kidnapping or Unlawful Detention: If the act involves force or intent to harm, it could escalate to kidnapping, a federal offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1201. Kidnapping carries severe penalties, including up to seven years in prison or more if aggravating factors are present.
Interference with Official Duties: Members of Congress are federal officials, and obstructing their ability to perform their duties could violate 18 U.S.C. § 351, which protects members of Congress from assault, kidnapping, or threats. Interfering with their legislative responsibilities might also be construed as a violation of federal law protecting government functions.
Capitol Security Laws: The U.S. Capitol is a highly secure federal building governed by specific regulations. Actions disrupting the safety or movement of members within the Capitol could violate laws enforced by the U.S. Capitol Police, such as those under 2 U.S.C. § 1961, which governs Capitol security.
Civil Rights Violations: If the act targets a member based on protected characteristics (e.g., race, gender, or political affiliation), it could trigger additional federal civil rights violations under laws like 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or 18 U.S.C. § 241.

Intent, context, and jurisdiction matter significantly. For example, a prank might be treated less severely than an act with malicious intent, but both could still be illegal. Penalties could range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity and applicable laws.If you’re referring to a specific incident or hypothetical scenario, please provide more details, and I can tailor the response further. Additionally, I can search for any recent legal cases or news related to Capitol security if needed.

Disclaimer: Grok is not a lawyer; please consult one. Don’t share information that can identify you.

Explain false imprisonment

Capitol security measures

Source: Grok

~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

8/18 1920 – Tennessee ratified the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Amendment guaranteed the right of all American women to vote.

08/18/2025 Nativegrl77

~ my 2cents ...

What year is it?

08/18/2025 Nativegrl77 2 Comments

a repost … a rant

The conservative stance or comments about women, Planned Parenthood, contraceptives, and abortion have been beyond offensive yet enlightening for voters who believe it’s time to give women choices like men have had without interference. Hopefully, fact-checking the claims about what Planned Parenthood does for both men and women while considering vasectomies, Viagra, and other enhancements including equipment used by men while they’re at it.

The fact is, some women do not want children, very young women are not ready, and working women need time, sadly there are victims of violence who are capable of making their own (personal decisions) plan their families around their individual situations. We all deserve (free will) to choose whatever reproductive procedure is appropriate for our lives, no matter what conservatives believe.

It is the 21st Century, why can’t these conservatives understand that birth control, contraceptives, and or possible abortions are a part of a woman’s overall health care is beyond my understanding. Yet, pro-lifers don’t seem to let facts get in the way because they feel women who have sex and get pregnant should either have the baby or give it up for adoption. First, the conservative movement that pushes a family values platform on women is political, big government in full effect and should stay out unless requested and or they are a family member or doctor. Second, women should not be the only ones responsible for the prevention of unwanted pregnancies; men need to step up. Third, Conservatives use a broad brush on the topic of women and their health care, specifically when the topic includes reproductive services, STOP. Last, the new law or change implemented by former President Obama’s Admin offered an option for safe and affordable access to healthcare services. The idea that folks are against women who pay for all or part of their #ACA should not have reproductive coverage is absurd. It’s time to question, and demand answers from those in religious organizations who get federal funding, investigated. Isn’t it fair that they are required to fall in line or lose the funding likewise pharmacists who say their religion keeps them from POS =point of sales, of contraception products seem to contradict the business … excuse me…some are also getting federal funds to do and or stay in business.

I don’t know about you, but the reasoning and or rationalization Conservative Politicians, constituents, or members of Congress used to bash and attack organizations like Planned Parenthood by reciting so-called facts from the internet with a list of falsehoods is embarrassing. The list of questionable information includes silly things like PPH misuses money, funnels money or that PPH only does abortions is just the beginning. I can only say the #ConservativeConspiracy theorists are in full effect in this year of 2024. The facts are there; find out by calling Planned Parenthood! They do so much more than just abortions, but that pro-life aka MAGA stance on abortion seems to be the Conservative focus filled with misleading information assuming hoping their constituents won’t research their comments.

Thankfully, women who are uninsured, underinsured, or who just cannot afford a mainstream doctor can go to Planned Parenthood, which is the first step. If needed, they get referred to get mammograms at an affiliated clinic with a Planned Parenthood Doctor. Voters can always assume Republicans will never let the truth get in the way of nasty rhetoric about PPH and women who choose.

Unfortunately, that thing about the Democratic Party wanting to abort black babies is not even a thing, let alone ludicrous. The Democratic Party has stated that it protects a woman’s right to choose and will apply all the Federal laws that exist …period. We cannot be surprised at all the misinformation thrown at viewers by TV hosts and Pundits. I get it, you don’t like abortion, but I suggest that Republican Leaders would be better off calling out the source or thorn in the side of your Pro-life stance advocates. It must be tough not to want to use a footnote or source as an absolute from the internet but come up short. If you listen to conservative TV and talk radio, you realize most just throw out the facts when it comes to birth control, contraceptives, abortion, and what they all mean to a woman’s health care in general.

Women’s health care has always been a politically charged football. Women of childbearing years or, if indeed pregnant were and are still in some states, considered or labeled as being a pre-existing condition; an offensive rationalization used by so many in the insurance industry to deny or limit safe and affordable health care. Because of former President Obama, that practice by the insurance industry was no longer acceptable, however, we still need to regulate how insurance industries treat women, our ability to reproduce makes Conservatives rise up to engage in hypocrisy on so many levels. I get the disagreement about abortion, but most Planned Parenthood clinics offer men and women quality accessible, safe, and affordable health care no matter what form it comes in. Yet, an ideology, a family values platform pushed, debated, and voted into law by red-state Republicans has managed to be implemented in some states that are now trying to dismantle Women’s rights quietly, others have been blocked by the courts without allowing proper challenges IMO. HOW?

Today, in this 21st Century life, women still have to demand the right to make personal health care choices without political intervention.

Unfortunately, some states have succeeded in shoving the reproductive services issue in a political box with laws that are so archaic you have to wonder what year it is.

The cliché of, “do as we say, NOT as we do” keeps coming to my mind every time I hear Conservatives or any extremist on the right speak on issues of Women’s Reproductive Rights. Again, Men’s health care issues unlike women have been treated differently and provided with procedures and enhancement drugs among other things without questions. Yet, Women, mostly Women of colour are being singled out as Abortion Scarlet, Abortion Abusers, portrayed as something mysterious, possibly evil, and definitely disrespected by some extreme folks from the right who do not seem to understand that birth control, rape, unwanted pregnancy’s, incest, contraceptives, and abortion are all a part of a women’s and little girl’s health care no matter what race or economic background.

Freedom Fighters … believe #TheRightToChooseMatters

Get ready for the DNC to shake up Chicago as a Change Maker … #VoteForKamalaWalz2024