Tag Archives: Prescription drug

~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

What Medicare means … Maria Cantwell

12/22/2011 Nativegrl77

When I see Republicans using every trick in the book in an attempt to end Medicare as we know it, I wonder if they really understand what Medicare means to seniors.

It’s more than just a way to pay for routine care like checkups and screenings. It’s a guarantee of economic security — a promise that, if you put in a lifetime of hard work, the floor won’t fall out from underneath your retirement because of a health problem.

Every day, I hear from Washington seniors who rely on this promise — and from people still in the workforce who wonder if it will be there for them when they retire. That’s why I’m committed to strengthening Medicare. I fought to pass reform that will send $250 rebates to 62,000 Washington seniors — a down payment on closing the prescription drug “donut hole.”

That’s the path forward on Medicare: bringing down costs, improving quality, and maintaining that promise of retirement security.

But some see a different path, one in which Medicare would be turned into a voucher program. This would be great for insurance companies — but it would require seniors to pay more. And with so many living on a fixed income, this could leave them with nowhere to turn. A program like that wouldn’t be fair to seniors who rely on Medicare for their economic security. It wouldn’t be Medicare at all.

Medicare is critical to the retirement security of millions. It is a promise we made nearly half a century ago, one of the best things we’ve done as a country. And protecting it is one of the jobs I’m most proud to do.

I’ll be in touch soon with an update on our fight to protect Medicare. But, for now, thank you for being part of this team.

Maria

~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

You can help stop abuse of science …Kevin Knobloch, Union of Concerned Scientists

05/23/2011 Nativegrl77

Dr. Rosemary Johann-Liang spent seven years working for the government. Her job was to make sure that the prescription drugs we take and give to our families are safe and effective.

Become a member today and help UCS hold the Obama administration and its agencies accountable for protecting science by implementing reforms that will outlast their time in office.

But four years ago, she was reprimanded by her bosses for recommending that the popular diabetes drug Avandia carry a warning label because the drug had been linked to a significant increase in the risk of heart attacks. Her superiors not only failed to act on her recommendation, but they also took away her oversight role in the safety review of the drug. Avandia is made by the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline—which, according to a Senate investigation, intimidated physicians and sought ways to downplay findings that a rival drug might reduce cardiovascular risk.

Unfortunately, Dr. Johann-Liang is not alone. Thousands of scientists, across various federal agencies, have told us they fear retaliation for blowing the whistle on political interference in their work.

The Union of Concerned Scientists called attention to widespread attacks on science like this during the Bush administration. Now, the administration has changed, but the system that allows politics to undermine science largely has not.

Please help UCS lock in government reforms to protect scientists and ensure the best available science informs key decisions about our health, safety, and environment—become a member today.

www.ucsusa.org

Federal agencies are working right now to develop stringent new policies to protect scientists from political pressure by special interests. Working with government scientists and other policy experts, UCS has developed resources for agencies to draw upon and is working to ensure these policies:

Protect scientists who report political interference in agency work;

Prevent conflicts of interest on science advisory committees;

Allow scientists to share their research and scientific analysis with the public and the press; and

Increase transparency so the public knows what science agencies consider when making policy decisions.

We need your help to ensure federal agencies adopt strong policies that protect science—now and into the future.

Please become a member today. www.ucsusa.org

Sincerely,

Kevin Knobloch

President

P.S. When you join UCS, you join more than 79,000 UCS members who also believe that decisions about our health, safety, air, and water should fully consider the best available science. Please join us today and help us keep politics out of science.

~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

Meet candidate… John Boozman

10/03/2010 Nativegrl77

—–Values Legislation——

I firmly believe that traditional marriage, a union between a man and woman, is the backbone of our society. Studies have shown that marriage between a man and a woman makes for strong families, which in turn, makes for a strong nation. Unfortunately, many activist judges across America are trying to change the definition of marriage to fit their own agenda.

In an effort to end this, I have cosponsored and voted for the Federal Marriage Amendment, a bill that would define marriage in the Constitution and protect it from being radically redefined by judges who overstep their constitutional boundaries. This bill will hold judges accountable and prevent them from redefining marriage. It also allows for state voters and legislatures to determine if they wish to grant civil unions, without imposing on the rights of other states.

Just as strong families are a core value of our nation, so is respect for life. As a strong believer in the dignity of all human life, I will work to defend those who cannot defend themselves. In the 111th Congress, I introduced the Parental Notification and Intervention Act of 2009.
H.R. 2061 requires that parents be notified at least four days in advance of any abortion to be performed on their minor daughter and gives them power to stop an abortion from being performed. I also have supported measures before Congress that promote the sanctity of life, including:

Co-sponsoring and voting for an immediate ban on partial birth abortion;
Co-sponsoring and voting for legislation that charges a criminal with a separate crime if an act of violence against a pregnant woman results in the killing or injuring the woman’s unborn child;
Co-sponsoring and voting to expand tax credits and other support for adoption;
Co-sponsoring and voting for legislation to ban human cloning;
Co-sponsoring legislation against the morning after pill and RU-486.

As a member of the Values Action Team, a group of conservative lawmakers who work to create pro-family and pro-life legislation, I will continue to fight for family values, as well as other issues that reflect the ideals that we hold dear, such as protecting the Pledge of Allegiance and keeping the airwaves family-friendly.

I have to say after reading the boozman Healthcare and Medicare/Medicaid comments i am convinced that the candidate made an obvious choice for double speak and or not clearly stating where he stands…. i would say he is a repeal replace and eliminate all things associated with social service programs and privatization all of it…you read it and tell me.

Medicare

As an optometrist who practiced in the Third District of Arkansas for 25 years, I know firsthand how important Medicare is to Arkansas’ seniors and those who are disabled. While Medicare has helped millions of Americans live happier and healthier lives, the program has failed to keep up with the advancements the medical field has seen since its inception.

The Medicare program was in need of some modernization so that seniors and the disabled could benefit from new technologies and advancements made in the health care field. For this reason, I voted for the “Medicare Prescription Drug and Modernization Act of 2003”, which President Bush signed into law in December 2003. This new voluntary program guarantees real savings and choice to seniors looking for prescription drug coverage. Additional benefits for Arkansas’ low-income seniors are also included in the program.

In addition, I have consistently opposed annual cuts to Medicare reimbursements to doctors. Because physician reimbursements are so low under the Medicare program, many doctors around the country are no longer treating Medicare beneficiaries. The formula which calculates these reimbursements is desperately out-of-date. Until Congress can determine a formula which accurately reimburses physicians, it is vital that we prohibit further drops in reimbursements to our health care personnel, thus allowing our doctors to continue treating Medicare beneficiaries.

We also need to make sure that Medicare has the resources to deliver on its promise of a secure and healthy retirement for today’s and tomorrow’s seniors. I promise to work with my colleagues in the House, both Democrat and Republican, to strengthen Medicare so that the program can continue to provide innovative care and benefits to our nation’s seniors and disabled.

Health Care

During the twenty-six years that I practiced optometry in Rogers, I saw incredible changes in the health care field. Today’s medicines and treatments have given people a longer lease on life and for that we should be grateful.

However, these changes have come with a price. Recent trends in the health care industry show a staggering increase in cost, both to the provider and the recipient, that threaten our health care infrastructure. This is especially true in rural areas, where access to quality health care services are limited.

In recent years, we have taken steps in the House of Representatives to try to address this crisis. We passed legislation that would limit medical malpractice abuse; upgrade our rural healthcare infrastructure; allow small businesses to pool together and purchase affordable insurance plans for their employees; and to promote the use of tax-free health savings accounts. We have prohibited massive cuts to Medicare reimbursements for physicians and worked to implement a new Medicare prescription drug plan that is helping more seniors than ever before. Lastly, we have placed a large focus on promoting medical research, disease awareness, and preventative medicine.

Nevertheless, we still have more work to do. We must not lose sight of the fact that many of our poorest families have no health care coverage, seniors are still struggling to find doctors who will treat Medicare patients, and that a number of diseases, like diabetes and cancer, are still running rampant.

My background as both a small business owner and a health care provider gives me a good perspective from which to work with my colleagues in Congress to lower the costs of quality health care for all Americans. We are committed to making this a top priority in the 111th Congress and it is my hope that the Senate will join us in making these much needed reforms to our healthcare system.

Health Care Debate

Read the legislation:

H.R. 3962 – Affordable Health Care for America Act
H.R. 3961 – Medicare Physician Payment Reform Act of 2009

I believe all Americans need access to quality, affordable health care. However, I am concerned that we are being forced into a government takeover of our health care system, something I am very much opposed to. This ‘one-size-fits-all’ experiment by the White House won’t give hardworking Americans the peace of mind that we deserve when seeking medical treatment.

We need to preserve the doctor-patient relationship. This allows patients to make choices that suit their individual requirements not Washington bureaucrats. Politicians making decisions about our health care needs is a prescription for disaster. Instead of taking away health care choices, we need to be offering more opportunities to patients. We need patient-centered health care that allows them to get the treatments and the care they need, when they need it. The President’s prescription will deny patients treatments and make them wait to get the treatments they are allowed to receive.

We need a plan that reduces health care costs, expands access and increases the quality of care. Unfortunately, the 1,018 page proposal supported by the President does not achieve those goals. We need to work together to make patient care the top priority in our reform. Despite claims this reform will reduce health care costs, Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Director Elmendorf told Congress that the proposed reform will only INCREASE future federal spending on health care which will lead to a continued increase in the deficit.

I have been asked by constituents about my health care coverage. Some people say health care coverage offered to Members of Congress and all federal government employees is like the Obama plan. It’s not. The choices are all private insurance providers, creating competition, but there is NO government plan included. The vast majority of government employees are opposed to allowing any government option as part of their health care.

I don’t want the government to tell me what is acceptable and unacceptable about my health care options. I want my doctor to tell me what’s best for my care. I also think that if this government plan is enough for the American public, it’s good enough for Congress. That’s why I cosponsored House Resolution 615, calls on all members of Congress who vote for a public health care option to relinquish their entitlement to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) and enroll in the public plan.

I believe that health care reform needs to include tort reform, something H.R. 3200 and H.R. 3962 fail to address. Our physicians, faced with possible lawsuits issue tests on patients that may be unneeded just to make sure they are covering all their bases to rule out serious health care concerns on a routine visit. This is driving up the cost of health care.

My Voting Record