
Equal Pay Day – April 17 – AAUW


One day while I was minding my own business, I received an email from the fish and wildlife department. I had signed up to get them but not out of malice or some secret plan to track their actions, but I gotta say reading it gave me chills sadness and great disappointment… and that was my first reaction then it made me remember the elk kill that happened in December 2011; for a little background. I was reading local online news when I saw an article about an elk kill that was going to happen that following Monday. It went on to say that there was a golf course built in the area and after two years the course was suffering from damage so a request for containment was obviously put in and approved. This story just gets worse as the silly and ugly of it all becomes known and the obnoxious takes over; I read for more information.
The article says about 30 Elk were noted encroaching, creating a mess for the owners and that a schedule of Elk Kills were made …I am becoming more upset and decided it is time to call. The contact person was great, but he said that there were only about three Elk. The dept. had arranged with the Owners of the golf course, but between you and me, it did not sound kosher because the kill had not been announced, the community did not know and the tribes in that area seemed to be left out as well. I am not against sport fishing or hunting but this is not the definition of it… it seems more like legalized poaching, which is wrong on so many levels. My dad hunted and fished but in the good way. Anyway, I decided to put the original article and my reaction out into the airwaves to see what would happen. Apparently, the story was already getting a negative response with plenty of phone calls to the department. Thank goodness the community heard about it and demanded the kill be stopped. The area’s tribe stated they did not know about the kill and stated that some of the land where the kills would take place were on sacred land, which made me relax because unless or until a mutual agreement is made the Elk just might be safe. If they needed the meat, far be it from me to obstruct as long as the tribes and that area’s food banks are filled for the local communities. I cannot say that was on their minds though as one of the employee’s stated online, if they had just kept it quiet, the commotion would be less… there is more but I will spare you…
Now, in a different part of the Pacific NW, not only are they hiring to help with the elk kill they have a wait list of volunteers and “paid helpers” to “round” up the elk which is sickening. Why? Because not too long ago the number of Elk was reduced to almost zero and five years later WA state decides to thin out the Elk again. btw wtf is taking the most sought out meat home? Again, another …hmmm did they talk to that area’s tribes?
My inquiry is below
Hello:
I just had to respond to an email, which I guess I subscribed to on a regular basis. First, I want to state that I have nothing against hunting, but I really do not understand why these elk kills are put on if the elk are truly not harming anyone. If someone could explain to the public who decides the kills are needed and why and how many and what could be done other than an every 5yr plan or so. I have to ask because the available habitat seems to be shrinking. At one point, the number of elk was very low with humans building roads and or homes on wildlife land. I assure you that I am not the only Washingtonian that misunderstands, and some object to the kills. I am no expert but who is invading whom. I received an email looking for volunteers, who included the following: “The department’s management plan calls for reducing the herd size to bring the number of animals into balance with available habitat,” Jonker said. For me, as a Washington resident exposed to hunting and fishing all my life; this just seems like a legalized poach and bringing the number in balance with the available habitat is only as big as the space taken up by the next golf course or family center or housing development. I do not understand who gets the meat, hopefully it will go to ALL the Tribes in that area … who, should be the only “hunters” by the way or the areas food banks but the whole “Volunteers” are needed to facilitate access for elk hunts “sounds the opposite of what hunting is all about.
Their response:
Thank you for contacting the Department of Fish and Wildlife. I am forwarding your e-mail to our Wildlife Management Program, so they can address your concerns.
If you have, any questions please feel free to contact us at360-902-2464 or email us atlicensing@dfw.wa.gov.
Nicole
**************************************************
Like I said, I have nothing against hunting and fishing but what we have here is nothing close and poaching wildlife that already is dealing with humans that have decided to not just spread out but develop land at whatever cost to the Wildlife, just is opposite of Washington State should be about. They have been trying to bring back other predators and given how much development has been created… NOW, puts not only residents at risk but kids and animals on what feels like a monthly basis! There are Black and Brown bears, bob cats and such folks are told to beware of don’t do this that and the other … uh, live side by side? They want and want food…right? It’s up to the department to instruct and fine those who don’t exercise proper sanitation and or maybe don’t know how to clean their area, so wildlife stay in the habitat, which btw is surrounded by homes, schools and off-road trails… sigh 
Washingtonians also have issues with Whales beaching themselves, not only are they dying of unknown illnesses, but pods of tagged Females are also having trouble keeping their calves alive. It could even be how they are being handled and honestly the possibility of sonars being the only thing,” those in the know” seem to be pointing toward as more and more die is weird. I may not know anything about the Puget Sound’s Whales, but I do feel that our Navy should cease and desist with all the sonar or at least tell the public what the sonars are being used against. IMHO, Sonars are just the beginning or the problem, there are Cruise Ships, Trollers, Boaters and Whale Watching Boats that are not only getting too close, but testing has also found Fuel and Garbage harming and or killing the Marinelife.
Organized kills of Marinelife and Wildlife should concern us all. Why? Because there is no announcement no explanation and this leaves some of us wondering what new development is about to shrink the habitat even more and who knows what the consequences will be but given what we’ve seen it can’t be good.
Nativegrl77

Contact: Adam Fetcher (DOI) 202-208-6416
Theresa Eisenman (BOEM) 202-208-5387
Serena Baker (BLM) 307-212-0197
WASHINGTON, D.C. – As part of the Obama Administration’s commitment to developing the nation’s vast renewable energy resources, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar today announced that two major wind energy initiatives have completed important environmental reviews, clearing the way for public comment and final review.
Onshore, Salazar announced the release of final environmental impact statements for a proposed wind power complex in Wyoming that would generate up to 3,000 megawatts of power, making it the largest wind farm facility in the U.S. and one of the largest in the world.
Offshore, Salazar announced the publication of an environmental assessment for commercial wind leases and site assessment activities on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) offshore Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Today’s step puts Interior in position to offer this area as one of the nation’s first offshore competitive lease sales before the end of the year.
“When it comes to wind energy, we’re making significant progress both onshore and offshore to diversify our nation’s domestic energy portfolio and stand up a clean energy economy,” Salazar said. “Today, as we take the next steps toward realizing what could be the largest wind energy project in the world and holding a competitive offshore wind lease sale, we are really at the forefront of a renewable energy revolution.”
The proposed Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Farm would contain up to 1,000 turbines and generate enough power for up to 1 million American homes. The project would be built on public, private and state land in Carbon County, Wyoming. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is reviewing the proposed wind project, as well as a proposed amendment to the Rawlins Resource Management Plan to accommodate the facility. For more information on the proposed project, click here and for a map, click here.
“Wyoming has incredible wind resources and this proposed wind energy project has potential to generate jobs and bring a record amount of clean power to market throughout the West,” said Acting BLM Director Mike Pool. “We look forward to hearing from the public as we work to ensure that this proposal, if approved, would be built in the right way and in the right place to minimize environmental impacts.”
The proposed wind energy project is under consideration as part of Interior’s initiative to advance smart development of renewable energy on public lands. Since 2009, Interior has approved 31 utility-scale wind, solar, and geothermal projects that, if built by the companies, will provide approximately 7,200 megawatts of power to communities across the West, or enough to power nearly 2.5 million homes. These achievements build on the historic expansion of renewable energy under President Obama, with energy from sources like wind and solar doubling since the President took office.
The environmental assessment for the Rhode Island/Massachusetts Wind Energy Area will be used by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) to inform future leasing decisions as part of the Administration’s “Smart from the Start” offshore wind energy initiative. The Wind Energy Area (WEA) comprises approximately 164,750 acres within the area of mutual interest identified by the two states. BOEM leadership will host public information sessions on July 16 and 17 to further engage stakeholders and consider public comments on the environmental assessment in determining whether to issue a Finding of No Significant Impact, or conduct additional analysis under NEPA in order to hold a lease sale for commercial offshore wind development. For more information, click here.
“This environmental assessment is the first of its kind in the northeast and is based on thorough scientific and technical analysis and substantial stakeholder input to identify the most suitable location for commercial wind energy activities in this area offshore Rhode Island and Massachusetts,” said BOEM Director Tommy Beaudreau. “We will continue to seek public participation in our process, including comments on this environmental assessment as we move forward with an innovative, targeted leasing approach to offshore wind.”
In November 2010, Salazar launched the “Smart from the Start” wind energy initiative for the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf to facilitate the siting, leasing and construction of new projects. A critical piece of the strategy includes the identification of Wind Energy Areas, done in consultation with BOEM’s intergovernmental renewable energy task forces and other federal agencies, and the development of the environmental assessment to simplify the leasing process.
Salazar launched the competitive leasing process for the Rhode Island/Massachusetts Wind Energy Area with a Call for Information and Nominations in August 2011 that invited developers to identify locations within the area of mutual interest in which they seek commercial leases for wind projects.
Fight Dirty Energy for a Better, Cleaner Energy Future WASHINGTON STATE !!! Sincerely, |

At a time to be determined by the Majority Leader, in consultation with the Republican Leader, the Senate will proceed to Executive Session to consider the nomination of Executive Calendar #186 Derek Anthony West, of California, to be Associate Attorney General. There will be one hour for debate equally divided in the usual form. Following the use or yielding back of time, the Senate will proceed to vote on confirmation of the nomination.
At 5:00pm, the Senate will turn to Executive Session to consider Executive Calendar #90, the nomination of Gregory Alan Phillips, of Wyoming, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit. There will be up to 30 minutes for debate equally divided prior to a vote on confirmation of the nomination. If all time is used, the vote would begin at approximately 5:30pm today.
Before the recess we were able to lock in agreements to consider the Dorsey (Nevada District Judge) and West (Associate Attorney General) nominations. We could vote on confirmation of those nominations tomorrow.
Order to consider Dorsey nomination
At a time to be determined by the Majority Leader, in consultation with the Republican Leader, the Senate will proceed to Executive Session to consider the nomination of Executive Calendar #97 Jennifer A. Dorsey, of Nevada, to be United States District for the District of Nevada. There will be 1 hour for debate equally divided in the usual form. Following the use or yielding back of time, the Senate will proceed to vote on confirmation of the nomination.
Order to consider West nomination
At a time to be determined by the Majority Leader, in consultation with the Republican Leader, the Senate will proceed to Executive Session to consider the nomination of Executive Calendar #186 Derek Anthony West, of California, to be Associate Attorney General. There will be one hour for debate equally divided in the usual form. Following the use or yielding back of time, the Senate will proceed to vote on confirmation of the nomination.
LEGISLATIVE ITEMS
Passed S.793, a bill to support revitalization and reform of the Organization of American States, and for other purposes.
No additional EXECUTIVE ITEMS
*********************************************************************************************
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
*****************************************************************
The next meeting in the House is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on July 8, 2013.
| 2:00:08 P.M. | The House convened, starting a new legislative day. | |
| 2:00:23 P.M. | The Speaker designated the Honorable Steve Womack to act as Speaker pro tempore for today. | |
| 2:00:41 P.M. | Today’s prayer was offered by the House Chaplain, Rev. Patrick J. Conroy. | |
| 2:01:59 P.M. | The Speaker announced approval of the Journal. Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved. | |
| 2:02:02 P.M. | PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – The Chair designated Mr. Israel to lead the Members in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. | |
| 2:02:10 P.M. | ONE MINUTE SPEECHES – The House proceeded with one minute speeches. | |
| 2:13:10 P.M. | The House received a communication from Chandra Harris, District Director, Office of Representative David Scott. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Ms. Harris notified the House that she had been served with a subpoena issued by the Superior Court of Clayton County, Georgia for testimony in a civil case and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, she had determined that compliance with the subpoena was not consistent with the privileges and rights of the House. | |
| 2:14:38 P.M. | The Speaker announced that the House do now recess. The next meeting is scheduled for approximately 5:30 p.m. today. |
| 2:14:38 P.M. | The Speaker announced that the House do now recess. The next meeting is scheduled for approximately 5:30 p.m. today. | |
| 5:30:14 P.M. | The House convened, returning from a recess continuing the legislative day of July 8. | |
| 5:30:22 P.M. | The Speaker announced that votes on suspensions, if ordered, will be postponed until a time to be announced. | |
| 5:30:29 P.M. | H.R. 1341 | Mr. Fincher moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended. H.R. 1341 — “To require the Financial Stability Oversight Council to conduct a study of the likely effects of the differences between the United States and other jurisdictions in implementing the derivatives credit valuation adjustment capital requirement.” |
| 5:30:57 P.M. | H.R. 1341 | Considered under suspension of the rules. |
| 5:30:58 P.M. | H.R. 1341 | DEBATE – The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1341. |
| 5:40:22 P.M. | H.R. 1341 | At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed. |
| 5:40:33 P.M. | H.R. 1564 | Mr. Hurt moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended. H.R. 1564 — “To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to prohibit the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board from requiring public companies to use specific auditors or require the use of different auditors on a rotating basis.” |
| 5:40:56 P.M. | H.R. 1564 | Considered under suspension of the rules. |
| 5:40:58 P.M. | H.R. 1564 | DEBATE – The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1564. |
| 5:57:49 P.M. | H.R. 1564 | At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed. |
| 5:58:11 P.M. | H.R. 1171 | Mr. DeSantis moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill. H.R. 1171 — “To amend title 40, United States Code, to improve veterans service organizations access to Federal surplus personal property.” |
| 5:58:38 P.M. | H.R. 1171 | Considered under suspension of the rules. |
| 5:58:39 P.M. | H.R. 1171 | DEBATE – The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1171. |
| 6:05:33 P.M. | H.R. 1171 | At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed. |
| 6:06:26 P.M. | The Speaker announced that the House do now recess. The next meeting is scheduled for approximately 6:30 p.m. today |
| 6:06:26 P.M. | The Speaker announced that the House do now recess. The next meeting is scheduled for approximately 6:30 p.m. today | |
| 6:30:55 P.M. | The House convened, returning from a recess continuing the legislative day of July 8. | |
| 6:31:00 P.M. | Mr. Burgess filed a report from the Committee on Rules on H. Res. 288. | |
| 6:32:43 P.M. | UNFINISHED BUSINESS – The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of motions to suspend the rules which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed. | |
| 6:32:59 P.M. | H.R. 1341 | Considered as unfinished business. H.R. 1341 — “To require the Financial Stability Oversight Council to conduct a study of the likely effects of the differences between the United States and other jurisdictions in implementing the derivatives credit valuation adjustment capital requirement.” |
| 6:55:57 P.M. | H.R. 1341 | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 353 – 24 (Roll no. 305). |
| 6:55:58 P.M. | H.R. 1341 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| 6:56:01 P.M. | H.R. 1564 | Considered as unfinished business. H.R. 1564 — “To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to prohibit the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board from requiring public companies to use specific auditors or require the use of different auditors on a rotating basis.” |
| 7:03:01 P.M. | H.R. 1564 | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 321 – 62 (Roll no. 306). |
| 7:03:02 P.M. | H.R. 1564 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| 7:03:38 P.M. | H.R. 1171 | Considered as unfinished business. H.R. 1171 — “To amend title 40, United States Code, to improve veterans service organizations access to Federal surplus personal property.” |
| 7:09:48 P.M. | H.R. 1171 | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 387 – 1 (Roll no. 307). |
| 7:09:49 P.M. | H.R. 1171 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| 7:10:56 P.M. | ONE MINUTE SPEECHES – The House proceeded with further one minute speeches. |
| 10:00:11 P.M. | Mr. King (IA) moved that the House do now adjourn. | |
| 10:00:22 P.M. | On motion to adjourn Agreed to by voice vote. | |
| 10:00:23 P.M. | The House adjourned. The next meeting is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on July 9, 2013. |
——————————————————————————–
You must be logged in to post a comment.