Category Archives: ~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

What is Healthcare Reform … #ACA reminder


The President’s Proposal puts American families and small business owners in control of their own health care.

— It makes insurance more affordable by providing the largest middle class tax cut for health care in history, reducing premium costs for tens of millions of families and small business owners who are priced out of coverage today. This helps over 31 million Americans afford health care who do not get it today — and makes coverage more affordable for many more.— It sets up a new competitive health insurance market giving tens of millions of Americans the exact same insurance choices that members of Congress will have.

— It brings greater accountability to health care by laying out commonsense rules of the road to keep premiums down and prevent insurance industry abuses and denial of care.

— It will end discrimination against Americans with pre-existing conditions.

— It puts our budget and economy on a more stable path by reducing the deficit by $100 billion over the next ten years — and about $1 trillion over the second decade — by cutting government overspending and reining in waste, fraud and abuse.

It includes a targeted set of changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Senate-passed health insurance reform bill. Key changes include:

— Closing the Medicare prescription drug “doughnut hole” coverage gap;— Strengthening the Senate bill‘s provisions that make insurance affordablefor individuals and families;— Strengthening the provisions to fight fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid;— Increasing the threshold for the excise tax on the most expensive health plans from $23,000 for a family plan to $27,500 and starting it in 2018 for all plans;— Improving insurance protections for consumers and creating a new Health Insurance Rate Authority to provide federal assistance and oversight to states in conducting reviews of unreasonable rate increases and other unfair practices of insurance plans.

For more information, check out:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/health-care-meeting

Question … What nearly triggered a nuclear attack?


CloseCalls
Click to view larger image.

Why would we care about Fashion?


RanThis week, we’ve got a huge opportunity to help end deforestation and human rights abuses for fabric production, and we need your help.

This week is Fashion Week in New York, a time where the biggest luxury designers in the world come together to show off their new collections. It’s a big deal in the fashion world, and that makes it a key moment for our Out of Fashion Campaign. We need to make absolutely sure that part of the discussion and buzz around Fashion Week this year is not just about who’s wearing or showing what, but about how to avoid the devastating impacts that the production of rayon and other fabrics and clothing produced from wood fiber in the form of dissolving pulp is having on forests and communities in places like Indonesia, Canada and Brazil.

The impacts of fabrics made from dissolving pulp, made by companies like Royal Golden Eagle Group’s Sateri Ltd., have gone under the radar for years. It’s time for the world’s most fashionable brands to pay attention and be leaders. Luxury fashion shouldn’t come at the price of land stolen from Indigenous Peoples and the loss of endangered forests. Demand that high fashion not only sets the trends for style, but that it also demonstrates leadership on environmental and social issues in the materials it uses.

Add your voice. Together, we can move the fashion industry forward.

Chrsty_TS_HS_New.pngFor the forests,
Christy Tennery-Spalding
http://www.ran.org/

Why Big Oil, Why Not What We Love?


The US and as part of Global Divestment Day thousands of activists around the world will be calling on governments, universities, places of worship, and in some cases, their own families, to pull their investments from the fossil fuel companies that are threatening the future of life on Earth. “Divestment” is about aligning our investments with our values and challenging the political power of an industry that is threatening indigenous peoples, polluting our politics and driving us toward climate catastrophe.

Global Divestment Day was anchored on Valentine’s Day because each act of divestment is calling on political leaders to protect the places that we love.

READ THE REST ON EYE ON THE AMAZON

Fight (At All Costs) Club


By

Congressional Republicans Continue To Play Politics With National Security

There are 15 days (just 5 legislative days) for Congressional Republicans to agree to fund the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) before the agency shuts down, and things are not looking good. Senate and House Republicans have been refusing to pass legislation that will fund the department unless it also dismantles President Obama’s recent executive actions that focus immigration enforcement on felons, not families.

Like they have done in the past holding the U.S. economy hostage by refusing to raise the debt ceiling, and letting the government shutdown because they wanted to take healthcare away from millions of people, now Republicans are playing politics with our national security. Shutting down DHS would have dire consequences. The agency is home to our national security infrastructure, including the Nuclear Detection Office, the Secret Service, Border Patrol and customs officers, TSA, FEMA, and more. Not only would shutting the agency down put our national security at risk, but it would also leave more than 143,000 workers — many of whom risk their lives daily to protect our nation — without a paycheck.

Meanwhile, the president’s immigration plan that is of such concern to the GOP is in fact a big gain for the country on both the national security and economic security fronts. The order allows low-priority immigrants to come forward, pass background checks and apply for deferred action and a work permit, which means fewer people living in the shadows and beyond the rule of law. And under this plan, immigrants would be better integrated into our economy as well: working legally and paying their fair share of taxes would bring in $22.6 billion in new payroll tax revenue over the next 5 years and increase GDP by $90 to $210 billion in the next 10.

The conflict is being driven by tea party Republicans who refuse to pass a clean funding bill — but GOP leadership and other less extreme Republicans refusing to take responsibility and address this ploy deserve equal blame. Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL), for example, has been on both sides of the debate in just the last two days. On Tuesday, he threatened to build “coffins outside each Democratic office” if they didn’t acquiesce to the GOP’s demands and there was a successful attack during a DHS shutdown. On Wednesday, just after polling found that voters in his state favor the President’s immigration action by two-to-one, Kirk changed his tune: “As the governing party, we should govern. I would think we should just pass a regular appropriations bill under regular order.” (Sen. Kirk is up for re-election next year. Coincidence?)

Other conservatives in Congress may continue to refuse to acknowledge the benefits of the president’s actions on immigration, but a majority of Americans do, according to a Public Religion Research Institute poll released today. Nearly three-quarters (73 percent) of Americans want Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform rather than overturn Obama’s policies, including 62 percent of Republicans. And more than three-quarters (76 percent) support the policies included in the president’s action on immigration, including a majority of GOP voters.

BOTTOM LINE: There is no excuse for playing politics with national security, especially at a time when our commander-in-chief is asking Congress to authorize the use of military force in the face of increased national security threats. Congressional Republicans have shown that they are willing to do just that. Now in control of both chambers of Congress, Congressional Republicans are trying to use the funding of essential government programs as leverage to deport parents and children.