Category Archives: ~ politics petitions pollution and pop culture

ECONOMY: Fighting Back On Foreclosures


Yesterday, with the first significant veto of his administration, President Obama rejected the “Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010” — a bill that would have forced states and federal courts to accept notarizations from any notary public in the country, as opposed to only those by state residents. What’s wrong with making paperwork easier? Usually nothing, except an increasing number of Americans are losing their homes via foreclosure due to paperwork errors by banks rushing to expedite the foreclosure process. Some banks aren’t even reading foreclosure forms, with the result being a large and growing number of wrongful foreclosures being pushed through the judicial system. The bill would have made such wrongful foreclosures even easier to accomplish, adding to the already problematic foreclosure problem Americans face. Since more Americans lost their homes in August than in any other previous month, the widespread problems plaguing the foreclosure business must be addressed. Moreover, systematic problems causing so many Americans to lose their homes needs to be tackled head-on.

PAPERWORK PLUNDER:  Earlier this month, Nancy Jacobini called 911 in a panic from her locked bathroom after she heard what sounded like someone breaking the front door to her Florida home. When police arrived, they didn’t find a masked intruder, but rather someone hired by JP Morgan Chase, who said he was changing the locks because Jacobini had been foreclosed upon. There was a larger problem beyond the bank’s intrusive tactics, however: Jacobini was behind in her payments, but the bank had not actually foreclosed on her home. Sadly, paperwork snafus are plaguing the mortgage industry and the millions of Americans facing foreclosure. After several recent news reports about the work of “robo-signers” — bank officials who were routinely signing thousands of foreclosure applications without ever reading them — many banks were forced to stop foreclosures all together and re-evaluate their practices. Bank of America announced today that it is suspending foreclosures in 50 states, and PNC Bank, JP Morgan Chase and Ally Financial have also halted foreclosures. Stories abound about bank officials not even reading the foreclosure forms — Bank of America’s action came after the Associated Press reported that a bank official admitted in a bankruptcy case that she signed 7,000 to 8,000 foreclosure documents a month and “typically” did not read them “because of the volume.” A Chase official, Beth Ann Cottrell, said that she and her co-workers approved 18,000 foreclosures every month without any personal knowledge of the documents. The Washington Post reported the case of Jeffrey Stephan, a Pennsylvania man who signed detailed foreclosure forms for GMAC Mortgage at the rate of one per minute. And a Wells Fargo executive admitted in a deposition that he only checked the dates on the up to 150 foreclosure documents that he signed daily. Unsurprisingly, these tactics have led to a large number of wrongful foreclosures, where households who have not defaulted on their mortgages are foreclosed upon. Considering that the mortgage crisis was caused at least in part by predatory lenders snowing over consumers with excessive, complicated fine print, it’s ironic that the same industry is failing to read it themselves when taking away people’s homes. (Or, as Jon Steward acidly put it last night, “You’re the [expletive] people who came up with fine print in the first place!”)

GOVERNMENT TAKES ACTION: These banks shut down their foreclosures in the face of aggressive and appropriate government inquiry. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), joined by many Democratic and Republican members of Congress, are calling for not only an investigation into the banks’ practices but also a wider moratorium on foreclosures. A bipartisan group of attorneys general is also demanding answers — for example, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican, is asking 30 lenders to stop foreclosures until they can prove it’s being done legally. Even Congressional Republicans like Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby are demanding investigations. Obama’s veto of the notary public bill was almost surely motivated by concerns that too many people were already losing their homes under paperwork that was proceeding too quickly. The legislation has been languishing in the Senate for months and was likely not designed to help banks speed along foreclosures, but on September 27 it quickly and mysteriously was passed by unanimous consent. Salon notes that perhaps “mortgage lenders pressured their allies in the Senate to pass the notarization bill in the hope that it might provide some ex post facto protection for them from the avalanche of law suits that is about to pound the mortgage industry.” Obama’s veto seemed to consider the danger that speeding along paperwork used in mortgages would be harmful, and the President repeatedly cited the need for “consumer protections” in explaining his move.

MOVING FORWARD: These wrongful “paperwork foreclosures” are unfortunately not surprising, given the enormous scale of the larger foreclosure crisis our country is facing. While the banks must vastly improve the methods by which they foreclose on homes, other banks — notably Wells Fargo — should join in the moratorium. But there are larger issues that also need to be resolved. As the Wonk Room’s Pat Garofalo notes in his column for the Center for American Progress today, there are serious flaws with the Obama administration’s signature foreclosure prevention effort, the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). For one, as Garofalo and  former CAP Associate Director for Housing and Economics Andrew Jakabovics first revealed, some institutions like Bank of Americas siphoned borrowers off HAMP and into its own private modification program. CAP proposes taking the modification programs out of the hands of abusive banks: by allowing housing counselors and other public entities to approve mortgage modifications directly, and if the borrower’s servicer doesn’t challenge the modification in 90 days, it automatically becomes permanent. Mortgage mediation programs — in which a bank must meet with a borrower, in the presence of a judge and housing counselors, before finalizing a foreclosure — should also be expanded in cities and states that already have them, or begun in locations where they don’t currently exist. CAP also proposes modifying the rules for Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits, or REMICs, those investment vehicles used to pool and securitize mortgages, in order to accelerate mortgage modifications.

After suicides, Mormon leader rants against gays


Add your name:

 

Human Rights Campaign

 


The recent suicides of several gay teenagers have made national headlines. Yet this is the moment – of all moments – that a top Mormon leader decides to broadcast a verbal rampage against gays to millions of viewers.

I couldn’t believe it either. Boyd K. Packer, the second-highest leader in the Mormon Church, said in a sermon broadcast to millions last Sunday that same-sex attraction is “impure and unnatural” and can be overcome, and that same-sex unions are morally wrong.

Do we need more proof than the suicides of teens as young as 13 that words like these can do unimaginable damage?

We cannot stay silent. By speaking out together, we can show the Mormon Church hierarchy that it has literally risked the lives of children by inciting their tormentors. And we can ensure that the young people who heard this sermon know that it is scientifically wrong and profoundly misguided.

Speaking before 20,000 people and broadcasting to millions more, Packer said same-sex unions are morally wrong and “against God’s law and nature” – and that the church hierarchy would continue to support marriage bans like Proposition 8 (which was funded largely by Mormons).

It makes me physically sick to think how many young lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender kids had to sit in those pews and listen to that venom.

Comments like these are exactly what makes young LGBT kids think there’s no way out but suicide – that their parents will reject them, that their communities will shun them, and that living openly will bring pain or violence – that even God looks on their very identity as a sin to be “overcome.”

And these lies fuel the bullying, harassment, and violence that plague our schools.

Packer’s lies have been disproven over and over again by science and by the spiritual experience of Americans who know their LGBT neighbors and care about them. We know sexual orientation cannot and should not be changed and that two people falling in love is beautiful, not evil.

But unless we refute these lies whenever groups like the anti-LGBT National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and the Mormon Church repeat them – whether through letters like this or projects like HRC‘s www.NOMexposed.com – we risk another young person hearing them and believing that LGBT people are “defective.” And that belief contributes to violence and suicide.

Americans are sick of the Mormon hierarchy trying to dictate what they should believe. They know commitment and love when they see it. That’s why they are turning away in droves from limitations on their friends’ and neighbors’ freedom to marry.

Thank you for helping take a stand for the truth.

Sincerely,

Joe Solmonese
Joe Solmonese
President

Tattoo


25 Days Until the Election

25 Days Until the Election

In jujitsu, whenever you get hit, you turn it right back against your opponent. The same is true in politics.

The Republicans are using the final days of this campaign to attack Democrats with the financial resources of Big Banks, Big Oil, and Big Insurance companies, all channeled through secretive outside groups.

We must turn this force right back against them by tattooing the real agenda of these corporate special interests onto every Republican candidate they are supporting.

Time is running short. We need the support of every Democrat committed to stopping a corporate takeover of our elections to raise the $27,896 more we need before tonight’s TV ad buy deadline hits.

Please contribute $5, $10 or more to the DCCC’s Rapid Response Ad Fund before our Midnight Tonight deadline. Your support will help Democrats remind voters who is behind these secretive outside group attacks and hold the Republicans fully accountable.

These outside groups have euphemistic names like “Americans for Prosperity,” “American Crossroads,” and the “American Future Fund.” That last one is the most ironic, since their singular goal is to take America right back to the past by bringing back the exact same Republican agenda that drove our economy into a terrible ditch.

We cannot remain silent in the face of these attacks on our courageous House Democrats who have worked so hard to move America forward.

As we have learned from our successful election victories, the only answer for this kind of combat is combat.

Please contribute $5, $10 or more to the DCCC’s Rapid Response Ad Fund before our Midnight Tonight deadline. Your support will help Democrats remind voters who is behind these secretive outside group attacks and hold the Republicans fully accountable.

There is no doubt that we will retain our Democratic House Majority as long as we have you in this fight. We cannot wake up on the day after Election Day with any regrets.

Thank you,
Nancy Pelosi
Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the House

P.S. We must turn the force of these secretive outside groups right back around by tattooing their real agenda onto every Republican candidate whom they are supporting. Please contribute to the DCCC’s Rapid Response Ad Fund before our Midnight Tonight deadline.

Tuesday: Stop secret corporate ads in Seattle


 

 

MoveOn members in Seattle are holding a press conference on Tuesday, Oct. 12, 2010, at 12:00 PM to expose the hundreds of thousands of dollars that right-wing groups are spending on ads to deceive voters in Washington. Can you make it? 


RSVP for your local event

 

 

$10 million in one week?!

That’s the amount of money that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is spending right now to attack members of Congress who supported health care reform.1

And they have help. Across the country, we’re seeing deceptive campaign ads from harmless-sounding groups like “American Crossroads” and “Americans for Job Security.” These right-wing corporate front groups are pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into winning back Congress for Republicans.

Too many voters in Washington are seeing the ads but aren’t hearing the truth—so we need to get the word out about who is behind the avalanche of right-wing attack ads.

On Tuesday in Seattle, local MoveOn members will release a new report that details how much money these national groups are spending on swing races in Washington.

Can you come show your support at a brief press conference in Seattle on  Tuesday, Oct. 12, 2010, at 12:00 PM?


http://pol.moveon.org/event/events/event.html?event_id=108991&id=23970-17809870-55iDD8x&t=3We’ve put together this report because no one else has compiled district- and state-level data on this deluge of corporate cash. We need to get this message out to the media and to swing voters in Washington—before it’s too late. 

It’s a busy season for many folks—but coming out to this event is a great way to help fight corporate influence. This is the first big electoral season in the wake of Citizens’ United—and it’s crucial that we speak out together against out-of-control special interests throwing their weight around. Hope you can make it on Tuesday.

Thanks for all you do.

–Ilyse, Amy, Duncan, Eli, and the rest of the team

Source:1. “US Chamber spends more than $10 million on ads.” The Washington Post, Oct. 7, 2010

http://www.moveon.org/r?r=91877&id=23970-17809870-55iDD8x&t=4

 

Reality need not apply


Media Matters for America

Reality need not apply: Fox continues to deny aid to poor is stimulative

http://mediamatters.org/research/201010070027

Fox News hosts and contributors have recently dismissed estimates of food stamp programs’ stimulative effect on the economy as “some strange multiplier effect study,” “liberal math” and a “complicated economic multiplier theory.” In fact, economists agree that food stamps are one of “the most effective ways to prime the economy’s pump.”

Malkin, Gingrich and Varney all dismiss economic theory to continue attacking food stamps

Malkin falsely claims “the only thing that these programs stimulate, of course, is a bigger government.” On the October 7 edition of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, co-host Steve Doocy stated that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said of food stamps: “It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance.”  Fox News contributor Michelle Malkin replied by saying she would “like to know which economist [House Speaker Nancy Pelosi] is talking to. Of course, she’s promoting some strange multiplier effect study to argue this.” Malkin concluded by falsely claiming “the only thing that these programs stimulate, of course, is bigger government.”

Varney dismisses economic consensus regarding stimulative nature of food stamps as a “complicated economic multiplier theory.” Earlier on Fox & Friends, Fox Business Network anchor Stuart Varney dismissed Pelosi’s statement as “the complicated economic multiplier theory that they’re bringing in here.” Varney claimed “the evidence that’s before us” showing that a high proportion of the unemployed are on food stamps and unemployment is still high shows “it would seem you don’t get bigger bang for the buck.”

Varney hosts Santorum to attack food stamps and claim that “the numbers are phony.” On the October 7 edition of Fox Business Network’s Varney & Company, contributor Tracy Byrnes attributed Pelosi’s claim to “the health care calculator that they use…the keys are not working correctly if she’s thinking this is the best bang for our buck.” Fox News contributor Rick Santorum then stated of Pelosi’s claim: “So if that’s the case, why don’t we turn the whole economy over to the government have them pay out all of this money and have a great multiplier effect. It doesn’t work and in fact there have been studies done show just the opposite.” Santorum further claimed “I don’t know where she’s getting the funny numbers, the calculator is not working as Tracy said, but the numbers are phony.”

Gingrich: “I don’t understand how liberal math turns one dollar into $1.79.” On the October 6 edition of Fox News’ On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich said:

I carry around a bumper sticker that says two plus two equals four, so I’d be very curious how a dollar given to somebody becomes $1.79. And I think if we could get that to work at the U.S. Treasury, so if people gave the treasury $1,000, it became $1,790, we could pay off the federal debt and never worry about spending or anything. Somehow, I don’t understand how liberal math turns one dollar into $1.79.

Economists widely acknowledge stimulative nature of food stamps

Elmendorf: “Nutrition assistance” would “have a significant impact on GDP.” In January 27, 2009, written testimony before the House Budget Committee, CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf stated that “[t]ransfers to persons (for example, unemployment insurance and nutrition assistance) would … have a significant impact on GDP.” He added: “Because a large amount of such spending can occur quickly, transfers would have a significant impact on GDP by early 2010. Transfers also include refundable tax credits, which have an impact similar to that of a temporary tax cut.”

Zandi: “[E]xtending food stamps are the most effective ways to prime the economy’s pump.” In his July 24, 2008, written testimony before the House Committee on Small Business, economist Mark Zandi, who advised John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign, stated that “extending food stamps are [sic] the most effective ways to prime the economy’s pump.” Zandi further explained: “People who receive these benefits are very hard-pressed and will spend any financial aid they receive within a few weeks. These programs are also already operating, and a benefit increase can be quickly delivered to recipients.” Zandi included with his testimony a table stating that a “Temporary Increase in Food Stamps” had the highest “Fiscal Economic Bank for the Buck” of any other potential stimulus provision he analyzed, providing a $1.73 increase in real GDP for every dollar spent.

Attack is the latest in Fox’s ongoing assault on aid to poor and unemployed

Fox regularly ignores economic consensus to attack unemployment insurance. As Media Matters has noted, Fox regularly ignores economic consensus and analysis to baselessly attack unemployment insurance. For example:

  • On February 22, Hannity falsely suggested the Federal Reserve said unemployment benefit extension increased unemployment.
  • During the May 15 edition of Fox News’ Bulls & Bears, host Brenda Buttner claimed Americans were “turning down good paying jobs to stay on unemployment. I wish I were kidding.” During the tease, the on-screen graphic said “Cut off freeloaders?”
  • On July 2, Fox & Friends guest host Alisyn Camerota didn’t understand the “logic” behind Pelosi’s claim that unemployment insurance “injects demand into the economy” and “is a job creator.” Guest co-host Clayton Morris said that “would love to know what economists say that.” Co-host Dave Briggs claimed there were a “few holes in that logic to say the least.”
  • On the July 15 edition of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, co-host Brian Kilmeade hosted Partnership Staffing Inc. CEO Bill Auchmoody, who claimed that unemployment benefits prevent unemployed workers from searching for jobs. During the segment, Kilmeade played Pelosi’s comments and asked Auchmoody to comment. Auchmoody stated: “I don’t know how an unemployment check creates jobs. You know, businesses create jobs. The economy and the government getting out of the way, in my opinion, helps create jobs.”  Kilmeade concluded the interview by telling Auchmoody that “maybe”  the elimination of “unemployment benefits will get people to sober up and take some of your offers.”
  • On the August 10 edition of Glenn Beck, Beck said “Nancy Pelosi actually made the point that unemployment payment stimulate [sic] the economy.” After playing the clip, Beck suggested Pelosi was wrong that unemployment insurance creates jobs by saying “have you ever worked for a guy who was saying ‘hang on just a second, I’m going to pay you out of my unemployment check.”
  • On the August 31 edition of Fox & Friends, Fox Business host Stuart Varney cited a Wall Street Journal op-ed by Harvard economics professor and Hoover Institute senior fellow Robert Barro to claim that, in Varney’s words, “If we had not extended unemployment benefits to 99 weeks from the standard 26 weeks, [Barro] says, unemployment would be at 6.8%, not the 9.5%.” According to Varney, Barro argued that “you extend benefits like this and it discourages people from going out to look for work especially, you know, the start of the benefit period because it’s nearly two years.”
  • On the September 16 edition of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, Stuart Varney attacked the unemployed by falsely claiming that rises in disability were due to the unemployed committing fraud. In fact, what led to the increase in claims from 2008 to 2009 was legislation that President Bush signed into law in 2008, which changed the ways that the requirements for being disabled could be interpreted. The growth in the program was expected and is the result of intentional changes to policy which make it easier to qualify.
  • During the September 29 edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Gretchen Carlson asked “when will the government turn off government spending and extend tax cuts to stimulate the private sector.” Carlson was referring to a program that “directly paid the salaries of unemployed people so they could get jobs in government, at nonprofit organizations and at many small businesses.