Tag Archives: Climate Change

What Happened in Cancun



We just returned from the UN climate change conference in Cancún. At best, the results are mixed.

The good news is that over 190 countries agreed on aid to the world’s poor who are coping with climate change impacts such as malaria, drought, and extreme weather. These leaders also agreed on programs that promote clean technology and rainforest conservation.

The bad news is that we still don’t have a fair and effective solution to stop climate change. We are disappointed that world leaders don’t grasp the urgency of this crisis nor the opportunities that clean energy solutions provide.

We are still committed to building a new green economy. High-level negotiations continue to stall but we’re working with a new generation of innovators and entrepreneurs with the vision to build a sustainable global economy from the ground up.

COP16 was the stage for the official launch of Earth Day Network’s Women and the Green Economy (WAGE) initiative. In partnership with the U.N. Foundation, we are working with leaders like Mary Robinson, former President of Ireland, to galvanize women entrepreneurs into a force that will green the global economy and advance climate solutions.

Do your part. Let’s show our leaders that we demand an ambitious treaty. Share your reaction to COP16 and show support for effective new agreements that can reduce pollution, stop climate change and save our planet!

Thank you for everything you do,

The Earth Day Network Team
www.earthday.org

P.S. With your help we can make Billion Acts of Green and Earth Day 2011 strong referendums on climate change and the need for a green economy. We have only a year until the next UN climate summit to galvanize the support of nations.

P.P.S. You can make a difference by supporting Earth Day Network’s climate initiatives through our online store.

ENVIRONMENT Climate Consensus In Cancun


In the early hours of Saturday morning, the nations of the world rediscovered consensus on addressing global warming pollution at the international climate convention in Cancun, Mexico. The top challenge for negotiators has been to figure out a successor framework to the Kyoto Protocol, which failed to set limits on the pollution of the United States (because the Senate refused to ratify the treaty) and nations like China and India (as developing countries, they are exempt from Kyoto‘s binding targets). As a result, the Kyoto Protocol now restricts less than 30 percent of global warming pollution. In Copenhagen, nearly all the nations tried to forge a new framework for cleaning their economies, but w ere not able to achieve global consensus because of the objections of five countries. As hosts of the 2010 conference, the Mexican government had to not only bring parties together to come to agreement on policy, but also to restore trust in global governance — the concept that the world’s nations can work together as one on the problems that face all of humanity. With a roar of applause overwhelming Bolivia’s sole dissenting voice, they strongly endorsed the Cancun Agreements, a series of building blocks that will allow the United States and China — the world’s top economies and top polluters — to join the fight against global warming.

CLIMATE DESTRUCTION: A new report from humanitarian organization Dara projects that there will be a million climate deaths per year by 2030, nearly all of them in the least developed nations. The deaths are preventable if a sufficient international adaptation effort is funded. The destruction from a polluted climate is already here, as can be seen from the global events during the two weeks of the Cancun conference. High-temperature records were broken in California, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada and Arizona; heavy rainfall set “records across the Pacific Northwest,” and Arctic winds “brought intense cold to the Midwest and eastern United States.” The worst wildfires in Israel’s history, fueled by record warmth and drought, “have destroyed large sections of Israel’s northern area” and killed 41 people. Floods hit Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro and Serbia after “three weeks of torrential rains,” forcing the evacuation of tens of thousands of people. Nearly 30 people froze to death in Poland, and thirty more were killed in the rest of Europe. “The death toll from the incessant rains in Venezuela has risen to 34,” with “more than 70,000 people who have been affected” by the catastrophic floods. In India, “more than 150 people have died following heavy rains in the coastal districts of Tamil Nadu over the past few days.” Devastating flooding in Colombia that “left at least 176 people dead and 225 injured, as well as 1.5 million people homeless nationwide” forced Colombia’s president, Juan Manuel Santos, to cancel his scheduled trip to the talks. A “massive wildfire in Tibet‘s Sichuan province killed 22 people.” In a demonstration of solidarity in the climate crisis, Palestinian firefighters were some of the first to help Israel fight the unprecedented wildfires in the divided nation. Speaking at the funeral of a wildfire victim, Israeli President Shimon Peres said the wildfire “disaster taught us that all of us, Jews, Arabs, Druze, and other peoples, share the same fate.”

CLIMATE AGREEMENTS: The Cancun Agreements are the first real step toward building an international system that involves all global warming pollution — not just that produced by the rich nations governed by the Kyoto Protocol. One agreement allows for the future development of the Kyoto Protocol system. The other establishes an international Green Climate Fund, and enacts mechanisms to fight deforestation and deploy clean technology in the developing world. The agreements & quot;established a temperature target for mitigation, a system of MRV [measurement, reporting, and verification], an agreement on forestry and land use, technology transfer, adaptation, and the architecture for a climate fund that apply to all parties and not just developed countries,” summarizes Center for American Progress Senior Fellow Andrew Light. “A lot is left unanswered, most critically the gap between the national pledges for reductions in carbon pollution under the Copenhagen Accord and the now-confirmed 2ºC target in the Cancun Agreements.” The agreements require the parties to take up this issue at their next meeting in Durban, South Africa in 2011. “Looking forward, countries now have to deliver on the commitments to the systems they’ve designed,” writes Center for American Progress expert Richard Caperton. “With the structure of a climate fund decided, the next step is figuring out how the fund will operate, and where its money will come from. With the rules for monitoring carbon emissions reductions in place, the next step is to move forward with deciding how much emissions need to be reduced to make the world safe for future generations.”

CLIMATE EXTREMISTS: Bolivian President Evo Morales used the conference as a stage to solidify his position with the populist left in Latin America. On Thursday, Morales came to Cancun and rallied with representatives of the world’s indigenous peoples and the peasant movement Via Campesina, a global coalition representing 150 million small farmers, who fear the United Nations’ market-based approach to solving global warming. Bolivia’s posturing against international consensus included a passionate defense of small island states and African nations, who are most threatened by global warming — even though those nations unanimously supp orted the Cancun Agreements. Bolivia’s position that no progress is better than insufficient progress rang false to those who had the most at stake. Back in the United States, oil-funded conservatives attacked the climate negotiations, using similarly extreme arguments to appeal to the right. “I know for a fact that global warming, climate change, whatever term they attach to it,” declaimed Rush Limbaugh, “is nothing more than an attempt to create socialist nations as far around the world as they can and to separate us from our money.” Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) led a group of Republican senators attacking the scientific basis for protecting the most vulnerable people in the world from global warming. Fox News, owned by billionaire Rupert Murdoch and Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal, ran multiple segments arguing the United Nations wants to destroy free-market capitalism in the name of climate change. The Koch Industries tea-party group Americans For Prosperity claimed climate scientists “never met a regulation on mankind they didn’t like.”

from Change.org


Change.org
Join the 1 Billion People Fighting Global Hunger 

Take Action

“The defining human tragedy of this century.”

That’s how a recent Oxfam report described the fact that rapid climate change is exacerbating hunger all around the globe.

It’s a story that’s too often missed. And as world leaders gather at a climate change summit in Cancun this week, we have just a few days to shine a bright light on how climate is intimately connected to hunger.

Stand up for the world’s poor and fight hunger now.

Evidence of the changing climate’s impact on hunger is everywhere.

We saw it in Pakistan, where massive, devastating floods swamped farmland, decimated crops, and left more than 10 million people in dire need of food aid.

We’ve seen it in Russia, where droughts have driven the price of wheat sky-high in some regions, increasing the number of struggling families.

And we see it in Kenya, where farmers no longer know when to expect rain, causing seasons of failed harvests.

The World Food Programme estimates that climate change is expected to add another 10-20% to the total of hungry people by 2050. The poor and malnourished are especially vulnerable to the impacts of extreme weather and climate-related natural disasters. And, as rainfalls become more sporadic and temperatures increase, hundreds of millions of farmers worldwide will have to abandon traditional crops and try to adapt.

Take a stand against hunger now, before the talks in Cancun conclude.

And once you add your name, will you forward this email to friends and family and encourage them to do the same?

Thanks for taking action,

The Change.org team

 

Proof that we’ll do just about anything for you… a Video from -Rainforest Action Network


Rainforest Action Network

The Wall Street Journal calls us “some of the savviest environmental agitators in the business.” For the debut of this video, we call ourselves “shamelessly grateful to all the people who make our work possible.” Please enjoy this RAN-tastic dancefest as a priceless little thank you gift from us to you.

Thank You Video from RAN

Rebecca Tarbotton Enjoy!
Rebecca Tarbotton
Executive Director
Rainforest Action Network
Twitter: @BeckyTarbotton

ENVIRONMENT: Climate Zombie Caucus


One year ago, the right-wing media machine smeared climate scientists with the “Climategate” conspiracy theory, even as the climate itself continued to get hotter and more destructive and other countries seized the clean-energy initiative. Although the National Academies of Science says “the U.S. should act now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and develop a national strategy to adapt to the inevitable impacts of climate change,” the Republican Party is now dominated by fossil-funded ideologues who repeat zombie myths about global warming. An exclusive survey by the Progress Report, with research support by Daily Kos blogger RL Miller, has identified the members of Congress from nearly every state in the union that are on record challenging the scientific consensus on climate change. This denier bloc is fueled by remarkable amounts of spending from fossil fuel polluters. The greenhouse pollution industry spent $543 million in lobbying expenditures since 2009 to shape or kill climate legislation — ExxonMobil alone spent more than the entire pro-environment lobby. Fossil interests spent more than $68.5 million this year on “misleading and fictitious televisions ads designed to shape midterm elections and advance their anti-clean energy reform agenda,” and they have contributed over $48 million to candidates.

CLIMATE ZOMBIE CAUCUS : In January 2011, the 112th Congress will open session, with a huge contingent of Republicans who have explicitly rejected the threat of manmade global warming pollution. These climate zombies express the classic variants of global warming denial: that the planet is not warming , that cold weather refutes concerns about global warming, that man’s influence is unclear, that climate scientists are engaged in a hoax, scam, or corrupt conspiracy, and that limiting greenhouse pollution would have no impact on global temperatures. There are no freshmen Republicans, in the House or Senate, who publicly accept the scientific consensus that greenhouse pollution is an immediate threat — but most of them signed onto the Koch IndustriesNo Climate Tax” pledge. Seventy-six percent of the Republicans in the U.S. Senate next year and 52 percent of Republicans in the House of Representatives publicly question the science of global warming. All four candidates set to take over the House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL), Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), and Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL) — have disparaged climate scientists and climate policy. Rep. Ralph Hall (R-TX), who is taking over the House Committee on Science and Technology, believes that the “scientific data, from which global warming theories emerged, has been manipulated, enhanced or deleted” and that “reasonable people have serious questions about our knowledge of the state of the science.”

REALITY-BASED CONSERVATIVES : This iron wall of denial about the moral issue of our time does not sit well with all conservatives. As former Republican Rep. Joe Scarborough (FL) said last week on his MSNBC show, “it’s embarrassing.” “I’m a conservative Republican,” Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) said in a recent hearing on climate science, “but on these kinds of issues I’m not an idiot.” At the same hearing, outgoing Rep. Bob Inglis (R-SC) derided his Republican colleagues for refusing to acknowledge the truth and danger of global warming. In a Washington Post op-ed, former Republican Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) articulated his confusion as to why “so many Republican senators and representatives think they are right and the world’s top scientific academies and scientists are wrong.” Allowing for debate over policy, Boehlert said he finds the GOP’s “dogged determination” to deny the actual science “incomprehensible.” The GOP is rebuking the approach of “leaders of some of our nation’s most prominent businesses,” says Boehlert. The U.S. Climate Action Partnership, for example, is “no collection of mom-and-pop shops operated by ‘tree huggers'” but rather a group of “hard-nosed, profit-driven capitalists” like General Electric, Duke Energy, and DuPont pushing Congress to see climate change as an opportunity to “create more economic opportunities than risks for the U.S. economy.” “My fellow Republicans should understand that wholesale, ideologically based or special-interest-driven rejection of science is bad policy,” he said. “And that in the long run, it’s also bad politics.”

SCIENTISTS RESPOND :  Led by climatologist John Abraham of St. Thomas University, a “climate rapid response team” of a few dozen top climate scientists have “decided to put their spare time to use fielding media questions about climate science, and even going up against hostile anti-science audiences,” launching ClimateRapidResponse.org today. Earlier this year, Abraham had comprehensively debunked global warming denier Christopher Monckton’s testimony in 126 slides, called A Scientist Replies to Lord Monckton . As “a Utah Republican who thinks his party is headed for a giant belly flop by constantly promoting anti-science,” geoscientist Barry Bickmore of Brigham Young University has challenged Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) for his “intellectual laziness” in rejecting climate science. Following work by independent science bloggers, USA Today reports that Rep. Joe Barton’s (R-TX) “influential 2006 congressional report that raised questions about the validity of global warming research was partly based on material copied from textbooks, Wikipedia and the writings of one of the scientists criticized in the report, plagiarism experts say.” Meanwhile, the work of the climate community continues. Climate scientists are reporting catastrophic changes in coral reefs, phytoplankton, sea ice, permafrost, and global ecosystems, while clean-energy technologists, supported by $90 billion from the Obama administration’s Recovery Act, are building solutions. “The government is also thinking about the environment, energy independence and national security,” said AltaRock CEO Don O’Shei, “and they want to catalyze technologies that will create whole new industries.”