Tag Archives: Republican

Juan Sepulveda, Democrats.org


Almost every single Republican member of Congress voted to make 800,000 young people who came to the United States through no fault of their own vulnerable to deportation.

That’s a position even further to the right than the one held by the man they nominated for president last year, Mitt Romney — who advocated for self-deportation.

Share this graphic with your friends, and let them know what happened this morning:The new House GOP immigration planLast year, President Obama announced that these young people — sometimes called DREAMers — who contribute to our country by serving in the military or going to college, can request relief and apply for work visas. But now Republicans in Congress are trying to take that away.

President Obama can’t create a permanent solution for these young people by himself — only Congress can do that. Today’s vote was a major step back in the fight for common-sense immigration reform, and we need to hold the House Republicans who voted to put the DREAMers at risk for deportation accountable.

The key question moving forward is whether the GOP-led House moves in the direction of common-sense immigration reform that fixes our broken system and creates a path to earned citizenship, or whether it goes backwards and targets young people that are here through no fault of their own and who are contributing to our communities every day.

Share the above graphic with your friends and family, and encourage them to join us here:

http://my.democrats.org/Dream

Thanks,

Juan

Juan Sepulveda
Senior Advisor for Hispanic Affairs
Democratic National Committee

P.S. — President Obama will not give up on this issue — and neither will the Democrats fighting for it.

Immigration reform bill


 

immigrationWe are fast approaching the critical moment that our movement has made possible: S. 744, the bipartisan immigration bill, is expected to be introduced to the full Senate early next week for debate, amendment and a full vote.

We must keep up the pressure to ensure the bill we have been fighting for continues to move forward.

Dial 888-891-3271 or click here to call your Senator now.

We have proven the power of our movement before. Our calls, faxes, and contacts to the Senate helped advance the bill this far — but as this bill moves to the full Senate, it will be even more vulnerable to amendments that could jeopardize the path to citizenship for millions of families.

Dial 888-891-3271 or click here to call your Senator in support of reform with a path to citizenship.

The Senate has the opportunity to make history by passing a reform law that keeps families together and strengthens our country by creating a pathway to full citizenship. We must make sure that the Senate passes this important bill. Millions of American families depend on it.

Click here to be immediately connected to your Senator and tell them to support immigration reform.

With hope,

Donna De La Cruz Reform Immigration FOR America

P.S. We need your help to ensure that Congress hears our message. Forward this email to your friends — together we will make immigration reform a reality!

the Senate considers S.954,the Farm bill :::::: CONGRESS :::::: the House has hearings &


 House chamber in session

The Senate will convene at 10:00am on Tuesday, June 4, 2013.

  • Following any Leader remarks, the Senate will be in a period of morning business for one hour with the Majority controlling the first half and the Republicans controlling the final half.
  • Following morning business, the Senate will resume consideration of S.954, the Farm bill.
  • The Senate will recess from 12:30pm until 2:15pm to allow for the weekly caucus meetings.
  • This afternoon prior to the recess for the weekly caucus meetings, Senator Murray asked unanimous consent the Senate proceed to the consideration of Calendar #33, H.Con.Res.25; the amendment at the desk, which is the text of S.Con.Res.8, the budget resolution passed by the Senate, be inserted in lieu thereof; and that H.Con.Res.25, as amended, be agreed to. Further, that the Senate insist on its amendment, request a conference with the House on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses; and the Chair be authorized to appoint conferees on the part of the Senate; and that following the authorization, two motions to instruct conferees be in order from each side:- Motion to instruct relative to the debt limit; and- Motion to instruct relative to taxes/revenue;That there be two hours of debate equally divided between the two Leaders, or their designees, prior to votes in relation to the motions; further, that no amendments be in order to either of the motions prior to the votes; all of the above occurring with no intervening action or debate.Senator Rubio requested to modify Senator Murray’s request to go to a conference without having the debt limit raised within that conference.  Senator Murray objected to Senator Rubio’s request to modify and finally, Senator Rubio objected to Senator Murray’s original request.  Senator McCain also spoke about his objections to Senator Rubios’s modification. The unofficial transcript is below.12:15:00 NSP (MRS. MURRAY) { NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT }MRS. MURRAY: THANK YOU, MADAM PRESIDENT. MADAM PRESIDENT,SENATE DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN WAITING ATIME TO GO TO CONFERENCE ON OUR BUDGET. IN FACT, IT HAS NOW

    BEEN 73 DA DAYS. AND UNTIL RECENTLY, WE’VE GOTTEN PRETTY USED

    TO SENATE REPUBLICANS JUST SIMPLY STANDING UP AND SAYING, “NO.”

    FOR MONTHS, REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN OFFERING A LOT OF EXCUSES FOR

    WHY THEY DON’T WANT TO GO TO CONFERENCE ON THE BUDGET. THEY

    HAVE SAID THEY WANT A PRECONFERENCE FRAMEWORK WHICH, BY THE

    WAY, IS WHAT A BUDGET IS. THEY HAVE SAID THEY WOULDN’T ALLOW US

    TO GO TO CONFERENCE UNTIL WE GUARANTEED THAT THE WEALTHIEST

    AMERICANS AND BIGGEST CORPORATIONS WOULD BE PROTECTED FROM

    PAYING A PENNY MORE IN TAXES. THEY SAID THEY DIDN’T WANT A

    BIPARTISAN CONFERENCE TO TAKE AWAY THE LEVERAGE THEY HAVE ON

    THE DEBT CEILING. AND THEN THEY CALLED FOR A DO-OVER, WHICH

    ACTUALLY MY RANKING MEMBER ON THE BUDGET CALLED FOR AGAIN THIS

    MORNING. TO BRING UP THE HOUSE BUDGET, HAVE 50 HOURS OF DEBATE,

    A WHOLE NEW ROUND OF UNLIMITED AMENDMENTS, GO THROUGH THE

    PROCESS ALL OVER AGAIN. AND THEY DID THIS AFTER THEY PRAISED

    THE VERY OPEN AND THOROUGH FLOOR DEBATE WE HAD ON THE SENATE

    BUDGET. SO, MADAM PRESIDENT, THE STORY KEEPS CHANGING. BUT EVEN

    AS SOME REPUBLICANS WERE FOCUSED ON FINDING EXCUSES TO MOVE US

    CLOSER AND CLOSER TO THIS CRISIS RATHER THAN HAVE A BUDGET

    DEAL, WE HAVE A NUMBER OF REPUBLICANS WHO ARE NOW JOINING WITH

    US TO CALL ON REGULAR ORDER. SENATOR COBURN SAID THAT BLOCKING

    CONFERENCE IS, AND I QUOTE, NOT A GOOD POSITION TO BE IN.

    SENATOR BOZEMAN SAID — QUOTE — HE WOULD VERY MUCH LIKE TO SEE

    A CONFERENCE. SENATOR WICKER SAID WEEKS AGO THAT — QUOTE –

    “BY THE END OF NEXT WEEK, WE SHOULD BE READY TO GO TO

    CONFERENCE.” SO WE HAVE KNOWN FOR A WHILE THAT BLOCKING REGULAR

    ORDER, ESPECIALLY AFTER CALLING FOR IT SO EAGERLY JUST A MATTER

    OF MONTHS AGO, WAS NOT SITTING WELL WITH A NUMBER OF OUR

    REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES. AND NOW ACCORDING TO “POLITICO,” MORE

    REPUBLICANS APPEAR TO FAVOR HEADING TO CONFERENCE THAN BLOCKING

    IT. MADAM PRESIDENT, I WELCOME THAT. WE NEED TO MOVE THIS TO

    CONFERENCE. IT IS THE REGULAR ORDER. IT WILL ALLOW US TO SOLVE

    OUR COUNTRY’S PROBLEMS, AND WE — WE TRULY NEED A PROCESS TO

    ALLOW US TO DEAL WITH OUR NATION’S PROBLEMS. MADAM PRESIDENT,

    SENATOR McCAIN IS ON THE FLOOR, AND I WANT TO THANK HIM BECAUSE

    HE UNDERSTANDS THE IMPORTANCE, NOT JUST FOR THIS BILL BUT FOR

    ALL LEGISLATION IN THE SENATE, THAT WE COME HERE, WE

    COMPROMISE, WE FIGHT HARD FOR WHAT WE BELIEVE IN, BUT AT THE

    END OF THE DAY JUST SAYING MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY, EVEN IF

    YOU’RE A SMALL MINORITY, DOESN’T MOVE THIS COUNTRY TO THE PLACE

    WHERE WE NEED IT TO GET TO. IT ISN’T A CRISIS BY MANAGEMENT

    PLACE. AND I THANK HIM FOR TAKING A LEAD AND CALLING FOR

    REGULAR ORDER. HE HAS SAID THAT REPUBLICAN PRECONDITIONS LIKE

    DEMANDING THE CONFERENCE AGREE TO NOT RAISE THE DEBT CEILING OR

    RAISE TAXES ARE ABSOLUTELY OUT OF LINE AND UNPRECEDENTED.

    SENATOR COLLINS JOINED US ON THE FLOOR A FEW WEEKS AGO TO SAY

    THAT EVEN THOUGH THERE IS A LOT WE DON’T SEE EYE TO EYE ON, WE

    SHOULD AT LEAST GO TO CONFERENCE AND MAKE OUR BEST EFFORT TO

    GET A DEAL. MADAM PRESIDENT, I COULDN’T AGREE MORE. THE

    STALLING THAT WE HAVE SEEN IS, AS SOME HAVE SAID ON THEIR SIDE,

    A LITTLE BIZARRE AND IRONIC, TO SAY THE LEAST, ESPECIALLY AFTER

    I WOULD REMIND EVERYONE 50 HOURS OF DEBATE, INNUMERABLE

    AMENDMENTS THAT TOOK US WAY INTO THE EARLY HOURS, WE OFFERED

    EVERYBODY THE CHANCE TO SPEAK OUT, AND AFTER THAT SESSION WAS

    OVER, MANY OF OUR REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES CAME TO ME PERSONALLY

    AND THANKED ME FOR FINALLY HAVING AN OPEN PROCESS. IF THEY WANT

    US TO HAVE AN OPEN PROCESS, THEN THEY HAVE TO TAKE THAT PROCESS

    AND TAKE IT TO THE NEXT STEP. SO, MADAM PRESIDENT, I AM DEEPLY

    CONCERNED. WE ARE MOVING TOWARDS ANOTHER MANUFACTURED CRISIS

    THIS FALL. WE HAVE OUR APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEES THAT NEED TO

    MOVE FORWARD. THE COUNTRY IS VERY CLEARLY TIRED OF THIS COUNTRY

    BEING MANAGED BY CRISIS, AND WE JUST HAD A BUDGET HEARING THIS

    MORNING WHERE OUR WITNESSES, BOTH REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS

    ALIKE, SAID THAT MOVING US TO A CONSERVED CRISIS WOULD IMPACT

    THIS ECONOMY IN A HORRIFIC WAY THIS FALL. WE DO NOT NEED TO

    HAVE THAT HAPPEN. I WANT TO GO TO CONFERENCE. DO I WANT TO HAVE A COMPROMISE?

    NOT REALLY. I LOVE WHERE I STAND, BUT I HAVE BEEN HERE A LONG

    TIME. YOU DON’T GET EVERYTHING YOU WANT, BUT YOU DO HAVE TO

    COMPROMISE IN ORDER TO MOVE THE COUNTRY FORWARD. AND I AM

    WILLING TO GO TO CONFERENCE WITH MY COUNTERPART, CHAIRMAN RYAN,

    WHO IS ON A VERY DIFFERENT PAGE THAN I AM, AND FIND OUR

    COMPROMISE AND BE WILLING TO MOVE THAT FORWARD HERE IN THE

    CONGRESS SO WE CAN GET TO A PLACE THAT ALLOWS US TO BE ABLE TO

    LEAD THIS COUNTRY AGAIN. SO, MADAM PRESIDENT, I THINK WE ARE AT

    A VERY CRITICAL POINT. I SEE SENATOR McCAIN IS ON THE FLOOR. I

    WOULD BE HAPPY TO YIELD TO HIM FOR A COMMENT.

    MR. McCAIN: MADAM PRESIDENT, PRESIDENT, –

    THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE SENATOR FROM ARIZONA.

    MR. McCAIN: I UNDERSTAND THAT ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES WHO WILL

    OBJECT IS COMING TO THE FLOOR, SO PERHAPS I WOULD RESERVE THE

    RIGHT TO OBJECT ON — ON HIS BEHALF EVEN THOUGH I’M IN STARK

    DISAGREEMENT. BUT INSTEAD, I’LL JUST MAKE A COMMENT AND I’M

    SURE THAT MY COLLEAGUE WILL — ON THIS SIDE OF THE AISLE WILL

    VOICE AN OBJECTION WHEN HE ARRIVES. HE’S HERE.

    MRS. MURRAY: I CAN GO AHEAD AND OFFER THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT AT

    THIS TIME AND WE CAN MOVE FROM THERE.

    MR. McCAIN: IF IT’S OKAY WITH THE SENATOR, BECAUSE WE KNOW

    WHAT’S GOING TO HAPPEN. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO MAKE REMARKS AND

    THEN THE SENATOR FROM FLORIDA WILL MAKE THE SAME ARGUMENT THAT

    WE HAVE MADE THE LAST FEW DAYS, AND FORTUNATELY I DON’T HAVE TO

    BE LISTEN AGAIN. FOR FOUR YEARS, MEMBERS ON THIS SIDE OF THE

    AISLE ARGUED STRENUOUSLY THAT WE WERE DOING A GREAT DISSERVICE

    TO THE COUNTRY BY NOT TAKING UP AND DEBATING AND AMENDING A

    BUDGET THAT WOULD THEN GO TO CONFERENCE WITH THE HOUSE OF

    REPRESENTATIVES — THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CAPITOL, THE HOUSE OF

    REPRESENTATIVES, AND THEN WE WOULD DO WHAT WE EXPECT, AND

    UNFORTUNATELY EVERY FAMILY IN AMERICA HAS TO DO, AND THAT IS TO

    PASS A BUDGET UNDER WHICH WE WOULD BE GUIDED IN OUR

    AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS. NOW, MY COLLEAGUE

    FROM FLORIDA WILL COME TO THE FLOOR AND SAY THAT WE HAVE

    AMASSED A DEBT BECAUSE OF THE BUDGET, BUT WE DIDN’T HAVE A

    BUDGET FOR FOUR YEARS, SO HOW CAN YOU ARGUE THAT THE FACT THAT

    WE MAY HAVE TO — WE MAY GO TO CONFERENCE ON A BUDGET, THAT

    SOMEHOW THAT WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEBT?

    OBVIOUSLY, IT’S NONSENSE. OBVIOUSLY, IT’S NONSENSE. JUST AS

    FRANKLY IT WAS NONSENSE WHEN THE SAME GROUP OF SENATORS SAID WE

    SHOULDN’T EVEN DEBATE GUN MEASURES IN LIGHT OF A TRAGEDY THAT

    TOOK PLACE IN CONNECTICUT AND ANOTHER TRAGEDY THAT TOOK PLACE

    IN TUCSON, ARIZONA. DIDN’T EVEN WANT TO TAKE UP AND DEBATE A

    WAY THAT SOME OF US HAD IDEAS TO TRY TO KEEP THE WEAPONS OUT OF

    THE HANDS OF CRIMINALS, AND THE HANDS OF THE MENTALLY ILL. SO

    NOW WE HAVE A SENATE WHERE WE REFUSE TO MOVE FORWARD ON ISSUES

    AND HAVE OPEN DEBATE AND DISCUSSION AND VOTES. I ALWAYS

    BELIEVED IN THE YEARS I HAVE BEEN HERE WITH REPUBLICAN AND

    DEMOCRAT MAJORITIES THAT THE WAY WE ARE SUPPOSED TO FUNCTION IS

    TO SAY OKAY, LET’S GIVE IT OUR BEST SHOT AND LET’S DO THE BEST

    WE CAN AND LET’S HAVE VOTES. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS OUR

    OBJECTIONS AGAIN TO THE MAJORITY LEADER WAS THAT HE WOULDN’T

    LET US HAVE VOTES ON AMENDMENTS. WE HAD I HAVE FORGOTTEN HOW

    MANY VOTES ON THE BUDGET THAT LASTED

    UNTIL, I BELIEVE, AROUND 7:00 IN THE MORNING. SO THE OPPONENTS

    OF MOVING FORWARD ON ANYTHING CAN’T ARGUE WE DIDN’T HAVE VOTES

    ON THE BUDGET, CAN’T ARGUE THAT THEY WERE BLOCKED FROM WHATEVER

    AMENDMENT THAT THEY WANTED TO HAVE VOTED ON, SO NOW WE’RE FACED

    WITH A SITUATION WHERE WE WILL NOT GO TO CONFERENCE, AND I WANT

    TO TELL MY COLLEAGUES THAT CONTINUE TO DO THIS THAT, WITH MY

    STRENUOUS OBJECTIONS, THE MAJORITY WILL BECOME FRUSTRATED AND

    THE MAJORITY CAN CHANGE THE RULES OF THE SENATE, THEY CAN DO

    THAT. AND I MUST SAY THAT ALTHOUGH I

    WOULD STRENUOUSLY. MAJORITY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CAPITOL IS

    OF OUR PARTY. THAT’S REALLY VERY DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.

    UNLESS YOU TAKE THE WORD OF ONE PI MY COLLEAGUES TO CAME TO

    FLOOR AND SAID I DON’T TRUST DEMOCRATS AND I DON’T TRUST

    REPUBLICANS. LET ME REPEAT WHAT HE SAID. I DON’T TRUST

    DEMOCRATS AND I DON’T TRUST REPUBLICANS. IT’S NOT A MATTER OF

    TRUSTING DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS. WHAT THIS IS A MATTER OF IS

    WHETHER WE WILL GO THROUGH THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS THAT PEOPLE

    SENT US HERE TO DO. AND I’VE PROBABLY LOST MANY MORE TIMES THAN

    I HAVE WON. BUT I’VE BEEN SATISFIED IN THE TIMES THAT I HAVE

    LOST THAT I WAS ABLE TO MAKE MY ARGUMENT, WAS — PUT IT TO THE

    WILL OF THE BODY AND IT WAS EITHER ACCEPTED OR REJECTED. THAT’S

    HOW PEOPLE, SCHOOL CHILDREN ALL OVER AMERICA, EXPECT TO US

    BEHAVE. THAT’S THE WAY OUR CONSTITUTION IS WRITTEN. THAT’S WHAT

    THIS BODY IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT. SO WHEN WE HAVE A — BY THE

    WAY, MADAM PRESIDENT, THIS IS THE LAST TIME I’M GOING TO COME

    TO THE FLOOR ON THIS EXERCISE BECAUSE IT’S OBVIOUSLY A

    FRUITLESS KIND OF EFFORT, UNTIL SOMETHING CHANGES. AND

    OBVIOUSLY THAT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE SHORT TERM. NOW, MY

    FRIENDS ON THE — WILL BE SAYING THEY’RE REAGAN REPUBLICANS,

    YOU’RE A REAGAN REPUBLICAN. I WAS HERE WHEN RONALD REAGAN WAS

    PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. PRESIDENT REAGAN RIGHTLY OR

    WRONGLY PASSED AMNESTY FOR THREE MILLION PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY

    ILLEGALLY. HE SAT DOWN WITH TIP O’NEILL AND THEY SAVED SOCIAL

    SECURITY FROM BANKRUPTCY. RONALD REAGAN-RANK SAT DOWN WITH THE

    DEMOCRATS AND THEY AGREED IN WAYS OF INCREASING REVENUES AND

    CUTTING SPENDING. RONALD REAGAN’S RECORD IS VERY CLEAR. AND, BY

    THE WAY, IT WAS ONE OF AN ASSERTIVE ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES

    OF AMERICA AND LEADERSHIP IN THE WORLD AND NOT COME HOME TO

    FORTRESS AMERICA. SO SOMETIMES WHEN I HEAR MY COLLEAGUES HERE

    TALK ABOUT HOW THEY ARE RONALD REAGAN REPUBLICANS, I DON’T

    THINK RONALD REAGAN WOULD HAVE DISAGREED WE SHOULD HAVE A

    BUDGET. WE SHOULD HAVE A BUDGET FOR — TO GUIDE THE LEGISLATIVE

    AGENDA OF THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES. SO AS I SAID, I

    WON’T BE COMING BACK TO THE FLOOR AGAIN WHILE MY COLLEAGUES

    OBJECT AND I SEE MY COLLEAGUE FROM UTAH THAT WAS SO UNFAMILIAR

    WITH THE — WITH WHAT WE DO HERE THAT HE CLAIMED IT WAS BEHIND

    CLOSED DOORS IN BACK ROOMS WHEN THE FACT IS THE BUDGET

    CONFERENCE IS ON C-SPAN AND OPEN TO ALL. SO I CAN JUST SAY TO

    MY COLLEAGUES THIS IS NOT A PROUD MOMENT FOR ME AS WE BLOCK A

    PROCESS THAT WAS AGREED TO AND ENACTED FOR MANY, MANY YEARS,

    WAS NOT ENACTED FOR FOUR YEARS OVER THE STRENUOUS OBJECTIONS OF

    MYSELF AND MY COLLEAGUES WHO DID NOT ENACT A BUDGET, WE ENACTED

    A BUDGET AFTER AN ALL-NIGHTMARE THON OF VOTE AFTER VOTE AFTER

    VOTE ON LITERALLY ANY ISSUE AND THERE WAS NOT A SINGLE VOTE

    PROPOSED BY MY COLLEAGUES HERE THAT SAID THAT WE CAN’T AGREE TO

    A LIFTING OF THE DEBT LIMIT. NOW, THE FLOOR WAS OPEN FOR THAT

    AMENDMENT. AND I DON’T KNOW WHY MY COLLEAGUES NOW VIEW THIS AS

    THE CRITERIA FOR US MOVING FORWARD ON THE BILL. SO I WISH THEM

    LUCK, AND I WILL NOT BE COMING TO THE FLOOR AGAIN TO OBJECT TO

    THEIR OBJECTION, AND WE’LL LET THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MAKE THE

    JUDGMENT. I YIELD THE FLOOR.

    THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE SENATOR FROM WASHINGTON.

    MRS. MURRAY: I WANT TO THANK THE SENATOR FROM ARIZONA FOR HIS

    VERY HEARTFELT REMARKS. HE AND I DON’T AGREE ON A LOT BUT WE

    AGREE WE WANT THIS COUNTRY TO WORK. BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE

    ISN’T GREAT. AND THE WAY FOR THIS COUNTRY TO WORK IS FOR FOR TO

    US COME TOGETHER WITH OUR DIFFERENCES OF OPINION AND MOVE

    FORWARD AND THAT’S WHAT THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE IS ALL ABOUT.

    SO, MADAM PRESIDENT, I ASK UNANIMOUS CONSENT THAT THE SENATE

    PROCEED TO THE CONSIDERATION OF CALENDAR NUMBER 33, H. CON.

    RES. 25, THE AMENDMENT WHICH IS AT THE DESK, THE TEXT OF S.

    CON. RES. 8, THE BUDGET RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE SENATE BE

    INSERTED IN LIEU THEREOF, THAT THE MOTION TO RECONSIDER BE LAID

    ON THE TABLE, THE SENATE INSIST ON ITS AMENDMENT, REQUEST A

    CONFERENCE WITH THE HOUSE ON THE DISAGREEING VOTES OF THE TWO

    HOUSES, AND THE CHAIR AUTHORIZED TO APPOINT CONFEREES ON THE

    PART OF THE SENATE, FOLLOWING THE AUTHORIZATION TWO MOTIONS TO

    INSTRUCT CONFERENCES BE IN ORDER FROM EACH SIDE. MOTION TO

    INSTRUCT RELATIVE TO THE DEBT LIMIT AND MOTION TO INSTRUCT

    RELATIVE TO TAXES AND REVENUE. THERE BE TWO HOURS OF DEBATE

    EQUALLY DIVIDED BETWEEN THE TWO LEADERS OR THEIR DESIGNEES

    PRIOR TO VOTES IN RELATIONS TO THE MOTIONS, FURTHER NO

    AMENDMENTS ANY OF THE AMENDMENTEDS PRIOR TO THE VOTE ALL OF THE

    ABOVE OCCURRING WITH NO INTERVENING ACTION OR DEBATE.

    THE PRESIDING OFFICER: IS THERE OBJECTIONAM ?

    THE SENATOR FROM FLORIDA.

    MR. RUBIO: RESERVING THE RIGHT TO OBJECT — FIRST I THANK THE

    SENATOR FROM ARIZONA FOR PROTECTING MY RIGHT TO OBJECT IN MY

    ABSENCE BEFORE I MADE IT TO

    FLOOR AND JUST TO SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT, I DON’T THINK THAT

    WE OBJECT TO MOVING THE BUDGET CONFERENCE. WE OBJECT TO MOVING

    THE BUDGET CONFERENCE AND HAVING THE DEBT LIMIT RAISED WITHIN

    THAT CONFERENCE. I WOULD ASK THE SENATOR IF SHE WOULD CONSIDER

    A UNANIMOUS CONSENT THAT SHE MODIFY HER REQUEST SO IT NOT BE IN

    ORDER FOR THE SENATE TO CONSIDER A CONFERENCE REPORT THAT

    INCLUDES RECONCILIATION INSTRUCTIONS TO RAISE THE DEBT LIMIT.

    MRS. MURRAY: MADAM PRESIDENT, IF THE SENATOR HEARD MY REQUEST,

    I SAID THAT WE WOULD CONSIDER A MOTION TO INSTRUCT RELATIVE TO

    THE DEBT LIMIT AS PART OF OUR AGREEMENT TO MOVE TO CONFERENCE.

    SO SO THE SENATOR WOULD BE ALLOWED TO MAKE HIS VOICE HEARD AT

    THAT TIME, AND I WOULD OBJECT TO MAKING A REQUIREMENT WITHOUT A

    VOTE OF THE SENATE THAT SAYS THE MAJORITY WOULD AGREE WITH

    THAT. SO I WOULD OBJECT TO HIS AMENDMENT AND AGAIN ASK FOR

    CONSENT ON THE AGREEMENT THAT I HAVE BEFORE ME.

    THE PRESIDING OFFICER: OBJECTION IS HEARD. IS THERE OBJECTION

    TO THE ORIGINAL REQUEST?

    MR. RUBIO: MADAM PRESIDENT?

    THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE SENATOR FROM FLORIDA.

    MR. RUBIO: I OBJECT.

    THE PRESIDING OFFICER: OBJECTION IS HEARD.

  • This afternoon, there were multiple requests for additional amendments to be called up to S.954, the Farm bill.  None of the amendments received the consent necessary.  The details of each request are below.Senator McCain asked unanimous consent to set aside the pending amendment so that his amendment #956 (catfish) could be made pending. Senator Landrieu objected to his request because she would like to call up her amendment #1113 (flood insurance) and is currently unable to receive unanimous consent.Senator Coburn asked unanimous consent to set aside the pending amendment and call up his amendments:-          Coburn #1003 (prohibit Federal farm subsidies to person having seriously delinquent tax debts),-          Coburn #1004 (conservation purposes to end subsidies to millionaires),

    –          Coburn #1005 (consolidate nutrition programs),

    –          Coburn #1006 (access and safety of specialty crops),

    –          Coburn #1007 (funding for market access program),

    –          Coburn #1008 (eliminate duplicative access to broadband telecommunications in rural areas),

    –          Coburn #1010 (prohibit replacement of ICD-9 with ICD-10 in implementing HIPAA standards),

    –          McCaskill #1076 (prohibition on performance awards in Senior Executive Service during sequestration),

    –          Coburn #1152 (allow demonstration projects to promote healthy eating among SNAP recipients).

    Senator Landrieu objected to the first 5 requests.  Senator Stabenow objected on Senator Landrieu’s behalf to the subsequent requests.

    Senator Landrieu asked unanimous consent to set aside the pending amendment and call up the following amendments:

    –          Landrieu #1113 (flood insurance)

    –          Johnson SD-Crapo #1117 (flood insurance)

    –          Cardin #1159 (side by side to Grassley #1097) and

    –          Grassley #1097 (protect information of livestock producers)

    that the time until 5:00pm be for debate on the amendments, that at 5:00pm, the Senate proceed to vote on the amendments and that all amendments be subject to a 60 affirmative vote threshold.

    Senator Toomey objected to Senator Landrieu’s request because he would like additional amendments to be permitted to be made pending and receive votes.

    Senator Coburn asked unanimous consent that every amendment filed to the Farm bill be considered read, debatable, and be available for a vote.  Senator Stabenow objected to the request.

  • During Tuesday’s session of the Senate, cloture was filed on the following items in the following order:
  • –          S.954, the Farm bill.-          Motion to proceed to S.1003, A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reset interest rates for new student loans (Coburn) and

    –          Motion to proceed to S.953, the Student Loan Affordability Act (Reed).

    The filing deadline for first degree amendments to S.954, the Farm bill is 1:00pm on Wednesday, June 5th. The filing deadline for second degree amendments is 9:45am on Thursday, June 6th.

    At 10:00am on Thursday, there will be 3 roll call votes in relation to the following in the following order:

    –          Motion to invoke cloture on S.954, the Farm bill,

    –          Motion to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to S.1003, A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reset interest rates for new student loans (Coburn) and

    –          Motion to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to S.953, the Student Loan Affordability Act (Reed).

    Details of the agreement are below.

    If cloture is invoked on S.954, the Farm bill, the Senate will proceed vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to Calendar #76, S.1003 [Republican bill]. Upon conclusion of the vote, notwithstanding cloture having been invoked on S.1003, if it is invoked on S.1003, the Senate will proceed to vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to Calendar #74, S.953 [Democratic bill].

    Upon conclusion of the cloture vote on the motion to proceed to S.953 [Democratic bill], and notwithstanding cloture having been invoked, if it is invoked on S.953, the Senate will resume consideration of S.954, the Farm bill, post-cloture, if cloture was invoked on S.954.

    Upon disposition of S.954, the Farm bill, if cloture was invoked on either of the motions to proceed to S.953 or S.1003, the Senate then will resume the motion to proceed on which cloture was invoked, post-cloture.

    Further, if cloture was invoked on both motions to proceed, the Senate will consider the motions, post-cloture, in the order in which cloture was invoked. Finally, if the motion to proceed to S.1003 [Republican bill] is agreed to, and notwithstanding cloture having been invoked on the motion to proceed to S.953 [Democratic bill], the Senate will resume the motion to proceed to S.953 [Democratic bill], post-cloture, upon disposition of S.1003 [Republican bill].

  • WRAP UP
  • No ROLL CALL VOTESLEGISLATIVE ITEMS

    Adopted S.Con.Res.18, a concurrent resolution providing for the use of the catafalque situated in Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to be conducted in the United States Senate Chamber for the Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg, a late Senator from the State of New Jersey.

    Adopted S.Res.160, a resolution relative to the memorial observances of the Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg, a late Senator from the State of New Jersey.

    Adopted S.Res.161, relative to the death of the Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg, Senator from the State of New Jersey.

    Adopted S.Res.162, Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to childhood stroke and recognizing May 2013 as “National Pediatric Stroke Awareness Month”.

    No EXECUTIVE ITEMS

———————————————————————————————————————————————-

June 2013
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30

———————————————————————————————————————————————-

Watch Most Recent House Floor Activity

Last Floor Action:
8:36:25 P.M. – The House adjourned pursuant to H. Res. 242, as a further mark of respect to the memory of the late Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg.

The next meeting in the House is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on June 4, 2013.

——————————————————————————————————————————————–

Top 3: Facebook’s Policy On Pro-Rape Content


FACEBOOK WON’T FILTER MESSAGES LIKE THESE. HERE’S WHAT WOMEN ARE DOING ABOUT IT.

MEET THE EXTREMIST WHO COULD BE VIRGINIA’S NEXT LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

CONGRESSMAN TELLS WOMAN THAT SHE SHOULD HAVE GIVEN BIRTH TO HER BRAIN-DEAD FETUS

the Senate debates/votes S.954 Nominees S.Res65 :::::: CONGRES :::::: the House debates


capitolphonelines

The Senate stands in adjournment until 9:30am on Wednesday, May 22, 2013.

  • Following any Leader remarks, the Senate will be in morning business for one hour with the Republicans controlling the first half and the Majority controlling the final half.
  • Following morning business, the Senate will resume consideration of S.954, the Farm bill. We will continue to work through amendments to the Farm bill during Wednesday’s session of the Senate.
  • At 4:00pm, the Senate will proceed to the consideration of Calendar #43, S.Res.65, resolution strongly supporting the full implementation of United States and international sanctions on Iran and urging the President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation.
    • There will be 60 minutes for debate equally divided and controlled in the usual form.
    • Upon the use or yielding back of time (at approximately 5:00pm), there will be a roll call vote in relation to the resolution. If the resolution is agreed to, the preamble will be agreed to.
  • During Tuesday’s session of the Senate, cloture was filed on Executive Calendar #95, the nomination of Srikanth Srinivasan, Virginia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia Circuit.  Unless an agreement is reached, Senators should expect that cloture vote on Thursday morning.
  • This morning Senator McConnell asked unanimous consent that the Senate vote on Tuesday, June 4, at a time to be determined by the Majority Leader, following consultation with the Republican Leader, on confirmation of Executive Calendar #95, the nomination of Srikanth Srinivasan, of Virginia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia Circuit. Senator Reid objected and explained some of his frustrations over continued Republican delay on nominations. As a reminder, Senator Reid filed cloture on the Srinivasan nomination last night and the cloture vote will occur tomorrow.Senator McConnell noted that there is another circuit judge on the calendar that was reported prior to the Srinivasan nomination that the Wyoming senators would like to confirm. Senator Reid then suggested we confirm that nomination today and again asked consent to vote today on the Srinivasan today.
  • Senator McConnell objected and said he would continue working on nominations off the floor.
  • The Senate is in a period of morning business for 1 hour, with senators permitted to speak therein for up to 10 minutes each. Following morning business (approx 11:35am), the Senate will resume consideration of S.954, the Farm bill. Today we will continue to process amendments to the bill. Currently the Leahy amendment #998 (rural broadband) is pending.As a reminder, at 5pm today, the Senate will vote on adoption of S.Res.65, a resolution strongly supporting the full implementation of United States and international sanctions on Iran and urging the President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation.
  • For the information of senators, there is a chance that when we resume consideration of the Farm bill Senator Inhofe will offer amendment #960 (repeal nutrition entitlements programs and establish nutrition assistance block grants) and we vote in relation to the amendment as early as 12:00 noon.
  • At 12:00 noon the Senate began a 15 minute roll call vote on Inhofe amendment #960 (nutrition block grants);Not Agreed To: 36-60
  • The following amendments to S.954, the Farm bill, were agreed to by unanimous consent:-       Franken #992 (access to grocery delivery for homebound seniors and persons with disabilities); and-       Vitter #1056 (end food stamp eligibility for convicted violent rapists, pedophiles, and murders)
  • Senator Kaine asked unanimous consent to go to conference on the Budget resolution and that 2 motions to instruct conferees relative to the debt limit and taxes/revenue be in order. Senator Rubio asked that the request be modified to prohibit consideration of any conference report that includes reconciliation instructions regarding the debt limit. Senator Kaine objected to modify his request. Senator Rubio objected to the original request. Senator McCain then argued that we go through regular order and go to conference on the budget resolution, with motions to instruct conferees in order, and a debate ensued.

Senator Stabenow has called up Shaheen amendment #925 (Sugar programs ). We are working towards an agreement to vote in relation to the amendment this afternoon, perhaps around the vote on the Iran Sanctions resolution.

At 3:45pm the Senate will begin consideration of S.Res.65, Iran Sanctions. There will be up to 50 minutes for debate, with the Majority controlling 20 minutes and the Republicans controlling 30 minutes. At approximately 4:35pm, the Senate will proceed to vote on adoption of the resolution. There will then be 2 minutes for debate equally divided prior to a vote in relation to the Shaheen amendment #925 (sugar programs). No second degree amendments are in order to the Shaheen amendment prior to the vote.

4:35pm votes

–       Adoption of S.Res.65, Iran Sanctions

–       Shaheen amendment #925 (sugar programs)

The Senate has reached an agreement that tomorrow, following the cloture vote on the Srinivasan nomination and notwithstanding cloture having been invoked, if invoked, the Senate resume legislative session and consideration of S.954, the Farm bill, and the Senate then proceed to vote in relation to the pending Sanders amendment #965 (GMO food labels). No second degree amendments are in order prior to the vote. the amendment is subject to a 60 affirmative vote threshold. The time consumed during consideration of the Farm bill will count post-cloture.

There will be 2 roll call votes at 10:30am:

–          motion to invoke cloture on Executive Calendar #95, the nomination of Srikanth Srinivasan, Virginia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia; and

–          Sanders amendment #965 (GMO foods)(60 affirmative-vote threshold).

4:36pm The Senate began a roll call vote on adoption of S.Res.65, Iran Sanctions.

Adopted: 99-0

:04pm The Senate began a 15 minute roll call vote on Shaheen amendment #925 (sugar programs);

Not Agreed To: 44-54

The managers of the bill will continue to work on amendments,  however, there will be no further roll call votes today.

There will be no further roll call votes during today’s session.

The following amendments are pending to S.954, the Farm bill:

The following amendments have been considered to S.954, the Farm bill:

  • Cantwell amendment #919 (Indian tribes – land and soil conservation programs) Agreed to: 87-8
  • Sessions amendment #945, as modified (eligibility criteria for agriculture irrigation assistance) Agreed to by unanimous consent
  • Roberts amendment #948 (SNAP) Not Agreed to: 40-58
  • Gillibrand amendment #931 (SNAP funding) Not Agreed to: 26-70
  • Inhofe amendment #960 (repeal SNAP and establish nutrition assistance block program) Not Agreed to: 36-60
  • Franken amendment #992 (access to grocery delivery for homebound seniors and persons with disabilities) Agreed to by unanimous consent
  • Vitter amendment #1056 (end food stamp eligibility for convicted violent rapists, pedophiles, and murderers) Agreed to by unanimous consent
  • Shaheen amendment #925 (Federal sugar program) Not Agreed to: 45-54

Senator Sanders called up amendment #965 (GMO food labels). We are working on an agreement to vote in relation to the his amendment tomorrow. As a reminder, the cloture vote on the Srinavasan will occur tomorrow, potentially in the 10:30am range. Stay tuned for a final decision on the vote time.

The Senate is in a period of morning business with senators permitted to speak therein for up to 10 minutes each.

WRAP UP

ROLL CALL VOTES

1)      Inhofe amendment #960 (nutrition assistance block grants) to S.954, the Farm bill; Not Agreed to: 36-60

2)      Adoption of S.Res.65, Iran Sanctions; Adopted: 99-0

3)      Shaheen amendment #965 (federal sugar program reform) to S.954; Not Agreed to: 45-54

LEGISLATIVE ITEMS

Passed H.R.258, the Stolen Valor Act of 2013.

Completed the Rule 14 process of H.R.45, the Repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

Completed the Rule 14 process of S.1003, the Comprehensive Student Loan Protection Act. (Coburn)

Completed the Rule 14 process of S.1004, the Anti-Trust Freedom Act. (Paul)

No EXECUTIVE ITEMS

 ************************************************************************************

May 2013
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

*************************************************************************************************

Last Floor Action:
5:05:58 P.M. – The House adjourned.

The next meeting in the House is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on May 22, 2013.

***********************************************************************************************************