Advocates ~ The DOJ Still Uses the VRA and What Advocates Can Leverage


Even after Shelby County v. Holder (2013) dismantled Section 5 preclearance, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) remains a powerful federal tool for challenging discriminatory voting practices — and the DOJ still uses it, though its reach is narrower.

Why the DOJ Can Still Use the VRA

  • Section 2 remains in force: Section 2 prohibits voting practices or procedures (including redistricting plans and voter registration systems) that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or language minority status, whether intentionally or as a result of discriminatory effect 
  • Nationwide application: Unlike Section 5, Section 2 applies everywhere, so the DOJ can litigate in any state or territory 
  • Enforcement tools: The DOJ can bring federal lawsuits, seek injunctions, and work with federal courts to block or alter laws that dilute minority voting power 
  • Recent DOJ actions: The DOJ has won cases like United States v. State of Alabama, where a preliminary injunction halted a voter removal program after a Section 2 challenge 

What Part of the Weakened VRA Still Allows Federal Intervention

  • Section 2 litigation: This is the core remaining federal enforcement mechanism. It can be used to block laws or maps that show racial vote dilution or discriminatory intent 
  • Federal court injunctions: Courts can issue temporary or permanent injunctions under Section 2, stopping harmful laws from taking effect while litigation proceeds 
  • DOJ as lead plaintiff: In some cases, the DOJ is the only entity allowed to sue under Section 2, giving it significant leverage 

How Advocates and Lawyers Can Use These Tools

  1. File Section 2 lawsuits: Even without preclearance, plaintiffs can challenge laws or maps that have a discriminatory effect or intent. This is the most direct way to block restrictive measures.
  2. Seek injunctions: Use federal courts to get immediate relief before elections or before laws take effect.
  3. Target high-impact jurisdictions: Focus on states or counties with histories of discrimination, where Section 2 claims are more likely to succeed.
  4. Coalition litigation: Partner with civil rights groups to pool resources and expertise.
  5. Monitor DOJ enforcement: Track DOJ actions to identify patterns and opportunities for coordinated legal challenges.
  6. Leverage recent DOJ wins: Use cases like Alabama to build legal arguments and public support.

Bottom line: The DOJ can still use the VRA because Section 2 remains a live, nationwide prohibition on discriminatory voting practices. Advocates can use this by litigating under Section 2, seeking injunctions, and focusing on jurisdictions where the law’s reach is strongest — even if the Act’s preventive preclearance power is gone.

 U.S. Department of Justice

Source: govfacts.org, peopleslawreview.com, factually.co ,

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.