Keep the water on in Brightmoor ~ Roslyn Bouier via OrganizeFor

People have a right to water!

Dear Friends

I just started a petition titled “Keep the water on in Brightmoor

Black people in Brightmoor are suffering as a result of the city’s decision to deny them water. Brightmoor is a Black community here in Detroit that has seen the pressure of gentrification and lack of economic support lead to longtime Black residents without secure housing. Residents in Brightmoor without secure housing prospects are only further punished when the city takes their water away. While the people of the community are forced to pay ever-rising rents, they are also being pushed out by the city who is denying them utilities they need to live.1 With thousands of residents across Detroit being denied water, we know Black communities like Brightmoor will be hit the hardest. Without water Black people in Brightmoor find themselves falling further behind the eightball as they search for jobs that can allow them to afford to live in the community they’ve known their entire lives. Water and Sewerage Director Gary Brown and Mayor Mike Duggan have the power to stop the shutoffs now.

Tell the city to stop taking away water from the people of Brightmoor.

This is not the first time Detroit has caused thousands of Black people to suffer without water. Despite being told that water cutoffs are a public health risk Mayor Mike Duggan and Water and Sewage Director Gary Brown directed the city water department to shut off water for more than 76,000 people in Detroit between 2014 and 2016.2 Director Brown has gone on record as saying that no one should have their water cut off in Detroit, now Black people in Brightmoor and throughout Detroit are being threatened with just that. 

The city of Detroit’s water cutoff policy leaves the people of Brightmoor with few options when searching for fresh water to drink, bathe and cook. Students in households who had their water cutoff had to find a way to learn while also worrying about staying clean and avoiding the attention of their peers. People working or searching had to find a way to keep their clothes clean or risk their only option to get current on their bills and restore their water. Without access to clean and safe water, people are exposed to a greater risk of contracting Hepatitis A. Residents throughout the community rely on water from community partners, We The People and the Brightmoor Connection food pantry, putting an incredible strain on the resources needed to address other areas in dire need of help. Changing the water policy to end cutoffs would allow Black people who make-up Brightmoor and Detroit as a whole better cope with rising rent pushing people out of the only community they’ve known.

Will you sign the petition and forward this email to make sure your voice is heard? Add your name here.

Director Gary Brown and Mayor Mike Duggan can help Black people in Brightmoor and Detroit by ending the policy to deny people water service. It is the only equitable option for a city that is interested in assisting residents who have been the backbone of the city as they face growing financial pressure from gentrification. Join us in demanding that he keeps the water on in Brightmoor.

Tell the city’s leadership it needs to act now.

Thank you,

Roslyn Bouier



  1. “Controversial water shutoffs could hit 17,461 Detroit households.” Detroit Free Press. March 26, 2018.
  2. “Gov hopeful pledges moratorium on water shutoffs.” The Detroit News. November 2, 2017.

Voting Rights Roundup: Blame Andrew Cuomo and the IDC for New York’s failure to expand voting rights

The Daily Kos Elections Voting Rights Roundup is written by Stephen Wolf and edited by David Nir.

New York: New York’s Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and a group of eight renegade Democratic state senators who make up the so-called “Independent Democratic Conference” recently announced a deal that calls for the IDC to abandon its alliance with Republicans and reunite with mainstream Democrats. Such an agreement would, depending on other factors, theoretically bring an end to GOP control of the Senate, which has only remained possible over the last several years thanks to the IDC.

But no issue makes it plainer how tissue-thin this supposed deal is than the Senate’s repeated failure to pass measures to expand voting rights, and this new arrangement could very easily dissipate after this year’s primaries.

For his entire seven years as governor, Cuomo has enabled Republican control over the state Senate in this dark-blue state by signing one of the most extreme GOP gerrymanders in the country and tacitly supporting the IDC. In turn, Republicans have repeatedly blocked proposals to allow early voting, no-excuse absentee voting, automatic voter registration, same-day voter registration, and online registration—just about every imaginable expansion of voting rights, the GOP has opposed. Indeed, the Senate Republicans predictably dropped a measure from the recently agreed-upon state budget that would have finally brought early voting to New York

Senate Democrats were entirely shut out of these budget negotiations—as they have been for many years now—which was only possible thanks to Cuomo and the IDC. Democrats would, in fact, have held a nominal one-seat majority during this year’s budget negotiations if Cuomo hadn’t waited to schedule two special elections Democrats are favored to win until afterthe budget was passed. This undemocratic ploy deprived Democrats of a shot at the majority, letting those those eight IDC members (and one additional Democrat who outright caucuses with the GOP) try to shift blame to Republicans for the failure to pass policies like early voting.

Not only is this deal itself suspect, the IDC’s motives for finally making it are, too. Most of the faction’s members face serious primary challenges this September, as does Cuomo himself, so any moves toward unification are assuredly aimed at undermining the burgeoning enthusiasm for all of their opponents. And there would be nothing stopping the IDC from once again defecting to the GOP after this year’s elections, since Cuomo made similar promises in 2014 only to act as though he’d never made them after he and his allies won their primaries.

Cuomo and the IDC have been extremely cynical in pretending to lead the charge for voting rights while doing nothing to oust the Republicans who oppose these reforms from their position of power. Their latest charade demonstrates why voting rights advocates need mainstream Democrats to win back a majority in the state Senate without relying on any IDC members who could defect to once again prop up Republican control of the Senate in this heavily Democratic state.


• West Virginia: In late March, Republican Gov. Jim Justice signed a lawpassed by the GOP-run legislature that will end the use of multi-member districts in the state House, which are currently used to elect 53 of the chamber’s 100 members. This law won’t take effect until after the next round of redistricting following the 2020 census, but it will bring West Virginia into line with the vast majority of states that rely solely on single-member districts. (West Virginia’s state Senate districts each have two members who serve staggered four-year terms.)

So why the change? Republicans may believe it will give them an even greater electoral advantage after 2020, when they will likely control redistricting for the first time in a century, though whether single- or multi-member districts favor one party or the other is unclear. The shift could also lead to less voter confusion.

But whatever the political effects of this move may be, it’s a good bet Republicans aren’t motivated chiefly by the pursuit of good governance, since they simultaneously blocked a separate measure that would have prohibited partisan gerrymandering during the redistricting process.

• WisconsinOn Tuesday, Wisconsin progressives scored a dramatic victory when Judge Rebecca Dallet beat conservative Judge Michael Screnock by a resounding 56-44 margin to win a 10-year term on the state Supreme Court. Dallet’s election means the conservative majority will shrink to just one seat on the seven-member high court, putting progressives in a position to take the majority for themselves some time over the next few years. Consequently, this race could have lasting implications for the fight against future Republican gerrymandering and voter suppression efforts.

Starting in 2011, Republicans under Gov. Scott Walker passed extreme congressional and legislative gerrymanders that have allowed them to easily maintain their majorities—even in election years like 2012, when Democratic candidates have won more votes. Republicans have also implemented a new voter ID law, cut early voting, and made it harder to register to vote. But instead of providing voting rights supporters with a venue to try to fight these measures, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority shut down an investigation into political corruption in Walker’s administration and has even let judges preside over cases that involve their own campaign donors.

Knowing the high court wouldn’t stop him, Walker has run roughshod over voting rights, but Dallet’s victory puts progressives one step closer to being able to block these GOP power grabs, with gerrymandering at the top of the list. If Republicans are still in charge of state government following the 2020 census, they will almost certainly try to warp election districts to death in order to preserve their majorities. But if progressives have managed to win a majority on the high court by then, the justices might follow the lead of their peers in Pennsylvania and conclude that the state constitution prohibits partisan gerrymandering altogether.

Voter Registration

• Maryland: Maryland became the latest state to enact automatic voter registration when Republican Gov. Larry Hogan let the bill become law without his signature after it was passed by the heavily Democratic legislature with veto-proof majorities. Notably, this law extends the new registration system beyond the state’s motor vehicles department to include other state agencies, like Maryland’s Obamacare exchange. That broader scope is important for reaching eligible voters who don’t drive, such as people with disabilities or those who rely on public transportation.

• New Jersey: New Jersey Democrats have now advanced a proposal to implement automatic voter registration out of committee in both the state Senate and state Assembly. Encouragingly, they amended the measure to give several other state agencies the option to implement automatic registration instead of limiting the bill’s coverage to those who obtain or renew a driver’s license or state ID card. However, only the Motor Vehicle Commission would actually be required to proceed with instituting automatic registration.

Democrats also passed a bill in a state Assembly committee that would expand the right to vote in primaries to 17-year-olds who will turn 18 by the time of the general election. More than a dozen states and Washington, D.C. have similar laws in effect, and broadening the franchise in this manner could make young voters more likely to cast a ballot to begin with.

• Texas: A federal judge ruled that Texas’s GOP-run state government violated the National Voter Registration Act by failing to let voters register when they updated their driver’s license info online. The NVRA, commonly called the Motor Voter Law, requires states under its jurisdiction to give citizens a chance to register when they apply for or renew their driver’s license, but Texas only did so for those applying in person. Instead, online applicants were sent through a misleading process that may have caused thousands to think they were registered only to find out on Election Day that they were not.

The plaintiffs have asked the court to impose a a 90-day timeline for Republican lawmakers to remedy the situation, which would allow a revamped system to come online before the November general election if the court agrees. However, Republicans have promised to appeal to the conservative-leaning Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has often rejected complaints from those suing Texas Republicans over their voting restrictions.

Voter Suppression

• Nebraska: For the eighth year in a row, the Democratic minority in Nebraska’s unicameral legislature has defeated a Republican-backed bill to place a constitutional amendment that would implement voter ID on the ballot. While Nebraska’s state Senate is formally nonpartisan, Republicans have dominated the body for many years. However, the Democrats’ 17 seats in the 49-member chamber gives them the bare minimum needed to sustain a filibuster without any Republican votes.

• North Dakota: In a new ruling issued Wednesday, a federal district court has curtailed North Dakota’s Republican-backed voter ID law for infringing on Native American voting rights. The judge’s order both blocks the state from requiring IDs that include a current residential street address and also allows certain tribal documents to serve as a valid ID. The address requirement could have disenfranchised thousands of Native American voters who live on reservations, where they often lack a street address and instead receive mail at a post office box.

This ruling is the second time this same judge, Daniel Hovland, has blocked part of this voter ID law, since he previously ruled against it in 2016. That prompted the GOP to pass a revised version in 2017, which is the subject of this current dispute. While an appeal is possible, one part of the decision did please the GOP and might dissuade Republicans from pursuing the case further. Hovland ruled that the state is no longer obligated to allow provisional voting (which five percent of voters used in 2016), which Republican Secretary of State Al Jaegar called a “significant step toward maintaining the integrity of the election process.

North Dakota is the only state in the country that doesn’t have voter registration at all— eligible voters simply need to provide proof of residency. Consequently, documentation of some sort is necessary here, but that does not excuse Republican efforts to disenfranchise eligible voters given that impersonation fraud is practically nonexistent.

Ballot Measures

• MaineOn Wednesday, a state court judge delivered a victory for election reformers when she ordered Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap to continue proceeding to implement instant-runoff voting (IRV) for this June’s primary elections. IRV backers had sought this order after lawyers in the attorney general’s expressed their opinion last week that IRV couldn’t be used in June due to a drafting error in the text of a referendum to block the legislature’s repeal of IRV, a convoluted story that we have previously delved into.

While this outcome is encouraging for IRV backers, it’s unlikely to bring a final resolution to the question of whether Maine will in fact use IRV this year. The Republican majority in the state Senate and a few Democratic defectors recently authorized GOP state Senate President Mike Thibodeau to petition the court to intervene on behalf of those opposing IRV, so appeals may be forthcoming. Consequently, it may take a ruling by the state Supreme Court to clarify once and for all whether IRV can be used in June.

Felony Disenfranchisement

• Florida: Republican Gov. Rick Scott’s administration will appeal a federal district court ruling from last month that struck down Florida’s arbitrary and onerous system for restoring voting rights to those who have completed their sentences for felony convictions. The district court also denied Scott’s request to stay its order to institute a new rights restoration process by April 26 while he appeals, with the judge excoriating Scott’s attorneys for trying “to run out the clock” by making “astounding arguments” that are “rooted in neither common sense nor reality.”

2020 Census

• Census: As expected, 17 Democratic state attorneys general and several major cities filed a lawsuit on Tuesday over the Trump administration’s recent decision add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census. The lawsuit argues that asking about citizenship would undermine the requirement found in the Constitution that the federal government count every resident of the United States by depressing participation among noncitizens and their families. The suit also alleges that the rushed inclusion of this question, which skipped the standard testing associated with any important changes to the census questionnaire, also violates other federal laws.

It’s difficult to say what the chances of success are for litigation against Trump’s attempt to weaponize the census for partisan gain. But Republicans would be very unlikely to support any legislative effort to reverse this move, and even if Democrats can retake Congress this fall, they’d need GOP support to override a presidential veto. Consequently, lawsuits like this one may be the best chance civil rights advocates have to ensure that the census accurately measures the American population.

To advertise in the Voting Rights Roundup, please contact

Titanic 4/10/1912

Rare Titanic Photo Depicts Final Days

Titanic’s departure from Southampton on April 10 was not without some oddities. A small coal fire was discovered in one of her bunkers–an alarming but not uncommon occurrence on steamships of the day. Stokers hosed down the smoldering coal and shoveled it aside to reach the base of the blaze. After assessing the situation, the captain and chief engineer concluded that it was unlikely it had caused any damage that could affect the hull structure, and the stokers were ordered to continue controlling the fire at sea.

According to a theory put forth by a small number of Titanic experts, the fire became uncontrollable after the ship left Southampton, forcing the crew to attempt a full-speed crossing; moving at such a fast pace, they were unable to avoid the fatal collision with the iceberg.

Another unsettling event took place when Titanic left the Southampton dock. As she got underway, she narrowly escaped a collision with the America Line’s S.S. New York. Superstitious Titanic buffs sometimes point to this as the worst kind of omen for a ship departing on her maiden voyage.

On April 14, after four days of uneventful sailing, Titanic received sporadic reports of ice from other ships, but she was sailing on calm seas under a moonless, clear sky.

At about 11:30 p.m., a lookout saw an iceberg coming out of a slight haze dead ahead, then rang the warning bell and telephoned the bridge. The engines were quickly reversed and the ship was turned sharply—instead of making direct impact, Titanic seemed to graze along the side of the berg, sprinkling ice fragments on the forward deck.

Sensing no collision, the lookouts were relieved. They had no idea that the iceberg had a jagged underwater spur, which slashed a 300-foot gash in the hull below the ship’s waterline.

By the time the captain toured the damaged area with Harland and Wolff’s Thomas Andrews, five compartments were already filling with seawater, and the bow of the doomed ship was alarmingly pitched downward, allowing seawater to pour from one bulkhead into the neighboring compartment.

Andrews did a quick calculation and estimated that Titanic might remain afloat for an hour and a half, perhaps slightly more. At that point the captain, who had already instructed his wireless operator to call for help, ordered the lifeboats to be loaded.

A little more than an hour after contact with the iceberg, a largely disorganized and haphazard evacuation began with the lowering of the first lifeboat. The craft was designed to hold 65 people; it left with only 28 aboard.

Tragically, this was to be the norm: During the confusion and chaos during the precious hours before Titanic plunged into the sea, nearly every lifeboat would be launched woefully under-filled, some with only a handful of passengers.

In compliance with the law of the sea, women and children boarded the boats first; only when there were no women or children nearby were men permitted to board. Yet many of the victims were in fact women and children, the result of disorderly procedures that failed to get them to the boats in the first place.

Exceeding Andrews’ prediction, Titanic stubbornly stayed afloat for close to three hours. Those hours witnessed acts of craven cowardice and extraordinary bravery. Hundreds of human dramas unfolded between the order to load the lifeboats and the ship’s final plunge: Men saw off wives and children, families were separated in the confusion and selfless individuals gave up their spots to remain with loved ones or allow a more vulnerable passenger to escape.

The ship’s most illustrious passengers each responded to the circumstances with conduct that has become an integral part of the Titanic legend. Ismay, the White Star managing director, helped load some of the boats and later stepped onto a collapsible as it was being lowered. Although no women or children were in the vicinity when he abandoned ship, he would never live down the ignominy of surviving the disaster while so many others perished.

Thomas Andrews, Titanic’s chief designer, was last seen in the First Class smoking room, staring blankly at a painting of a ship on the wall. Astor deposited his wife Madeleine into a lifeboat and, remarking that she was pregnant, asked if he could accompany her; refused entry, he managed to kiss her goodbye just before the boat was lowered away. Although offered a seat on account of his age, Isidor Straus refused any special consideration, and his wife Ida would not leave her husband behind. The couple retired to their cabin and perished together.

Benjamin Guggenheim and his valet returned to their rooms and changed into formal evening dress; emerging onto the deck, he famously declared, “We are dressed in our best and are prepared to go down like gentlemen.”

Molly Brown helped load the boats and finally was forced into one of the last to leave. She implored its crewmen to turn back for survivors, but they refused, fearing they would be swamped by desperate people trying to escape the icy seas.

Titanic, nearly perpendicular and with many of her lights still aglow, finally dove beneath the ocean’s surface at about 2:20 a.m. on April 15. Throughout the morning, Cunard’s Carpathia, after receiving Titanic’s distress call at midnight and steaming at full speed while dodging ice floes all night, rounded up all of the lifeboats. They contained only 705 survivors.

At least five separate boards of inquiry on both sides of the Atlantic conducted comprehensive hearings on Titanic’s sinking, interviewing dozens of witnesses and consulting with many maritime experts. Every conceivable subject was investigated, from the conduct of the officers and crew to the construction of the ship.

While it has always been assumed that the ship sank as a result of the gash that caused the bulkhead compartments to flood, various other theories have emerged over the decades, including that the ship’s steel plates were too brittle for the near-freezing Atlantic waters, that the impact caused rivets to pop and that the expansion joints failed, among others.

Technological aspects of the catastrophe aside, Titanic’s demise has taken on a deeper, almost mythic, meaning in popular culture. Many view the tragedy as a morality play about the dangers of human hubris: Titanic’s creators believed they had built an unsinkable ship that could not be defeated by the laws of nature.

This same overconfidence explains the electrifying impact Titanic’s sinking had on the public when she was lost. There was widespread disbelief that the ship could possibly have sunk, and, due to the era’s slow and unreliable means of communication, misinformation abounded. Newspapers initially reported that the ship had collided with an iceberg but remained afloat and was being towed to port with everyone on board.

It took many hours for accurate accounts to become widely available, and even then people had trouble accepting that this paragon of modern technology could sink on her maiden voyage, taking more than 1,500 souls with her.

The ship historian John Maxtone-Graham has compared Titanic’s story to the Challenger space shuttle disaster of 1986. In that case, the world reeled at the notion that one of the most sophisticated inventions ever created could explode into oblivion along with its crew. Both tragedies triggered a sudden collapse in confidence, revealing that we remain subject to human frailties and error, despite our presumptions of technological infallibility.

Access hundreds of hours of historical video, commercial free, with HISTORY Vault. Start your free trial today.